Electrolytic Cells and Electrolysis

Dip two wires into molten aluminium oxide, connect them to a battery, and something the reaction would never do on its own starts happening: aluminium metal plates out at one electrode, oxygen bubbles off the other. No spontaneous chemistry drives this — the battery is forcing it, paying with electrical energy for a reaction that has negative spontaneity on its own. This is electrolysis, and the device that hosts it is an electrolytic cell, the mirror image of the galvanic cell you met earlier in this unit. What makes electrolysis genuinely useful — for electroplating jewellery, refining copper, or extracting aluminium — is that it is quantitatively predictable. Pass a known current for a known time and Faraday's laws tell you, in advance, exactly how many grams of metal will appear or how many litres of gas will form. This article builds that formula from Faraday's two laws, applies it to two classic numericals (aluminium deposition, then a "how long" problem), and flags the traps — polarity confusion and unit slips — that cost the most marks.

The core insight

An external battery forces electrons onto the cathode (reduction) and pulls them off the anode (oxidation) in an electrolytic cell, and Faraday's laws convert the charge passed, Q=ItQ = It, directly into the mass of product via w=ItMnFw = \dfrac{ItM}{nF}.

The core idea

An electrolytic cell consists of two electrodes dipped in an electrolyte (molten or aqueous) and wired to an external DC source. The source, not the chemistry, decides which electrode gains electrons and which loses them.

  • Cathode — wired to the negative terminal, flooded with electrons, so reduction happens here: cations are reduced or deposited.
  • Anode — wired to the positive terminal, electrons withdrawn, so oxidation happens here: anions are oxidised, or the electrode material itself may dissolve.

Compare this with a galvanic cell, where the spontaneous reaction itself sets the anode negative and the cathode positive. The polarities swap between the two cell types, but one thing never changes: oxidation is always at the anode, reduction is always at the cathode, in both. For molten NaCl, the cathode reaction is Na++e−→Na(l)\text{Na}^+ + e^- \rightarrow \text{Na}(l) and the anode reaction is 2Cl−→Cl2(g)+2e−2\text{Cl}^- \rightarrow \text{Cl}_2(g) + 2e^-. In aqueous solutions water itself can be preferentially oxidised or reduced instead of the dissolved ions, a qualitative nuance worth knowing even without full quantitative treatment.

Figure
A simple electrolytic cell diagram showing a battery connected to a cathode where cations gain electrons and an anode where anions lose electrons, with current flowing through the electrolyte between them
Electrolytic cell — battery forces reduction at cathode, oxidation at anode battery + - electrolyte anode oxidation cathode reduction cation to cathode anion to anode

Faraday's First Law: the mass deposited or liberated at an electrode is directly proportional to the charge passed, w∝Qw \propto Q, so w=ZQw = ZQ, where ZZ is the electrochemical equivalent and Q=ItQ = It (current in amperes times time in seconds gives coulombs).

Faraday's Second Law: when the same charge passes through different electrolytes connected in series, the masses liberated are proportional to their chemical equivalent weights. Combining both laws with the Faraday constant, F=96,500 C mol−1F = 96{,}500\ \text{C mol}^{-1} (the charge on one mole of electrons), gives the working formula used for every numerical in this topic:

w=Q MnF=ItMnFw = \frac{Q\,M}{nF} = \frac{ItM}{nF}

where: ww = mass deposited or liberated (g), MM = molar mass of the substance (g mol⁻¹), nn = number of electrons transferred per ion in the balanced electrode half-reaction, II = current (A), tt = time (s), F=96,500 C mol−1F = 96{,}500\ \text{C mol}^{-1}.

Derivation AFaraday's-law formula from first principles

The goal of this derivation is to justify why the mass deposited works out to exactly w=ItM/(nF)w = ItM/(nF) and not some other combination of the four quantities II, tt, MM, nn — that is, to connect "charge passed" to "grams of metal" through the two ideas of moles of electrons and moles of substance.

Step 1. Start from Faraday's First Law in its raw form, w=ZQw = ZQ, where ZZ (the electrochemical equivalent) is simply the mass deposited per coulomb of charge for that particular substance. This law alone tells us mass and charge are proportional, but not what ZZ is made of chemically.

Step 2. Pin down ZZ using the mole concept. To deposit one mole of a substance whose electrode reaction needs nn electrons per ion (e.g. Al3++3e−→Al\text{Al}^{3+} + 3e^- \rightarrow \text{Al}, n=3n = 3), you must supply nn moles of electrons, and each mole of electrons carries a charge of F=96,500 CF = 96{,}500\ \text{C}. So one mole (MM grams) of product requires charge nFnF coulombs, which means Z=M/(nF)Z = M/(nF) grams per coulomb.

Step 3. Substitute Z=M/(nF)Z = M/(nF) back into w=ZQw = ZQ: w=MnF Q=QMnFw = \dfrac{M}{nF}\,Q = \dfrac{QM}{nF}. This is Faraday's Second Law folded in automatically — for a fixed QQ, different substances deposit masses proportional to M/nM/n, their equivalent weight.

Step 4. Replace QQ with ItIt since charge is current times time: w=ItMnFw = \dfrac{ItM}{nF}. Every quantity here is measurable — current from an ammeter, time from a clock, MM from the periodic table, nn from the balanced half-reaction, FF a universal constant — which is exactly why the formula lets you predict an electrolysis outcome rather than just describe one after the fact.

Worked example

Problem: A current of 2 A is passed through molten aluminium oxide for 1 hour. Calculate the mass of aluminium deposited at the cathode. (MAl=27 g mol−1M_{Al} = 27\ \text{g mol}^{-1})

Step 1. Write the cathode half-reaction and read off nn: Al3++3e−→Al(s)\text{Al}^{3+} + 3e^- \rightarrow \text{Al}(s), so n=3n = 3.

Step 2. Convert time to seconds and find the charge: t=1 h=3600 st = 1\ \text{h} = 3600\ \text{s}, so Q=It=2×3600=7200 CQ = It = 2 \times 3600 = 7200\ \text{C}.

Step 3. Apply the formula: w=Q MnF=7200×273×96,500=194,400289,500w = \dfrac{Q\,M}{nF} = \dfrac{7200 \times 27}{3 \times 96{,}500} = \dfrac{194{,}400}{289{,}500}.

Step 4. Evaluate: w≈0.67 g of aluminiumw \approx 0.67\ \text{g of aluminium} is deposited at the cathode.

Competitive stretch

The reverse question is just as common: how long must a current of 5 A flow through CuSO4\text{CuSO}_4 solution to deposit 1.27 g of copper (MCu=63.5 g mol−1M_{Cu} = 63.5\ \text{g mol}^{-1})? Here Cu2++2e−→Cu(s)\text{Cu}^{2+} + 2e^- \rightarrow \text{Cu}(s) gives n=2n = 2, so rearrange to t=w nFIM=1.27×2×96,5005×63.5=245,110317.5≈772 st = \dfrac{w\,nF}{IM} = \dfrac{1.27 \times 2 \times 96{,}500}{5 \times 63.5} = \dfrac{245{,}110}{317.5} \approx 772\ \text{s}, about 12.9 minutes.

Common traps

  • Swapping electrode polarity between galvanic and electrolytic cells. Oxidation is always at the anode and reduction always at the cathode in both — only the +/- sign of each electrode flips between the two cell types.
  • Using the wrong nn. Always write the balanced half-reaction first: n=1n = 1 for Ag⁺, n=2n = 2 for Cu²⁺, n=3n = 3 for Al³⁺. Guessing nn from the formula alone is a common source of wrong answers.
  • Forgetting to convert time to seconds before computing Q=ItQ = It, since FF is defined on a per-coulomb-second basis; using minutes or hours directly throws the answer off by orders of magnitude.
  • Assuming the cation with lowest reduction potential is always what deposits in aqueous electrolysis, without allowing that water itself may be oxidised or reduced preferentially — a qualitative point worth remembering even though full overpotential treatment is beyond this syllabus.

Ask the tutor: want to try a few more Faraday's-law numericals with different metals and gases, or work through how to predict which species gets discharged first in aqueous electrolysis?

Why does the cathode attract cations if it is not positively charged like in a galvanic cell

The pull on cations comes from the reduction reaction happening there, not from electrostatic attraction to a positive electrode. In an electrolytic cell the cathode is actually negative, because the battery has forced excess electrons onto it. Those electrons are exactly what a cation needs to be reduced, so cations migrate toward the cathode to pick them up and get deposited. The electrode's role as an electron source, not its charge sign, is what matters chemically.

Why do we need to convert time to seconds before using the Faraday's-law formula

The Faraday constant, F=96,500 C mol−1F = 96{,}500\ \text{C mol}^{-1}, is defined using the coulomb, and one coulomb is one ampere-second by definition. If tt is left in minutes or hours while II is in amperes, the product Q=ItQ = It will not actually be in coulombs, and every downstream number will be wrong by that same conversion factor. Always convert to seconds as the very first numerical step, before touching the main formula.

If electrolysis needs energy input, why is it useful at all

Because the products of electrolysis are often more valuable than the electrical energy spent making them, or simply cannot be obtained any other way. Aluminium extraction, electroplating a thin protective or decorative metal layer, and purifying (refining) copper by electrolysis are all industrial processes where the non-spontaneous reaction produces something worth paying electricity for. Faraday's laws let engineers calculate exactly how much current and time are needed for a target amount of product, which is what makes the process economically plannable rather than trial-and-error.

Before this

Where this leads