Torque on a current loop
Take a small rectangular coil of wire, connect it to a battery so a current flows round it, and lower it edge-first into the field of a horseshoe magnet. Nothing pushes it sideways. Instead it twists — the coil rotates about an axis through its centre, like a tiny door on hinges, until its plane settles perpendicular to the field and the twisting stops. Every electric motor on the planet, from a toy car to a metro train, is built on this one observation: a current loop in a magnetic field feels a torque, not a net force. This is the payoff idea of "Moving Charges and Magnetism." Earlier sections built the tools one at a time — the force on a moving charge, then on a current-carrying wire, then the force between two parallel wires. A current loop is nothing but four such wires joined into a closed rectangle, so this topic is an exercise in adding up four force vectors correctly and discovering that they cancel in one respect (net force is zero) while reinforcing in another (net torque survives). The result is a compact formula, , that a board answer must state, derive, and apply numerically. Beyond the exam, this is the bridge to two ideas immediately ahead: the current loop as a magnetic dipole with moment , and the moving-coil galvanometer, which turns this very torque into a needle deflection. Get this derivation solid and both become one small extra step, not two new topics.
- A current-carrying loop placed in a uniform magnetic field experiences a net torque but zero net force — the field twists the loop without dragging it sideways.
- For a planar loop of turns, each of area , carrying current , in a uniform field , the torque magnitude is , where is the angle between the loop's normal (area vector) and .
- In vector form this is , where is the loop's magnetic moment — the same relation an electric dipole obeys with .
- Torque is maximum () when the loop's plane is parallel to (normal perpendicular to , ), and zero when the loop's plane is perpendicular to (normal aligned with , , the stable equilibrium).
- The formula comes from a genuine force-by-force analysis of the four sides of a rectangular loop: two sides feel forces along the same line (no torque, no rotation), the other two feel an equal-and-opposite pair separated by an arm of length , and that pair is the whole torque.
- This exact torque, kept effectively constant over the full swing by a clever radial-field magnet design, is what makes the pointer of a moving-coil galvanometer deflect in proportion to the current passing through it.
- Key idea: a uniform magnetic field exerts zero net force but a net torque on a current loop of magnetic moment , and this torque is the working principle shared by electric motors and the moving-coil galvanometer.
A current loop of magnetic moment placed in a uniform field feels zero net force but a net torque , of magnitude , that is maximum when the loop's plane lies along the field and zero when it lies across it.
Where it fits in the syllabus
This sits at the close of the CBSE Class 12 unit Moving Charges and Magnetism, directly after the force on a current-carrying conductor and the force between two parallel wires — both of which this derivation reuses. The board syllabus explicitly lists "torque experienced by a current loop in uniform magnetic field" with the relation , so both the formula and a working derivation for a rectangular loop are fair game in a five-mark question. It is deliberately positioned right before the current loop is reintroduced as a magnetic dipole and before the moving-coil galvanometer, so mastering the force-pair argument here pays off twice more within the same chapter.
The physical picture
Picture a rectangular loop of wire, sides of length (horizontal) and (vertical), carrying a steady current , free to rotate about a vertical axis through its centre. A uniform magnetic field points horizontally, in the plane containing the rotation axis. Let be the angle between the loop's normal — given by curling the right-hand fingers along the current and pointing the thumb — and ; equivalently, is also the angle between the field and the plane of the two vertical sides. Each straight side carries current in a magnetic field, so each feels a force . The two horizontal sides (length ) make the same angle with but carry current in opposite senses, so their forces are equal, opposite, and — crucially — collinear, acting along the same vertical line through the centre. Equal, opposite, collinear forces give zero net force and zero net torque from this pair; they merely try to stretch or compress the loop. The two vertical sides (length ) are the ones that matter. Each feels a force of magnitude , directed horizontally, and because the currents in them run opposite ways, the two forces are equal and opposite too — so once again the net force is zero. But they do not act along the same line: they are separated, perpendicular to the force direction, by an arm of length . An equal-and-opposite pair separated by a perpendicular arm is a couple, and a couple exerts a torque even with zero net force.
where: is the magnitude of each of the two equal-and-opposite forces on the vertical sides, is the perpendicular distance between their lines of action, and is the area enclosed by the loop. For a coil of identical turns instead of a single loop, every turn contributes this same torque, so the total is times as large:
This scalar result is the magnitude of a vector relation. Define the loop's magnetic moment , a vector of magnitude pointing along the normal (right-hand rule on the current direction). Then the torque on the loop in a uniform field is
where: is the magnetic moment (unit ), is the uniform external field (tesla, T), and is the resulting torque (N·m), directed to rotate the loop toward smaller — toward aligning with . This is structurally identical to , the torque an electric dipole feels in a uniform field, with playing the role of ; a current loop is, for external-field purposes, a magnetic dipole, exactly the next topic in this chapter.
The goal is to derive the scalar torque formula from nothing more than the force law , applied one side at a time to a rigid rectangular loop free to rotate about an axis through its centre, then to show the result matches the compact vector statement with magnetic moment . No calculus is needed — only the geometry of a couple, two equal and opposite forces acting along different lines.
Step 1. Set up the loop. Take a single-turn rectangular loop with horizontal sides of length and vertical sides of length , carrying current , free to rotate about the vertical axis through its centre. Let be uniform and lie in the horizontal plane, and let be the angle between the loop's normal and . The loop encloses area .
Step 2. Find the forces on the horizontal sides. Both make the same angle with , and because current flows in opposite directions along them (to complete the circuit), the two forces are equal and opposite. They also lie along the same vertical line of action through the centre — they merely try to stretch the loop along the rotation axis. Equal, opposite, collinear forces sum to zero net force and zero net torque, so this pair drops out entirely.
Step 3. Find the forces on the vertical sides. Each vertical side has length and carries current ; the component of perpendicular to the wire produces a force of magnitude on each (the component along the wire contributes nothing, by the vector product). Because current runs oppositely along the two vertical sides, the two forces are equal and opposite — net force from this pair is also zero.
Step 4. Locate the perpendicular arm between the two vertical-side forces. Unlike the horizontal pair, these forces do not share a line of action: as the loop tilts by from the plane perpendicular to , the separation between the vertical sides, measured perpendicular to the force direction, works out to . Two equal, opposite, non-collinear forces form a couple, and a couple's torque is one force's magnitude times the perpendicular distance between the two lines of action.
Step 5. Multiply force by arm. , using . For a coil of turns, each turn independently contributes this same couple, so the torques simply add: .
Step 6. Repackage as a vector cross product. Define , magnitude along the normal . Since is the angle between and , the scalar result is exactly the magnitude of , and checking directions (the torque rotates toward , matching the right-hand sense) confirms as an identity. This used only a rectangular loop, but holds for a planar loop of any shape, since any planar current distribution can be built from infinitesimal rectangular elements.
Worked examples
Board level - rectangular coil at maximum-torque orientation
A rectangular coil of turns, each of area , carries a current of and is placed in a uniform magnetic field of such that the plane of the coil is parallel to the field. Find the torque on the coil, and state whether this is the largest or smallest torque the coil can experience in this field.
Step 1. Identify . The plane of the coil is parallel to , so the normal is perpendicular to — a common point of confusion, since the formula's angle is always between the normal and the field, not the plane and the field. Here , so .
Step 2. Write the values. , , , , .
Step 3. Apply in stages: ; ; ; .
Step 4. State the result and its significance. . Since makes take its largest value, this is the maximum torque this coil can experience while carrying in a field — every other orientation gives less, falling to zero when the plane turns perpendicular to . The torque on the coil is , the maximum possible for these values of , , , and .
Competitive level - circular coil at an oblique angle, plus the restoring-torque check
A circular coil of turns and radius carries a current of in a magnetic field of . The normal to the coil makes an angle of with the field. (a) Find the torque on the coil. (b) If the coil is now released from this orientation and free to rotate, in which sense does it turn, and what is the torque when it has rotated to from the field?
Step 1. Find the enclosed area of the circular coil, since means the area of one turn regardless of shape: .
Step 2. Apply with , : ; ; ; .
Step 3. State part (a). at .
Step 4. Reason about the sense of rotation for part (b). The torque always acts to reduce the angle between and — a restoring torque toward the stable equilibrium , just as an electric or magnetic dipole always turns to align with its field. So released from , the coil rotates so decreases.
Step 5. Recompute the torque at , reusing the fixed product from Step 2 (unchanged, since , , , are fixed) and only replacing : , so . Answers: (a) at ; (b) the coil rotates toward smaller , and the torque falls to about at — smaller because is smaller, even though the coil is "closer" to aligning. Timing note: keep this under three minutes. Compute the fixed product once — here — and reuse it for every the question asks about, multiplying only by the new ; do not recompute , , , from scratch each sub-part. Keep the direction reasoning verbal: torque always pushes toward , so there is no need to redraw a force diagram just to answer "which way."
Common traps
Confusing the angle in the formula. The single most common error is treating as the angle between the loop's plane and , when it is actually between the loop's normal and . If a question gives the plane angle, convert first: angle with normal equals minus angle with plane. Assuming a net force exists. Many students, having just learned for a straight wire, expect a loop to be pushed sideways by a uniform field. It is not — forces on opposite sides always cancel, leaving torque only. (A non-uniform field can produce a small net force, but that is outside this syllabus.) Forgetting the number of turns . A coil of turns produces times the torque of a single loop with the same current, field, and area; dropping is a routine one-mark loss. Treating maximum torque as the default. Some answers quietly assume even when a different angle is given. Torque is zero at (stable equilibrium) and rises to a maximum only at — compute it for whatever is actually stated. Mixing up stable and unstable equilibrium. ( parallel to ) is stable; a small displacement produces a restoring torque back to it. ( antiparallel to ) also gives zero torque but is unstable — the tiniest disturbance grows. Both give , but only one is a genuine resting configuration.
You should be able to…
- State and apply (magnitude ) for a current loop of turns, current , area , in a uniform field .
- Derive the torque on a rectangular current loop from the forces on its four sides, identifying which pair cancels completely and which pair forms the couple.
- Explain, in words, why the net force on any current loop in a uniform field is always zero even when the net torque is not.
- Identify the orientation of maximum torque (), zero torque at stable equilibrium (), and zero torque at unstable equilibrium ().
- Compute torque for loops of different shapes (rectangular, circular) given , , , and , and recompute it efficiently when only changes.
- Connect this torque expression to the current loop's identity as a magnetic dipole () and to the radial-field design of a moving-coil galvanometer.
Ask the tutor: Want to see how this same torque formula, kept constant by a radial field, turns into the linear current scale of a moving-coil galvanometer — ask the AI tutor to walk through that next step.
Why does the loop feel a torque but not a push, when a single wire in the same field clearly gets pushed?
Every side of the loop is, individually, a straight current-carrying wire and does feel a force exactly like any wire would. The difference is that a loop is a closed circuit, so opposite sides carry current in opposite senses. Their forces are equal and opposite, so they cancel as vectors — no leftover push. But the vertical-side forces are not collinear, only equal and opposite, and a pair like that is a couple: zero net force, yet a real net torque, because it can rotate the loop even though it cannot slide it.
Is the torque formula tau equals NIAB sin theta only for rectangular loops, or does it work for a circular coil too?
It works for any planar loop shape — rectangular, circular, triangular — as long as is the actual enclosed area of one turn. The force-pair derivation here uses a rectangle because its straight sides make the force calculation easy to follow, but any planar loop can be built from many tiny rectangular current elements, each obeying the same rule, so their torques add up to the identical result . That is why the circular-coil worked example uses the same formula with substituted in.
How is this connected to the moving-coil galvanometer that comes right after this topic?
A galvanometer is this exact torque put to work: a small many-turn coil sits in a magnetic field and carries the current to be measured, and the resulting torque twists the coil against a restoring spring until the two torques balance, so the steady deflection angle reports the current. The one extra trick a real galvanometer adds is a magnet shaped to give a radial field, keeping the coil's plane always parallel to (effectively throughout) so deflection is directly proportional to current, not an inconvenient curve.