Gibbs Energy Change
Two competing tendencies drive every chemical and physical change: systems try to shed energy (favouring low ) and try to spread energy and matter into more ways of arranging themselves (favouring high ). Tracking spontaneity through the second law alone means computing the entropy change of the surroundings every single time — inconvenient, since most problems only hand you data about the system. J. Willard Gibbs solved this by folding enthalpy and entropy into one new state function, Gibbs energy , whose sign at constant temperature and pressure tells you directly whether a process will happen on its own. This article builds from the second law, turns it into the working formula , reads off the spontaneity rules, and links to the equilibrium constant .
Gibbs energy combines a system's enthalpy and entropy into one state function, so that alone — no data about the surroundings needed — decides spontaneity at constant temperature and pressure.
The core idea
Why a new function is needed. The second law says a process is spontaneous only if . That is exact, but is awkward to measure directly for a chemical system. Gibbs energy repackages the same physics using only system properties.
The definition. For any system at constant :
where: is Gibbs (free) energy, is enthalpy, is absolute temperature (kelvin), and is entropy — all properties of the system alone.
The working equation. At constant temperature and pressure, the change in between two states is:
where: is the enthalpy change (kJ mol⁻¹), is the entropy change (usually given in J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, so it must be converted to kJ before use), and is the constant absolute temperature at which the process occurs.
The spontaneity criterion. This single quantity replaces the need to track the surroundings:
- : the process is spontaneous (exergonic).
- : the process is non-spontaneous in the forward direction — the reverse process is spontaneous instead (endergonic).
- : the system is at equilibrium; forward and reverse rates balance and there is no net driving force either way.
How and interact. Because is a sum of one term independent of and one term proportional to , the four sign combinations behave very differently:
| Spontaneity | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| always negative | spontaneous at all | ||
| always positive | non-spontaneous at all | ||
| depends on | spontaneous at low only | ||
| depends on | spontaneous at high only |
For the two temperature-dependent rows, there is a crossover temperature where the reaction switches character. Setting gives , so:
Gibbs energy and the equilibrium constant. At standard conditions, links directly to the equilibrium constant :
where: is the gas constant, is absolute temperature, and is the equilibrium constant. A large negative gives a large (products favoured at equilibrium); a large positive gives a small (reactants favoured). This is only an introductory, qualitative-to-basic-quantitative link — full treatment of and the reaction quotient belongs to the Equilibrium chapter.
The goal is to show, starting only from the second law of thermodynamics stated for total entropy and the definitions of enthalpy and Gibbs energy already known from this unit, that a single system-only quantity can replace as the test for spontaneity at constant temperature and pressure, and that its sign gives exactly the spontaneous, non-spontaneous and equilibrium categories used throughout this topic.
Step 1. Start from the second law: a process is spontaneous if and only if . At constant pressure, the heat released by the system to the surroundings is , and if the surroundings are large enough to stay at constant temperature , they absorb this heat reversibly, so .
Step 2. Substitute this into the second law: . Multiply through by (a positive quantity, so the inequality flips): .
Step 3. Define (dropping the "system" subscript, since only system quantities remain). From Step 2, . Since is always positive, the sign of is exactly opposite to the sign of .
Step 4. Read off the criterion. Spontaneous processes need , which by Step 3 means . Non-spontaneous (forward) processes have , meaning . Equilibrium, where there is no net driving force in either direction, has , meaning . This recovers exactly the three-way rule stated above, built entirely from the second law and constant-pressure heat exchange — no new physics was assumed, only a repackaging into a system-only quantity.
Worked example
Problem: For a reaction at 298 K, and . Calculate at 298 K, comment on spontaneity, and find the temperature at which the reaction switches from spontaneous to non-spontaneous.
Step 1. Match units before combining. is in kJ mol⁻¹ but is in J K⁻¹mol⁻¹, so convert: .
Step 2. Apply at :
Since , the reaction is spontaneous at 298 K.
Step 3. Check whether spontaneity depends on . Both and are negative here, so from the sign table this reaction is spontaneous only at sufficiently low temperature. Find the crossover temperature by setting , i.e., :
The reaction stays spontaneous for and becomes non-spontaneous above it — consistent with 298 K (well below 424.6 K) giving a negative .
Competitive stretch
Problem: A reaction has equilibrium constant at 298 K. Find and state whether the reaction favours reactants or products at equilibrium.
Step 1. Compute : since , .
Step 2. Apply with , :
Since is positive and , the reaction strongly favours reactants at equilibrium — the forward reaction is non-spontaneous under standard conditions, exactly as the small suggests.
Common traps
- Unit mismatch: is usually in kJ mol⁻¹ while is in J K⁻¹mol⁻¹ — forgetting to convert before combining them in is the single most common numerical error.
- Reading as "the reaction will happen fast." Gibbs energy tests thermodynamic feasibility only — reaction rate is a separate (kinetics) question.
- Applying the sign table by checking only one of or — both signs are needed to know whether spontaneity is universal, never, or temperature-dependent.
- Treating as the full equilibrium story at this level — here it is only an introductory link; and reaction quotient are developed properly in the Equilibrium chapter.
Ask the tutor: want to work through more -versus-temperature problems or see how connects to the equilibrium constant in more detail?
Why do we need Gibbs energy at all when the second law already tells us spontaneity via total entropy?
The second law is correct but inconvenient: needs the entropy change of the surroundings, which usually is not given directly. Gibbs energy repackages that same second-law inequality (as shown in the derivation above) into , a quantity built purely from system properties — , , and — all of which are typically supplied in a problem. It gives the identical spontaneity verdict with far less bookkeeping.
If ΔG is negative, does that mean the reaction happens instantly?
No. only says a reaction is thermodynamically favourable — it will proceed spontaneously given enough time, releasing usable energy as it does. It says nothing about how fast that happens. A reaction can have a strongly negative and still be immeasurably slow at room temperature because of a large activation energy barrier — rate is governed by kinetics, a separate topic from thermodynamics.
How is the crossover temperature T equals ΔH over ΔS actually used in practice?
It marks the single temperature at which switches sign, found by setting in . It is only meaningful when and have the same sign (both negative or both positive), because only then does spontaneity actually depend on . In the worked example, tells us the reaction stops being spontaneous once heated past that point — useful for predicting how a process behaves across a temperature range rather than at one fixed value.