Hyperbola latus rectum
Every hyperbola carries a hidden "width" measurement at each focus — a vertical chord called the latus rectum, the same idea that shows up for the ellipse and the parabola but with the hyperbola's own twist. Slice the curve with a vertical line through a focus and you get a chord of length — a formula that looks identical to the ellipse's, yet behaves completely differently because a hyperbola places no ceiling on relative to . This article derives that length from scratch, ties it to eccentricity, and works through the two standard problem types — equation to length, and length back to and — that CBSE Class 11 expects you to handle confidently in the Conic Sections chapter.
The latus rectum of is the focal chord perpendicular to the transverse axis, and its length is , equivalently .
The core idea
Definition. The latus rectum is a chord through a focus, drawn perpendicular to the transverse axis (the -axis, for our standard hyperbola). By symmetry, a hyperbola has two latus recta of equal length — one through each focus and , where .
Why it has a clean formula. Because the latus rectum is a vertical chord at a fixed -value (), finding its endpoints is just a matter of substituting into the hyperbola's equation and solving for . The two resulting -values, being equal and opposite, hand you the chord length directly — no calculus needed, just algebra. This is exactly the same strategy used for the ellipse's latus rectum, and it is a technique worth remembering in its own right: whenever a chord is described as passing through a named point and being perpendicular to an axis, fixing that coordinate and solving the conic's equation for the other variable is usually the fastest route to its endpoints.
Why the topic matters in the syllabus. CBSE Class 11 treats the latus rectum, alongside the standard equation and the eccentricity formula, as one of three "simple properties" every student must be able to state and derive for the hyperbola. It is a small, self-contained result — a handful of algebraic steps — but it is tested often because it combines two skills at once: substituting into a conic's equation, and using the axis–focus relation correctly. Getting comfortable with this derivation also pays off when the same chord-through-a-focus idea reappears for the parabola later in the same chapter.
Endpoints. Substituting into and using gives , so the endpoints are and . Their vertical separation is the length:
where: is the length of the latus rectum, is the semi-transverse axis (distance from centre to vertex), and is the semi-conjugate axis appearing in the standard equation.
In terms of eccentricity. Since follows from , the same length can be written as
where: is the eccentricity of the hyperbola ( always). This form is handy whenever a problem states directly instead of .
The key contrast with the ellipse. For an ellipse, is enforced, so the latus rectum is always shorter than the major axis . A hyperbola has no such restriction — can exceed freely — so its latus rectum can be shorter than, equal to, or longer than the transverse axis , and it has no fixed upper bound at all. Set and you get , the "rectangular hyperbola" case, where the latus rectum exactly equals the transverse axis — a useful reference point to keep in mind when checking whether a given hyperbola's latus rectum looks unusually large or small.
Where the two latus recta sit. The full picture has two identical chords, one at through the right focus and one at through the left focus, each of length , positioned symmetrically about the centre. A problem that asks for "the latus rectum" (singular) is really asking for this common length, since both chords are congruent — you never need to compute them separately.
The goal is to find the length of the chord through the focus of the hyperbola that is perpendicular to the transverse axis, expressing the answer purely in terms of and — this is the one formula CBSE names explicitly as a "simple property" of the hyperbola, alongside its standard equation and eccentricity.
Step 1. Identify the chord's line. A chord perpendicular to the transverse axis (the -axis) and passing through the focus is simply the vertical line , where is the focal distance from the centre.
Step 2. Substitute into the hyperbola's equation. This gives , so .
Step 3. Use the hyperbola's axis–focus relation (note the plus sign in , unlike the ellipse's minus sign) to simplify: , hence , so .
Step 4. Read off the endpoints and the length. The chord meets the hyperbola at and , so its length is the difference of the -coordinates: . This is the length of one latus rectum; the second, at , has the same length by symmetry.
Worked example
Problem. Find the length of the latus rectum of the hyperbola , and verify the result using eccentricity.
Step 1. Read off so , and .
Step 2. Apply the formula: .
Step 3. Verify via eccentricity. Compute , so and . Then , and , matching Step 2 exactly.
Answer: the latus rectum has length .
Competitive stretch
A hyperbola has transverse axis and latus rectum . Step 1. . Step 2. From , get , so . Step 3. , so . Step 4. Check: , matching the given latus rectum. Answer: , .
Common traps
- Substituting (the vertex) instead of (the focus) — the latus rectum must pass through a focus, not a vertex.
- Using the ellipse's relation instead of the hyperbola's , which gives the wrong endpoints entirely.
- Assuming the latus rectum must be shorter than the transverse axis — true for the ellipse, not guaranteed for the hyperbola since has no upper bound relative to .
- Using the ellipse's eccentricity shortcut instead of the hyperbola's — the sign inside the bracket flips because for an ellipse but for a hyperbola.
- Forgetting that a hyperbola has two latus recta of equal length — a question that says "find the latus recta" (plural) still just wants the one value , quoted once, since both chords are congruent by symmetry.
Ask the tutor: Want to see this latus-rectum derivation done side by side with the ellipse's, so the one-sign difference becomes completely clear?
Why does the same formula 2b squared over a work for both the ellipse and the hyperbola?
Both derivations follow the identical procedure — substitute the focus's -coordinate into the conic's equation and solve for — so the algebra lands on the same shape of answer, . What differs is the relation between , and : the ellipse uses (so always, capping the latus rectum below ), while the hyperbola uses (so is unrestricted, and the latus rectum can exceed ). Same formula, very different behaviour, because the underlying constraint on is different.
How is the latus rectum different from the transverse and conjugate axes?
The transverse axis, length , joins the two vertices and lies along the axis of symmetry the hyperbola opens along; the conjugate axis, length , is perpendicular to it through the centre but does not touch the curve. The latus rectum, length , is a different chord altogether — it passes through a focus, not the centre, and is perpendicular to the transverse axis. All three are standard "named lengths" of the hyperbola, but only the latus rectum is anchored at a focus.
If I am given the eccentricity and a, can I find the latus rectum without ever computing b?
Yes — that is exactly the purpose of the eccentricity form. Since , the latus rectum is directly, skipping the intermediate step of finding . This is faster when a problem states and up front, while the plain form is faster when the equation already gives you and directly. Either route must give the same number, so if you have both and available, computing the length both ways is a quick, free consistency check on your working.