Measurement of $\Delta U$ and $\Delta H$
Thermodynamics gives chemists two numbers to describe the energy of a reaction — , the change in internal energy, and , the change in enthalpy — but a formula on paper is not a measurement. How do you actually put a joule value on the heat released when sugar burns, or when an acid neutralises a base in a beaker? The answer is calorimetry: trap the heat, let it warm a known mass of water, and read off the temperature rise. The trick that makes calorimetry chemically precise is controlling what stays constant while the reaction happens. Seal the reaction in a rigid steel bomb and volume is fixed, so the heat measured is exactly . Run the same reaction open to the atmosphere and pressure is fixed, so the heat measured is exactly . This article shows how each calorimeter works, derives the formula linking the two measured quantities, and works a full numerical example using the exact bomb-calorimeter data from the previous article.
A bomb calorimeter (constant volume) measures directly as , an open calorimeter (constant pressure) measures directly as , and the two are related by .
The core idea
Calorimetry rests on one physical fact: energy is conserved. Heat that a reaction releases does not vanish — it flows into the calorimeter and its contents, usually water, and shows up as a measurable rise in temperature. Run the arithmetic backwards, from the temperature rise to the heat, and from the heat (with the right constant-volume or constant-pressure condition) to or .
The bomb calorimeter measures . A combustion reaction is sealed, with excess oxygen, inside a thick-walled steel vessel called a "bomb," which is then submerged in a known mass of water inside an insulated jacket. The rigid steel walls cannot expand or contract, so the volume of the system is fixed throughout the reaction. Because and , no work is done (), and the first law collapses to — the heat measured at constant volume is the internal-energy change, with no correction needed. The heat itself is found from how much the surrounding water and the calorimeter hardware warmed up:
where: is the mass of water surrounding the bomb, is its specific heat capacity, is the heat capacity of the bomb assembly itself (obtained separately by calibration, and often small enough to neglect), and is the observed temperature rise.
The open (coffee-cup) calorimeter measures . Reactions in solution — neutralisations, dissolutions, dilutions — are usually carried out in a simple insulated cup open to the atmosphere, so the pressure stays fixed at atmospheric pressure throughout. At constant pressure, the heat exchanged with the surroundings equals the enthalpy change directly: . The heat is again read from a temperature change, this time of the solution itself:
where: and are the mass and specific heat capacity of the solution (commonly taken as those of water, since the solutions are dilute and aqueous), and is the temperature change measured in the cup. The figure below lines the two setups up side by side: the sealed bomb pins volume constant and reads out ; the open cup pins pressure constant and reads out .
The core idea continued
The key distinction to hold onto is which variable is pinned down: a rigid bomb pins volume, so its heat reading is ; an open vessel pins pressure, so its heat reading is . Whenever a question hands you a value from one type of calorimeter but asks for the other quantity, a conversion is needed, and that conversion is the derivation below.
A bomb calorimeter always reports , yet many reactions are more naturally described by , so chemists need a formula that converts one into the other using only quantities already at hand — the amounts of gas involved and the temperature; the goal here is to derive that formula, , from the definition of enthalpy and the ideal gas law, and then check what it predicts for the combustion of glucose already measured above.
Step 1. Start from the definition of enthalpy, . For a reaction at temperature , the enthalpy change is , where is the change in the product of pressure and volume between products and reactants.
Step 2. Only the gaseous species contribute a significant, easily calculable term — solids and liquids have negligible volume by comparison. For an ideal gas, , so at constant temperature the change in for the gaseous part of the reaction is , where is the change in the number of moles of gas.
Step 3. Define precisely: it is (moles of gaseous products) minus (moles of gaseous reactants), read directly off the balanced equation. Substituting Step 2 into Step 1 gives the working formula, , connecting the bomb-calorimeter quantity to the constant-pressure quantity through a term that needs only , , and .
Step 4. Apply it to glucose combustion, . Gaseous moles on the product side: (CO₂). Gaseous moles on the reactant side: (O₂). So , and the correction term vanishes: for this particular reaction. This is not a coincidence to expect in general — it happens here because combustion of glucose produces exactly as many moles of gas as it consumes. Check: for a reaction with at , the correction is — a small but non-zero shift, confirming the formula gives a sensible, modest correction relative to typical reaction enthalpies of hundreds of kJ per mole.
Worked example
Problem: When of glucose (, molar mass ) is completely burnt in a bomb calorimeter, the temperature of of surrounding water (specific heat ) rises by ; the heat capacity of the calorimeter itself is negligible. Find the molar internal energy of combustion, and then use it to find the molar enthalpy of combustion.
Step 1. Heat absorbed by the water: .
Step 2. This heat was released by burning of glucose, so the heat released per gram is (negative because the reaction releases heat to the surroundings).
Step 3. Since the bomb operates at constant volume, for the reaction. Scaling to one mole (): .
Step 4. Convert to using the derivation above. Glucose combustion has , so the correction term vanishes and . The molar internal energy of combustion of glucose is , and because for this reaction, the molar enthalpy of combustion is also .
Competitive stretch
If the same had instead come from a reaction with at , the correction would be , giving — enthalpy is slightly less negative than internal energy here because expanding gas does work on the surroundings, an energy cost that (constant volume) never has to pay.
Common traps
- Assuming a bomb calorimeter measures directly — it measures , because volume is held constant, not pressure.
- Forgetting the sign convention: heat released by the reaction is heat absorbed by the calorimeter and water, so .
- Applying with the mass of the reacting sample instead of the mass of the water or solution — the temperature-change term belongs to the calorimeter contents, not the burning or reacting sample.
- Using with counting all species instead of only gaseous ones, or forgetting to convert temperature to kelvin before multiplying by .
Ask the tutor: Want a mixed set of bomb-calorimeter and open-calorimeter problems, including a few where so you get practice applying the correction term?
Why does a bomb calorimeter need such thick steel walls instead of a simple beaker?
Combustion reactions release heat fast and can build up considerable pressure as gases are produced and the temperature spikes, so the vessel must be strong enough to safely contain that pressure without deforming. Just as important for the chemistry, rigid walls guarantee the volume genuinely cannot change during the reaction, which is exactly the condition needed for and to hold. A flimsy or flexible container would let the volume shift slightly, and the heat measured would no longer be a clean measurement of .
If delta n of gas is zero, does that mean delta U and delta H are always equal for that reaction?
Yes, whenever the correction term in vanishes exactly, so for that specific reaction — glucose combustion is one example, since six moles of gaseous CO2 replace six moles of gaseous O2. This is a property of that particular balanced equation, though, not a general rule; a reaction like the combustion of solid carbon to CO2 gas has , and reactions that consume more gas moles than they produce have negative, so the two quantities differ by a nonzero, calculable amount in most other cases.
Why is the correction term delta n of gas times R times T, and not something involving the liquid or solid volumes?
The correction comes from , which follows from the ideal gas law applied only to the gaseous species in the reaction. Solids and liquids do have some volume, but it is thousands of times smaller than the volume a mole of gas occupies at the same conditions, so their contribution to is negligible by comparison and is dropped. That is also why only gaseous moles are counted when working out — a solid reactant turning into a solid product contributes nothing to the correction, even though the total number of moles of "stuff" has changed.