Measurement of $\Delta U$ and $\Delta H$

Thermodynamics gives chemists two numbers to describe the energy of a reaction — ΔU\Delta U, the change in internal energy, and ΔH\Delta H, the change in enthalpy — but a formula on paper is not a measurement. How do you actually put a joule value on the heat released when sugar burns, or when an acid neutralises a base in a beaker? The answer is calorimetry: trap the heat, let it warm a known mass of water, and read off the temperature rise. The trick that makes calorimetry chemically precise is controlling what stays constant while the reaction happens. Seal the reaction in a rigid steel bomb and volume is fixed, so the heat measured is exactly ΔU\Delta U. Run the same reaction open to the atmosphere and pressure is fixed, so the heat measured is exactly ΔH\Delta H. This article shows how each calorimeter works, derives the formula linking the two measured quantities, and works a full numerical example using the exact bomb-calorimeter data from the previous article.

The core insight

A bomb calorimeter (constant volume) measures ΔU\Delta U directly as qvq_v, an open calorimeter (constant pressure) measures ΔH\Delta H directly as qpq_p, and the two are related by ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT.

The core idea

Calorimetry rests on one physical fact: energy is conserved. Heat that a reaction releases does not vanish — it flows into the calorimeter and its contents, usually water, and shows up as a measurable rise in temperature. Run the arithmetic backwards, from the temperature rise to the heat, and from the heat (with the right constant-volume or constant-pressure condition) to ΔU\Delta U or ΔH\Delta H.

The bomb calorimeter measures ΔU\Delta U. A combustion reaction is sealed, with excess oxygen, inside a thick-walled steel vessel called a "bomb," which is then submerged in a known mass of water inside an insulated jacket. The rigid steel walls cannot expand or contract, so the volume of the system is fixed throughout the reaction. Because w=−PΔVw = -P\Delta V and ΔV=0\Delta V = 0, no work is done (w=0w = 0), and the first law ΔU=q+w\Delta U = q + w collapses to ΔU=qv\Delta U = q_v — the heat measured at constant volume is the internal-energy change, with no correction needed. The heat itself is found from how much the surrounding water and the calorimeter hardware warmed up:

qv=(mwater cwater+Ccalorimeter) ΔTq_v = (m_{water}\,c_{water} + C_{calorimeter})\,\Delta T

where: mwaterm_{water} is the mass of water surrounding the bomb, cwater=4.18 J g−1K−1c_{water} = 4.18\ \text{J g}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1} is its specific heat capacity, CcalorimeterC_{calorimeter} is the heat capacity of the bomb assembly itself (obtained separately by calibration, and often small enough to neglect), and ΔT\Delta T is the observed temperature rise.

The open (coffee-cup) calorimeter measures ΔH\Delta H. Reactions in solution — neutralisations, dissolutions, dilutions — are usually carried out in a simple insulated cup open to the atmosphere, so the pressure stays fixed at atmospheric pressure throughout. At constant pressure, the heat exchanged with the surroundings equals the enthalpy change directly: qp=ΔHq_p = \Delta H. The heat is again read from a temperature change, this time of the solution itself:

qp=mcΔTq_p = mc\Delta T

where: mm and cc are the mass and specific heat capacity of the solution (commonly taken as those of water, since the solutions are dilute and aqueous), and ΔT\Delta T is the temperature change measured in the cup. The figure below lines the two setups up side by side: the sealed bomb pins volume constant and reads out ΔU\Delta U; the open cup pins pressure constant and reads out ΔH\Delta H.

Figure
Two calorimeters side by side, a sealed steel bomb in a water bath labelled constant volume giving delta U, and an open insulated cup labelled constant pressure giving delta H
Two calorimeters, two constants, two quantities Bomb calorimeter bomb fixed V water bath constant volume q_v = ΔU Coffee-cup calorimeter solution, open to atmospheric pressure constant pressure q_p = ΔH Rigid steel walls fix volume so no P–V work is done; the open cup fixes pressure instead.

The core idea continued

The key distinction to hold onto is which variable is pinned down: a rigid bomb pins volume, so its heat reading is ΔU\Delta U; an open vessel pins pressure, so its heat reading is ΔH\Delta H. Whenever a question hands you a value from one type of calorimeter but asks for the other quantity, a conversion is needed, and that conversion is the derivation below.

Derivation AFrom ΔU\Delta U to ΔH\Delta H: the correction term ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT

A bomb calorimeter always reports ΔU\Delta U, yet many reactions are more naturally described by ΔH\Delta H, so chemists need a formula that converts one into the other using only quantities already at hand — the amounts of gas involved and the temperature; the goal here is to derive that formula, ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT, from the definition of enthalpy and the ideal gas law, and then check what it predicts for the combustion of glucose already measured above.

Step 1. Start from the definition of enthalpy, H=U+PVH = U + PV. For a reaction at temperature TT, the enthalpy change is ΔH=ΔU+Δ(PV)\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta(PV), where Δ(PV)\Delta(PV) is the change in the product of pressure and volume between products and reactants.

Step 2. Only the gaseous species contribute a significant, easily calculable Δ(PV)\Delta(PV) term — solids and liquids have negligible volume by comparison. For an ideal gas, PV=ngRTPV = n_gRT, so at constant temperature the change in PVPV for the gaseous part of the reaction is Δ(PV)=Δng RT\Delta(PV) = \Delta n_g\,RT, where Δng\Delta n_g is the change in the number of moles of gas.

Step 3. Define Δng\Delta n_g precisely: it is (moles of gaseous products) minus (moles of gaseous reactants), read directly off the balanced equation. Substituting Step 2 into Step 1 gives the working formula, ΔH=ΔU+Δng RT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g\,RT, connecting the bomb-calorimeter quantity ΔU\Delta U to the constant-pressure quantity ΔH\Delta H through a term that needs only Δng\Delta n_g, RR, and TT.

Step 4. Apply it to glucose combustion, C6H12O6(s)+6O2(g)→6CO2(g)+6H2O(l)\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6(s) + 6\text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow 6\text{CO}_2(g) + 6\text{H}_2\text{O}(l). Gaseous moles on the product side: 66 (CO₂). Gaseous moles on the reactant side: 66 (O₂). So Δng=6−6=0\Delta n_g = 6 - 6 = 0, and the correction term vanishes: ΔH=ΔU\Delta H = \Delta U for this particular reaction. This is not a coincidence to expect in general — it happens here because combustion of glucose produces exactly as many moles of gas as it consumes. Check: for a reaction with Δng=−1\Delta n_g = -1 at T=298 KT = 298\ \text{K}, the correction is ΔngRT=(−1)(8.314 J mol−1K−1)(298 K)=−2478 J mol−1≈−2.5 kJ mol−1\Delta n_g RT = (-1)(8.314\ \text{J mol}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1})(298\ \text{K}) = -2478\ \text{J mol}^{-1} \approx -2.5\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1} — a small but non-zero shift, confirming the formula gives a sensible, modest correction relative to typical reaction enthalpies of hundreds of kJ per mole.

Worked example

Problem: When 1.0 g1.0\ \text{g} of glucose (C6H12O6\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6, molar mass 180 g mol−1180\ \text{g mol}^{-1}) is completely burnt in a bomb calorimeter, the temperature of 1000 g1000\ \text{g} of surrounding water (specific heat 4.18 J g−1K−14.18\ \text{J g}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}) rises by 3.14 K3.14\ \text{K}; the heat capacity of the calorimeter itself is negligible. Find the molar internal energy of combustion, and then use it to find the molar enthalpy of combustion.

Step 1. Heat absorbed by the water: q=mcΔT=(1000 g)(4.18 J g−1K−1)(3.14 K)=13,125 J≈13.1 kJq = mc\Delta T = (1000\ \text{g})(4.18\ \text{J g}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1})(3.14\ \text{K}) = 13{,}125\ \text{J} \approx 13.1\ \text{kJ}.

Step 2. This heat was released by burning 1.0 g1.0\ \text{g} of glucose, so the heat released per gram is −13.1 kJ g−1-13.1\ \text{kJ g}^{-1} (negative because the reaction releases heat to the surroundings).

Step 3. Since the bomb operates at constant volume, ΔU=qv\Delta U = q_v for the reaction. Scaling to one mole (180 g180\ \text{g}): ΔU=−13.1 kJ g−1×180 g mol−1=−2358 kJ mol−1\Delta U = -13.1\ \text{kJ g}^{-1} \times 180\ \text{g mol}^{-1} = -2358\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}.

Step 4. Convert to ΔH\Delta H using the derivation above. Glucose combustion has Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0, so the correction term ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT vanishes and ΔH=ΔU\Delta H = \Delta U. The molar internal energy of combustion of glucose is −2358 kJ mol−1-2358\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}, and because Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0 for this reaction, the molar enthalpy of combustion is also −2358 kJ mol−1-2358\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}.

Competitive stretch

If the same −2358 kJ mol−1-2358\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1} had instead come from a reaction with Δng=+2\Delta n_g = +2 at T=300 KT = 300\ \text{K}, the correction would be ΔngRT=(2)(8.314)(300)=4988 J mol−1≈+5.0 kJ mol−1\Delta n_g RT = (2)(8.314)(300) = 4988\ \text{J mol}^{-1} \approx +5.0\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}, giving ΔH=−2358+5.0=−2353 kJ mol−1\Delta H = -2358 + 5.0 = -2353\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1} — enthalpy is slightly less negative than internal energy here because expanding gas does work on the surroundings, an energy cost that ΔU\Delta U (constant volume) never has to pay.

Common traps

  • Assuming a bomb calorimeter measures ΔH\Delta H directly — it measures ΔU\Delta U, because volume is held constant, not pressure.
  • Forgetting the sign convention: heat released by the reaction is heat absorbed by the calorimeter and water, so qreaction=−qwaterq_{reaction} = -q_{water}.
  • Applying q=mcΔTq = mc\Delta T with the mass of the reacting sample instead of the mass of the water or solution — the temperature-change term belongs to the calorimeter contents, not the burning or reacting sample.
  • Using ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT with Δng\Delta n_g counting all species instead of only gaseous ones, or forgetting to convert temperature to kelvin before multiplying by RR.

Ask the tutor: Want a mixed set of bomb-calorimeter and open-calorimeter problems, including a few where Δng≠0\Delta n_g \neq 0 so you get practice applying the correction term?

Why does a bomb calorimeter need such thick steel walls instead of a simple beaker?

Combustion reactions release heat fast and can build up considerable pressure as gases are produced and the temperature spikes, so the vessel must be strong enough to safely contain that pressure without deforming. Just as important for the chemistry, rigid walls guarantee the volume genuinely cannot change during the reaction, which is exactly the condition needed for w=0w = 0 and ΔU=qv\Delta U = q_v to hold. A flimsy or flexible container would let the volume shift slightly, and the heat measured would no longer be a clean measurement of ΔU\Delta U.

If delta n of gas is zero, does that mean delta U and delta H are always equal for that reaction?

Yes, whenever Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0 the correction term ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT in ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT vanishes exactly, so ΔH=ΔU\Delta H = \Delta U for that specific reaction — glucose combustion is one example, since six moles of gaseous CO2 replace six moles of gaseous O2. This is a property of that particular balanced equation, though, not a general rule; a reaction like the combustion of solid carbon to CO2 gas has Δng=1\Delta n_g = 1, and reactions that consume more gas moles than they produce have Δng\Delta n_g negative, so the two quantities differ by a nonzero, calculable amount in most other cases.

Why is the correction term delta n of gas times R times T, and not something involving the liquid or solid volumes?

The correction comes from Δ(PV)=ΔngRT\Delta(PV) = \Delta n_g RT, which follows from the ideal gas law PV=ngRTPV = n_gRT applied only to the gaseous species in the reaction. Solids and liquids do have some volume, but it is thousands of times smaller than the volume a mole of gas occupies at the same conditions, so their contribution to Δ(PV)\Delta(PV) is negligible by comparison and is dropped. That is also why only gaseous moles are counted when working out Δng\Delta n_g — a solid reactant turning into a solid product contributes nothing to the correction, even though the total number of moles of "stuff" has changed.

Before this

Where this leads