Inequalities
A math test asks you to solve and you write down one number. A math test asks you to solve and one number is not enough — you need to describe an entire range of numbers that make the statement true. That is the shift this chapter makes: from equations, which pin down a single value, to inequalities, which describe a set of values using the symbols , , and in place of . This article builds the vocabulary and the three algebraic rules that every later topic in the chapter — solving linear inequalities, graphing them on a number line, and handling systems of two inequalities — depends on. The single most exam-costly idea here is what happens when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number: the inequality sign must flip. Get comfortable with why that happens and you avoid the most common mistake in the entire Linear Inequalities chapter.
An inequality compares two expressions with instead of , describing a whole interval of solutions rather than one value, and its algebra obeys the same addition/subtraction rules as equations except that multiplying or dividing by a negative number reverses the inequality sign.
The core idea
The four symbols. For real numbers and , means is strictly less than , means is strictly greater than , while and allow equality as well as the strict case. The strict symbols () exclude the boundary value; the slack symbols () include it — a distinction that matters the moment you mark an endpoint on a number line or write an interval.
Linear inequality in one variable. This chapter's central object has the form
where: is the unknown, and are real constants with . Its solution set is every value of that makes the statement true. Unlike , which usually has exactly one root, a linear inequality typically has infinitely many solutions, filling an entire stretch of the real line.
From inequality to interval. The solution set is written as the open interval ; the parentheses signal that and themselves are excluded. The set is the closed interval , and a mixed case like is the half-open interval . A compact expression such as is really two conditions joined into one line — and simultaneously — and this double inequality notation reappears constantly once systems of inequalities enter the picture.
Three rules governing inequalities
Rule 1 — shifting. Adding or subtracting the same number on both sides preserves the inequality: if , then and for any real .
Rule 2 — scaling by a positive number. Multiplying or dividing both sides by the same positive number preserves the inequality: if and , then .
Rule 3 — scaling by a negative number. Multiplying or dividing both sides by the same negative number reverses the inequality: if and , then . This third rule is the single most important — and most often forgotten — fact in the whole chapter, and it is the one proved carefully below.
The goal is to prove, using nothing beyond Rule 1 and the definition of "less than" as a positive gap on the number line, that whenever and is a negative real number, multiplying both sides by forces rather than — so the flip is not a memorised trick but a logical consequence of what "less than" means.
Step 1. Restate as a statement about a positive gap. Saying means is a positive number; call it . Every true inequality can be read this way: the right side minus the left side is positive.
Step 2. Write as a negative number and set , so . Any negative can be written this way, with the positive number obtained by flipping its sign; for instance gives .
Step 3. Compute and show it is negative. . Since and , the product is positive, so is negative. That means , which is the same statement as .
Step 4. Read the result. Starting from , multiplying both sides by a negative produced — the inequality sign reversed. Nothing about this depended on the particular numbers chosen; it holds for every negative , because a negative multiplier always turns a positive gap into a negative one. This is exactly Rule 3, and it is why a solved inequality like must have its sign flipped to the moment both sides are divided by .
Worked example
If is a true statement, apply Rule 3 to find the correct inequality after multiplying both sides by , then use that result to solve for .
Step 1. Start with the true inequality and multiply both sides by , a negative number, so by Rule 3 the inequality must reverse: , and the correct relation is .
Step 2. Check it numerically: is indeed greater than , confirming the reversal was necessary — had the sign been left as , that would be a false statement, exactly the trap Rule 3 prevents.
Step 3. Now apply the same rule to solve . Divide both sides by (a negative number), so the inequality must reverse from to : , giving .
Step 4. Verify with a test value: pick , which satisfies . Substituting into the original inequality gives , and indeed is true. Pick itself: , and is false, confirming is correctly excluded. The solution set is , written in interval notation as .
Common traps
- Forgetting to reverse the sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative number — the single most common error in the chapter, especially when a variable's coefficient is negative, as in .
- Treating and as identical — includes as a solution while does not, which changes whether an interval or number-line endpoint is open or closed.
- Assuming an inequality has one unique solution like an equation does — a linear inequality in one variable almost always has infinitely many solutions forming an interval, not a single point.
- Squaring both sides without checking signs — squaring preserves direction only when both sides are known to be non-negative; this becomes relevant once inequalities combine with other operations later in the chapter.
Ask the tutor: still unsure why multiplying by a negative number flips the inequality sign, or want to practice converting between inequality notation and interval notation? Ask the AI tutor to walk through more examples with you.
Why does multiplying by a negative number flip the inequality, but adding a negative number does not?
Adding or subtracting shifts both sides by the same amount, so the gap between them stays the same size and sign — the order does not change. Multiplying by a negative number is different: it flips every number's position relative to zero, so the larger of two numbers becomes the smaller after multiplication. The derivation above shows this precisely — the positive gap becomes negative once multiplied by a negative , which is exactly what forces the inequality sign to reverse.
Does a linear inequality always have infinitely many solutions?
For a genuine linear inequality like with , yes — the solution is always an interval containing infinitely many real numbers, not a single value. This is very different from a linear equation , which almost always has exactly one solution. Occasionally a problem disguised as an inequality reduces to something like (true for every ) or (true for no ), but a proper linear inequality in still describes a whole range of values.
How do I know whether to use round brackets or square brackets when writing the solution as an interval?
Match the bracket to the symbol. A strict inequality ( or ) excludes its boundary value, so it gets a round bracket, as in written . A slack inequality ( or ) includes its boundary, so it gets a square bracket, as in written . The same logic carries over to number-line diagrams: an open circle for a strict boundary, a filled circle for a slack one.