Torque on a current loop

Take a small rectangular coil of wire, connect it to a battery so a current flows round it, and lower it edge-first into the field of a horseshoe magnet. Nothing pushes it sideways. Instead it twists — the coil rotates about an axis through its centre, like a tiny door on hinges, until its plane settles perpendicular to the field and the twisting stops. Every electric motor on the planet, from a toy car to a metro train, is built on this one observation: a current loop in a magnetic field feels a torque, not a net force. This is the payoff idea of "Moving Charges and Magnetism." Earlier sections built the tools one at a time — the force F⃗=qv⃗×B⃗\vec F = q\vec v\times\vec B on a moving charge, then F⃗=Il⃗×B⃗\vec F = I\vec l\times\vec B on a current-carrying wire, then the force between two parallel wires. A current loop is nothing but four such wires joined into a closed rectangle, so this topic is an exercise in adding up four force vectors correctly and discovering that they cancel in one respect (net force is zero) while reinforcing in another (net torque survives). The result is a compact formula, τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta, that a board answer must state, derive, and apply numerically. Beyond the exam, this is the bridge to two ideas immediately ahead: the current loop as a magnetic dipole with moment m=NIAm = NIA, and the moving-coil galvanometer, which turns this very torque into a needle deflection. Get this derivation solid and both become one small extra step, not two new topics.

Key takeaways
  • A current-carrying loop placed in a uniform magnetic field experiences a net torque but zero net force — the field twists the loop without dragging it sideways.
  • For a planar loop of NN turns, each of area AA, carrying current II, in a uniform field BB, the torque magnitude is τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta, where θ\theta is the angle between the loop's normal (area vector) and B⃗\vec B.
  • In vector form this is τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B, where m⃗=NIA⃗\vec m = NI\vec A is the loop's magnetic moment — the same relation an electric dipole obeys with τ⃗=p⃗×E⃗\vec\tau = \vec p\times\vec E.
  • Torque is maximum (τmax=NIAB\tau_{max} = NIAB) when the loop's plane is parallel to B⃗\vec B (normal perpendicular to B⃗\vec B, θ=90°\theta = 90°), and zero when the loop's plane is perpendicular to B⃗\vec B (normal aligned with B⃗\vec B, θ=0°\theta = 0°, the stable equilibrium).
  • The formula comes from a genuine force-by-force analysis of the four sides of a rectangular loop: two sides feel forces along the same line (no torque, no rotation), the other two feel an equal-and-opposite pair separated by an arm of length bsin⁡θb\sin\theta, and that pair is the whole torque.
  • This exact torque, kept effectively constant over the full swing by a clever radial-field magnet design, is what makes the pointer of a moving-coil galvanometer deflect in proportion to the current passing through it.
  • Key idea: a uniform magnetic field exerts zero net force but a net torque τ=NIABsin⁡θ=∣m⃗×B⃗∣\tau = NIAB\sin\theta = |\vec m\times\vec B| on a current loop of magnetic moment m=NIAm = NIA, and this torque is the working principle shared by electric motors and the moving-coil galvanometer.
The core insight

A current loop of magnetic moment m=NIAm = NIA placed in a uniform field B⃗\vec B feels zero net force but a net torque τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B, of magnitude NIABsin⁡θNIAB\sin\theta, that is maximum when the loop's plane lies along the field and zero when it lies across it.

Where it fits in the syllabus

This sits at the close of the CBSE Class 12 unit Moving Charges and Magnetism, directly after the force on a current-carrying conductor and the force between two parallel wires — both of which this derivation reuses. The board syllabus explicitly lists "torque experienced by a current loop in uniform magnetic field" with the relation τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B, so both the formula and a working derivation for a rectangular loop are fair game in a five-mark question. It is deliberately positioned right before the current loop is reintroduced as a magnetic dipole and before the moving-coil galvanometer, so mastering the force-pair argument here pays off twice more within the same chapter.

The physical picture

Picture a rectangular loop of wire, sides of length aa (horizontal) and bb (vertical), carrying a steady current II, free to rotate about a vertical axis through its centre. A uniform magnetic field B⃗\vec B points horizontally, in the plane containing the rotation axis. Let θ\theta be the angle between the loop's normal n^\hat n — given by curling the right-hand fingers along the current and pointing the thumb — and B⃗\vec B; equivalently, θ\theta is also the angle between the field and the plane of the two vertical sides. Each straight side carries current in a magnetic field, so each feels a force F⃗=Il⃗×B⃗\vec F = I\vec l\times\vec B. The two horizontal sides (length aa) make the same angle with B⃗\vec B but carry current in opposite senses, so their forces are equal, opposite, and — crucially — collinear, acting along the same vertical line through the centre. Equal, opposite, collinear forces give zero net force and zero net torque from this pair; they merely try to stretch or compress the loop. The two vertical sides (length bb) are the ones that matter. Each feels a force of magnitude F=IbBF = IbB, directed horizontally, and because the currents in them run opposite ways, the two forces are equal and opposite too — so once again the net force is zero. But they do not act along the same line: they are separated, perpendicular to the force direction, by an arm of length asin⁡θa\sin\theta. An equal-and-opposite pair separated by a perpendicular arm is a couple, and a couple exerts a torque even with zero net force.

τ=F×(arm)=(IbB)(asin⁡θ)=I(ab)Bsin⁡θ=IABsin⁡θ\tau = F\times(\text{arm}) = (IbB)(a\sin\theta) = I(ab)B\sin\theta = IAB\sin\theta

where: F=IbBF = IbB is the magnitude of each of the two equal-and-opposite forces on the vertical sides, asin⁡θa\sin\theta is the perpendicular distance between their lines of action, and A=abA = ab is the area enclosed by the loop. For a coil of NN identical turns instead of a single loop, every turn contributes this same torque, so the total is NN times as large:

τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta

This scalar result is the magnitude of a vector relation. Define the loop's magnetic moment m⃗=NIA⃗\vec m = NI\vec A, a vector of magnitude NIANIA pointing along the normal n^\hat n (right-hand rule on the current direction). Then the torque on the loop in a uniform field is

τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B

where: m⃗\vec m is the magnetic moment (unit A ⋅ m2\text{A}\,\cdot\,\text{m}^2), B⃗\vec B is the uniform external field (tesla, T), and τ⃗\vec\tau is the resulting torque (N·m), directed to rotate the loop toward smaller θ\theta — toward aligning m⃗\vec m with B⃗\vec B. This is structurally identical to τ⃗=p⃗×E⃗\vec\tau = \vec p\times\vec E, the torque an electric dipole feels in a uniform field, with m⃗\vec m playing the role of p⃗\vec p; a current loop is, for external-field purposes, a magnetic dipole, exactly the next topic in this chapter.

Figure
A rectangular current loop tilted at an angle theta inside a uniform magnetic field, with equal and opposite forces on the two vertical sides separated by an arm that produces a net torque while the horizontal side forces are collinear and cancel
Rectangular loop in a uniform field — force pairs give torque, not net force B field loop, angle theta to B theta F up F down arm = a sin theta loop rotates toward theta = 0 Horizontal-side forces are equal, opposite and collinear — they cancel completely. Vertical-side forces are equal, opposite and offset by arm a sin theta — that offset couple is the torque.
Derivation ATorque on a rectangular current loop in a uniform magnetic field

The goal is to derive the scalar torque formula τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta from nothing more than the force law F⃗=Il⃗×B⃗\vec F = I\vec l\times\vec B, applied one side at a time to a rigid rectangular loop free to rotate about an axis through its centre, then to show the result matches the compact vector statement τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B with magnetic moment m=NIAm = NIA. No calculus is needed — only the geometry of a couple, two equal and opposite forces acting along different lines.

Step 1. Set up the loop. Take a single-turn rectangular loop with horizontal sides of length aa and vertical sides of length bb, carrying current II, free to rotate about the vertical axis through its centre. Let B⃗\vec B be uniform and lie in the horizontal plane, and let θ\theta be the angle between the loop's normal n^\hat n and B⃗\vec B. The loop encloses area A=abA = ab.

Step 2. Find the forces on the horizontal sides. Both make the same angle with B⃗\vec B, and because current flows in opposite directions along them (to complete the circuit), the two forces IaBIaB are equal and opposite. They also lie along the same vertical line of action through the centre — they merely try to stretch the loop along the rotation axis. Equal, opposite, collinear forces sum to zero net force and zero net torque, so this pair drops out entirely.

Step 3. Find the forces on the vertical sides. Each vertical side has length bb and carries current II; the component of B⃗\vec B perpendicular to the wire produces a force of magnitude F=IbBF = IbB on each (the component along the wire contributes nothing, by the vector product). Because current runs oppositely along the two vertical sides, the two forces are equal and opposite — net force from this pair is also zero.

Step 4. Locate the perpendicular arm between the two vertical-side forces. Unlike the horizontal pair, these forces do not share a line of action: as the loop tilts by θ\theta from the plane perpendicular to B⃗\vec B, the separation between the vertical sides, measured perpendicular to the force direction, works out to asin⁡θa\sin\theta. Two equal, opposite, non-collinear forces form a couple, and a couple's torque is one force's magnitude times the perpendicular distance between the two lines of action.

Step 5. Multiply force by arm. τ=F×(asin⁡θ)=(IbB)(asin⁡θ)=IABsin⁡θ\tau = F\times(a\sin\theta) = (IbB)(a\sin\theta) = IAB\sin\theta, using A=abA = ab. For a coil of NN turns, each turn independently contributes this same couple, so the torques simply add: τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta.

Step 6. Repackage as a vector cross product. Define m⃗=NIA⃗\vec m = NI\vec A, magnitude NIANIA along the normal n^\hat n. Since θ\theta is the angle between m⃗\vec m and B⃗\vec B, the scalar result is exactly the magnitude of m⃗×B⃗\vec m\times\vec B, and checking directions (the torque rotates m⃗\vec m toward B⃗\vec B, matching the right-hand sense) confirms τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B as an identity. This used only a rectangular loop, but τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B holds for a planar loop of any shape, since any planar current distribution can be built from infinitesimal rectangular elements.

Worked examples

Board level - rectangular coil at maximum-torque orientation

A rectangular coil of 100100 turns, each of area 0.02 m20.02\ \text{m}^2, carries a current of 2 A2\ \text{A} and is placed in a uniform magnetic field of 0.5 T0.5\ \text{T} such that the plane of the coil is parallel to the field. Find the torque on the coil, and state whether this is the largest or smallest torque the coil can experience in this field.

Step 1. Identify θ\theta. The plane of the coil is parallel to B⃗\vec B, so the normal n^\hat n is perpendicular to B⃗\vec B — a common point of confusion, since the formula's angle is always between the normal and the field, not the plane and the field. Here θ=90°\theta = 90°, so sin⁡θ=1\sin\theta = 1.

Step 2. Write the values. N=100N = 100, I=2 AI = 2\ \text{A}, A=0.02 m2A = 0.02\ \text{m}^2, B=0.5 TB = 0.5\ \text{T}, sin⁡θ=1\sin\theta = 1.

Step 3. Apply τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta in stages: N×I=100×2=200N\times I = 100\times 2 = 200; 200×A=200×0.02=4200\times A = 200\times 0.02 = 4; 4×B=4×0.5=24\times B = 4\times 0.5 = 2; 2×sin⁡θ=22\times\sin\theta = 2.

Step 4. State the result and its significance. τ=2 N ⋅ m\tau = 2\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m}. Since θ=90°\theta = 90° makes sin⁡θ\sin\theta take its largest value, this is the maximum torque this coil can experience while carrying 2 A2\ \text{A} in a 0.5 T0.5\ \text{T} field — every other orientation gives less, falling to zero when the plane turns perpendicular to B⃗\vec B. The torque on the coil is 2 N ⋅ m2\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m}, the maximum possible for these values of NN, II, AA, and BB.

Competitive level - circular coil at an oblique angle, plus the restoring-torque check

A circular coil of 5050 turns and radius 0.1 m0.1\ \text{m} carries a current of 3 A3\ \text{A} in a magnetic field of 0.4 T0.4\ \text{T}. The normal to the coil makes an angle of 60°60° with the field. (a) Find the torque on the coil. (b) If the coil is now released from this orientation and free to rotate, in which sense does it turn, and what is the torque when it has rotated to θ=30°\theta = 30° from the field?

Step 1. Find the enclosed area of the circular coil, since AA means the area of one turn regardless of shape: A=πR2=π(0.1)2=0.01π≈0.0314 m2A = \pi R^2 = \pi(0.1)^2 = 0.01\pi \approx 0.0314\ \text{m}^2.

Step 2. Apply τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta with θ=60°\theta = 60°, sin⁡60°≈0.866\sin 60° \approx 0.866: N×I=50×3=150N\times I = 50\times 3 = 150; 150×A=150×0.0314=4.71150\times A = 150\times 0.0314 = 4.71; 4.71×B=4.71×0.4=1.8844.71\times B = 4.71\times 0.4 = 1.884; 1.884×0.866≈1.6321.884\times 0.866 \approx 1.632.

Step 3. State part (a). τ≈1.63 N ⋅ m\tau \approx 1.63\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at θ=60°\theta = 60°.

Step 4. Reason about the sense of rotation for part (b). The torque τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B always acts to reduce the angle between m⃗\vec m and B⃗\vec B — a restoring torque toward the stable equilibrium θ=0°\theta = 0°, just as an electric or magnetic dipole always turns to align with its field. So released from θ=60°\theta = 60°, the coil rotates so θ\theta decreases.

Step 5. Recompute the torque at θ=30°\theta = 30°, reusing the fixed product 4.71×0.4=1.8844.71\times 0.4 = 1.884 from Step 2 (unchanged, since NN, II, AA, BB are fixed) and only replacing sin⁡θ\sin\theta: sin⁡30°=0.5\sin 30° = 0.5, so τ=1.884×0.5=0.942 N ⋅ m\tau = 1.884\times 0.5 = 0.942\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m}. Answers: (a) τ≈1.63 N ⋅ m\tau \approx 1.63\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at θ=60°\theta = 60°; (b) the coil rotates toward smaller θ\theta, and the torque falls to about 0.94 N ⋅ m0.94\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at θ=30°\theta = 30° — smaller because sin⁡θ\sin\theta is smaller, even though the coil is "closer" to aligning. Timing note: keep this under three minutes. Compute the fixed product NIABNIAB once — here 1.884 N ⋅ m1.884\ \text{N}\,\cdot\,\text{m} — and reuse it for every θ\theta the question asks about, multiplying only by the new sin⁡θ\sin\theta; do not recompute NN, II, AA, BB from scratch each sub-part. Keep the direction reasoning verbal: torque always pushes toward θ=0°\theta = 0°, so there is no need to redraw a force diagram just to answer "which way."

Common traps

Confusing the angle in the formula. The single most common error is treating θ\theta as the angle between the loop's plane and B⃗\vec B, when it is actually between the loop's normal and B⃗\vec B. If a question gives the plane angle, convert first: angle with normal equals 90°90° minus angle with plane. Assuming a net force exists. Many students, having just learned F⃗=Il⃗×B⃗\vec F = I\vec l\times\vec B for a straight wire, expect a loop to be pushed sideways by a uniform field. It is not — forces on opposite sides always cancel, leaving torque only. (A non-uniform field can produce a small net force, but that is outside this syllabus.) Forgetting the number of turns NN. A coil of 100100 turns produces 100100 times the torque of a single loop with the same current, field, and area; dropping NN is a routine one-mark loss. Treating maximum torque as the default. Some answers quietly assume sin⁡θ=1\sin\theta = 1 even when a different angle is given. Torque is zero at θ=0°\theta = 0° (stable equilibrium) and rises to a maximum only at θ=90°\theta = 90° — compute it for whatever θ\theta is actually stated. Mixing up stable and unstable equilibrium. θ=0°\theta = 0° (m⃗\vec m parallel to B⃗\vec B) is stable; a small displacement produces a restoring torque back to it. θ=180°\theta = 180° (m⃗\vec m antiparallel to B⃗\vec B) also gives zero torque but is unstable — the tiniest disturbance grows. Both give τ=0\tau = 0, but only one is a genuine resting configuration.

You should be able to…

  • State and apply τ⃗=m⃗×B⃗\vec\tau = \vec m\times\vec B (magnitude τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta) for a current loop of NN turns, current II, area AA, in a uniform field BB.
  • Derive the torque on a rectangular current loop from the forces on its four sides, identifying which pair cancels completely and which pair forms the couple.
  • Explain, in words, why the net force on any current loop in a uniform field is always zero even when the net torque is not.
  • Identify the orientation of maximum torque (θ=90°\theta = 90°), zero torque at stable equilibrium (θ=0°\theta = 0°), and zero torque at unstable equilibrium (θ=180°\theta = 180°).
  • Compute torque for loops of different shapes (rectangular, circular) given NN, II, AA, BB and θ\theta, and recompute it efficiently when only θ\theta changes.
  • Connect this torque expression to the current loop's identity as a magnetic dipole (m=NIAm = NIA) and to the radial-field design of a moving-coil galvanometer.

Ask the tutor: Want to see how this same torque formula, kept constant by a radial field, turns into the linear current scale of a moving-coil galvanometer — ask the AI tutor to walk through that next step.

Why does the loop feel a torque but not a push, when a single wire in the same field clearly gets pushed?

Every side of the loop is, individually, a straight current-carrying wire and does feel a force F⃗=Il⃗×B⃗\vec F = I\vec l\times\vec B exactly like any wire would. The difference is that a loop is a closed circuit, so opposite sides carry current in opposite senses. Their forces are equal and opposite, so they cancel as vectors — no leftover push. But the vertical-side forces are not collinear, only equal and opposite, and a pair like that is a couple: zero net force, yet a real net torque, because it can rotate the loop even though it cannot slide it.

Is the torque formula tau equals NIAB sin theta only for rectangular loops, or does it work for a circular coil too?

It works for any planar loop shape — rectangular, circular, triangular — as long as AA is the actual enclosed area of one turn. The force-pair derivation here uses a rectangle because its straight sides make the force calculation easy to follow, but any planar loop can be built from many tiny rectangular current elements, each obeying the same rule, so their torques add up to the identical result τ=NIABsin⁡θ\tau = NIAB\sin\theta. That is why the circular-coil worked example uses the same formula with A=πR2A = \pi R^2 substituted in.

How is this connected to the moving-coil galvanometer that comes right after this topic?

A galvanometer is this exact torque put to work: a small many-turn coil sits in a magnetic field and carries the current to be measured, and the resulting torque twists the coil against a restoring spring until the two torques balance, so the steady deflection angle reports the current. The one extra trick a real galvanometer adds is a magnet shaped to give a radial field, keeping the coil's plane always parallel to B⃗\vec B (effectively θ=90°\theta = 90° throughout) so deflection is directly proportional to current, not an inconvenient sin⁡θ\sin\theta curve.

Before this

Where this leads