Lorentz force
A beam of electrons races through a narrow tube in an old television tube, an electric field trying to pull it one way, a magnetic field trying to bend it another. Only electrons moving at exactly the right speed sail straight through a slit at the far end — every faster or slower electron gets swept aside and lost. That knife-edge selection is not a coincidence of engineering; it is one equation deciding, charge by charge, which particles survive. That equation is the Lorentz force. Every charged particle in the universe carries a rulebook for how it responds to electric and magnetic fields. The electric part of that rulebook is old news from Class 11 electrostatics: a field pushes a charge with force , straight along the field line, whether the charge is sitting still or racing past at a million metres per second. The magnetic part is newer and stranger: a magnetic field only notices a charge that is moving, and when it does notice, it pushes sideways — perpendicular to both the velocity and the field — never speeding the charge up or slowing it down, only steering it. Put both pushes together into one vector sum and you get the complete, exact statement of the electromagnetic force on any charge: the Lorentz force law. This article builds that combined force up from its two known pieces, reads off what each piece can and cannot do to a moving charge, and then puts the whole expression to work in the velocity selector — the balancing act at the heart of mass spectrometers, cathode-ray tubes and any instrument that needs a beam of charges moving at one precise, chosen speed.
- The Lorentz force is the total electromagnetic force on a charge moving with velocity in a region with both an electric field and a magnetic field : .
- The electric part, , acts on a charge whether it moves or not, points along for a positive charge, and can speed the charge up or slow it down — it does work and changes kinetic energy.
- The magnetic part, , exists only when the charge moves, always acts perpendicular to , and never does work — it changes the direction of motion, never the speed.
- The two parts add as vectors, not as numbers — their relative direction, set by the geometry of , and , decides whether they reinforce, oppose, or combine at an angle.
- A velocity selector balances the two forces exactly. With , and mutually perpendicular and arranged so the two forces oppose, only charges moving at pass through undeflected, regardless of the charge's magnitude or sign.
- The magnetic-force part alone, , is the special case with no electric field present — this is the "magnetic force on a moving charge" studied as the building block just before this topic.
- Key idea: the Lorentz force combines an always-on electric push that can change a charge's speed with a velocity-dependent, sideways-only magnetic push that cannot, and setting the two pushes into exact opposition is what makes a velocity selector work.
The Lorentz force is the vector sum of an electric force that always acts and can change a charge's kinetic energy, and a magnetic force that acts only on motion, points perpendicular to that motion, and can only steer — never speed up or slow down — the charge.
Where it fits in the syllabus
In the CBSE Class 12 unit Moving Charges and Magnetism, the syllabus first establishes the magnetic force on a moving charge, , and then explicitly asks students to combine it with the familiar electric force into the single "Lorentz force" expression — this combined force is squarely in scope and is a standard short-answer and numerical topic. It sits as a bridge: it reuses electrostatics () from Class 11, reuses the freshly learned magnetic force on a moving charge, and feeds forward into force on a current-carrying conductor (where the same idea is summed over a whole wire of moving charges). The velocity-selector application, where the two forces are set to cancel, is the syllabus's standard worked scenario for this topic and is examined regularly; a full cyclotron treatment is not required here and is only ever quoted qualitatively elsewhere in the chapter, never derived from the Lorentz force in this article.
The physical picture
Picture a charge sitting inside a region carrying both a uniform electric field and a uniform magnetic field , and moving with velocity at the instant we look at it. Two independent forces act on it at once, and the total is their vector sum:
where: is the charge (in coulombs, with its own sign), is the electric field (volts per metre, or equivalently newtons per coulomb), is the instantaneous velocity of the charge (metres per second), is the magnetic field (tesla), and is the net force (newtons). Read term by term: the first piece, , is exactly the electrostatic force from Class 11 — it exists for a charge at rest just as much as for a moving one, and it points along (or opposite to it, if is negative). The second piece, , is new to this chapter and behaves completely differently — it vanishes the instant , and its direction is fixed by the cross product, always perpendicular to the plane containing and , with the right-hand rule (or the corkscrew rule) giving the sense for a positive charge, and the opposite sense for a negative one. The physical reading of "perpendicular to " is the single most important fact about the magnetic piece: a force that is always perpendicular to velocity can never have a component along the direction of motion, so it can never speed the charge up or slow it down — it does zero work, however strong is or however long the charge stays in the field. Only the electric piece can add or remove kinetic energy from the charge. This split — "electric force can do work, magnetic force cannot" — is worth memorising as a standalone fact, independent of any numerical problem.
A key application built directly on this splitting is the velocity selector: arrange , and mutually perpendicular, and orient the fields so that the electric force and the magnetic force point in exactly opposite directions. Because both forces are proportional to , the charge itself cancels out of the balance condition — the selector works the same way for any charge, positive or negative, light or heavy, as long as it is moving at the right speed. Only one speed satisfies the balance, and every charge moving at that speed sails straight through; every other speed leaves a net sideways force that deflects the charge out of the beam.
The goal is to find the one speed at which a charged particle travelling through mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields experiences exactly zero net Lorentz force and so travels in a straight line — this is the working principle behind any instrument (a mass spectrometer's entry stage, a cathode-ray tube's beam-purity check) that must deliver a beam of particles all moving at one chosen speed, regardless of their charge. We start from the full Lorentz force expression and impose the geometric condition that makes the two pieces oppose.
Step 1. Write the general Lorentz force with the fields set up as a velocity selector: points along one transverse direction, points along a second direction perpendicular to both and the particle's velocity , so that comes out anti-parallel to for the sign of charge under consideration. The total force is , and because the two field directions were chosen perpendicular to each other and to , both terms act along the same single line (the direction of ), just with opposite sign.
Step 2. Reduce the vector equation to a scalar one along that common line. Take magnitudes: the electric force has size , and since is perpendicular to the magnetic force has size (using ). With the two forces opposing, the net force along the line is .
Step 3. Impose the "undeflected" condition. A particle travels straight through only if the net force is exactly zero, so , which gives .
Step 4. Solve for the selected speed. The charge appears on both sides and cancels completely, leaving . This is the velocity-selector condition: it depends only on the field strengths, not on the charge's size or sign, so a beam containing a mixture of charges still gets sorted purely by speed — every charge moving at emerges undeflected, and every other speed is swept out of the beam by the leftover force.
Worked examples
Board level - undeflected speed through a velocity selector
An electron moving horizontally enters a region where a uniform electric field points vertically downward and a uniform magnetic field points into the page, both perpendicular to the electron's velocity. Find the speed at which the electron passes through undeflected.
Step 1. Recognise the setup as a velocity selector: for the electron to travel straight, the net Lorentz force must be zero, which requires the electric and magnetic forces to be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
Step 2. Apply the balance condition derived above: , so . The electron's charge cancels out of this relation, so the result holds regardless of the sign of the moving charge, provided the fields are oriented so the two forces oppose.
Step 3. Substitute the given values: .
Step 4. Sanity-check the answer. A speed of is about of the speed of light, safely in the non-relativistic regime assumed throughout this syllabus, so the classical Lorentz-force treatment used here is valid. The electron passes through undeflected at ; electrons moving faster or slower are deflected off this straight path.
Competitive level - full Lorentz force from perpendicular E and B on a moving charge
A charge moves with velocity along the -axis. It is in a region with along and along . Find the magnitude and direction of the total Lorentz force on the charge.
Step 1. Compute the electric part first, since it needs no cross product: , directed along (the same direction as , since is positive).
Step 2. Compute the magnetic part. Since (along ) is perpendicular to (along ), the angle between them is , so . Using , this magnetic force points along — directly opposite the electric force.
Step 3. Combine the two forces as vectors. Because both lie along the same -axis, they subtract rather than add at an angle: , directed along (the electric force wins since here).
Step 4. State the answer clearly, distinguishing it from the earlier velocity-selector example: here the two forces do not cancel — this charge is not moving at the special selector speed for these fields, so it experiences a net sideways-along- push and would be deflected. The Lorentz force has magnitude , directed along . Timing note: this is a two-minute problem if you keep the electric and magnetic pieces separate and only combine them at the very last step. The recurring trap is trying to add and as plain numbers before checking their directions from the cross product — always work out the direction of first (right-hand rule), then decide whether the two forces add, subtract, or need full vector addition at an angle.
Common traps
- Adding the electric and magnetic force magnitudes as plain numbers, , without first checking whether the two force vectors point the same way, opposite ways, or at an angle — they must be combined as vectors, using the actual geometry of , and in the problem.
- Believing the Lorentz force always does zero work on a charge — only the magnetic piece is guaranteed to do zero work; the electric piece routinely changes the charge's kinetic energy, and many exam questions hinge on exactly this distinction.
- Assuming the velocity-selector condition depends on the sign or size of the charge — it does not, since cancels out of ; the same fields select the same speed for an electron, a proton, or an alpha particle.
- Getting the cross-product order backwards and writing instead of — the two differ by a sign, so a flipped order silently reverses the predicted direction of the magnetic force.
- Forgetting that for a negative charge, both the electric force () and the magnetic force () reverse direction compared with a positive charge in the identical fields — the sign of must be carried through every term, not just the electric one.
You should be able to…
- Write the full Lorentz force expression and correctly identify which term is electric and which is magnetic.
- Explain why only the electric part of the Lorentz force can do work on a moving charge, and why the magnetic part never can.
- Derive the velocity-selector balance condition from first principles, starting from the full Lorentz force expression.
- Combine electric and magnetic force vectors correctly using the right-hand rule for , including cases where they are not simply parallel or antiparallel.
- Track the sign of a negative charge through both the electric and magnetic terms consistently, rather than only through one.
- Distinguish a pure magnetic-force problem (only present) from a full Lorentz-force problem where both and act together.
Ask the tutor: Want to see how the same velocity-selector balance condition feeds directly into finding a charge's mass in a simple mass-spectrometer setup — ask the AI tutor to walk through that next step and test you with a non-perpendicular field arrangement.
Why does the magnetic force need the charge to be moving, but the electric force does not?
Because the two forces come from genuinely different physics. The electric force is the ordinary Coulomb-type push a field exerts on any charge simply because the charge exists in that field — it acts on a charge sitting perfectly still just as strongly as on one that is racing past. The magnetic force , however, is built into a cross product with itself: if , the cross product is automatically zero, so there is nothing to push with. Physically, a magnetic field only "sees" charge in motion (which is, after all, current), which is exactly why a stationary charge sitting next to a magnet feels absolutely nothing from it.
If the magnetic force does no work, how does a magnetic field ever change a charge's kinetic energy in a real device?
It does not, and that is the point — in any situation where only a magnetic field is present, a charged particle's speed (and so its kinetic energy) stays exactly constant, however sharply it curves or circles. Any speeding up or slowing down you see in a real device — a particle accelerator, a cathode-ray tube gun — is always the work of an electric field somewhere in the setup, even if the magnetic field is doing the more visually dramatic job of bending the path. Whenever a problem states a charge's energy changed, look for the electric field responsible; the magnetic field is never the culprit.
Does the velocity-selector formula v = E/B change if the charge is negative instead of positive?
No — this is exactly why the formula is so useful. Both the electric force and the magnetic force carry the same factor of , so when you set them equal to find the balance speed, cancels completely out of the equation , leaving with no charge dependence at all. What does change for a negative charge is the direction each individual force points (both flip relative to a positive charge in the same fields), but since both flip together, they still cancel at the same speed. This is why a single velocity selector can sort a mixed beam of positive and negative charges by speed alone.
Is the cyclotron the same idea as the Lorentz force, and will I be asked to derive its frequency?
The cyclotron does use the magnetic part of the Lorentz force, , to bend a charged particle into a circular path while an alternating electric field speeds it up on each crossing — but a full quantitative treatment and derivation of the cyclotron frequency is not core content for this chapter's prescribed syllabus. You may see it mentioned qualitatively as one example of the magnetic force curving a moving charge, but you should not expect to derive its frequency formula from first principles here; that level of detail sits outside what this article (and the board exam, per the current syllabus) requires.