Place-value proofs with digits

Ask a friend to pick any two-digit number, reverse its digits, and subtract the smaller from the larger — the answer is always a multiple of 9. Ask them to add the number to its reverse instead, and the total is always a multiple of 11. These are not lucky coincidences you have to memorise as separate facts; they fall out of one simple idea, that a two-digit number with tens digit tt and units digit uu is really 10t+u10t+u, not the two digits jammed side by side. Writing the reversed number the same way and combining the two expressions with the distributive law turns a magic trick into a two-line algebraic proof. This section builds that place-value expansion, proves both digit tricks properly, and then uses the same equations to solve for unknown digits when only a sum or difference is given.

The core insight

Writing a two-digit number as 10t+u10t+u (not as digits side by side) turns digit-reversal tricks into algebra: subtracting the reverse gives 9(t−u)9(t-u), always a multiple of 9, and adding the reverse gives 11(t+u)11(t+u), always a multiple of 11.

The core idea

A two-digit number is not "tutu" written together — each digit's contribution depends on where it sits. The tens digit is worth ten times its face value, so with tens digit tt and units digit uu:

Number=10t+u\text{Number} = 10t + u

where: tt is the tens digit (a whole number from 1 to 9, since a genuine two-digit number cannot start with 0), and uu is the units digit (0 to 9). Reversing the digits does not change what the digits are, only where they sit — the old units digit now occupies the tens place, and vice versa:

Reversed number=10u+t\text{Reversed number} = 10u + t

Every digit-reversal trick follows from combining these two expressions.

Subtract the reverse from the original:

(10t+u)−(10u+t)=9t−9u=9(t−u)(10t+u) - (10u+t) = 9t - 9u = 9(t-u)

The right-hand side is 99 multiplied by the whole number t−ut-u, so the difference is always a multiple of 99 — whatever digits you started with (as long as t≠ut \ne u, so the answer is not zero).

Add the reverse to the original:

(10t+u)+(10u+t)=11t+11u=11(t+u)(10t+u) + (10u+t) = 11t + 11u = 11(t+u)

Here the 10t10t and tt combine to 11t11t, and 10u10u and uu combine to 11u11u, so the sum is always a multiple of 1111. The same expansion scales up: a three-digit number with hundreds digit hh, tens digit tt, units digit uu is 100h+10t+u100h+10t+u, used for more advanced digit-swap proofs beyond this section's scope. Notice that both results share the same skeleton: expand, combine, then pull out a common factor with the distributive law. Nothing about the specific digits tt or uu matters to why the result is a multiple of 9 or 11 — only the place-value gap between the tens and units positions (a factor of 10) does. This is why the trick works for absolutely any two-digit number, not just the ones you happen to try.

Figure
Two stacked place value bars showing a two digit number as ten times the tens digit plus the units digit and its reverse as ten times the units digit plus the tens digit
Place value: digits are not just written side by side Original number tens digit t × 10 units u = 10t + u Reversed number units digit u × 10 tens t = 10u + t
Derivation AReverse and subtract always gives a multiple of 9

The goal is to show, using nothing beyond the place-value expansion and the distributive law, that for any two-digit number, subtracting the number formed by reversing its digits from the original always produces a result divisible by 9, and that the size of that multiple of 9 is fixed by how far apart the two digits are.

Step 1. Write both numbers in place-value form. Let the original number have tens digit tt and units digit uu, so the original is 10t+u10t+u and the reversed number is 10u+t10u+t.

Step 2. Subtract the reversed number from the original: (10t+u)−(10u+t)(10t+u)-(10u+t). Remove the brackets carefully, remembering the second bracket is subtracted as a whole: 10t+u−10u−t10t+u-10u-t.

Step 3. Collect the tt terms and the uu terms separately: (10t−t)+(u−10u)=9t−9u(10t-t) + (u-10u) = 9t - 9u.

Step 4. Factor out the common 99 using the distributive law in reverse: 9t−9u=9(t−u)9t-9u = 9(t-u). Since t−ut-u is always a whole number (the difference of two single digits), 9(t−u)9(t-u) is always 99 times a whole number, which is exactly what it means to be a multiple of 99. ■\blacksquare Check with a number: take t=8,u=3t=8, u=3, so the number is 8383 and its reverse is 3838. Then 83−38=4583-38=45, and indeed 9(8−3)=9×5=459(8-3)=9\times5=45.

Worked example

Problem. A two-digit number has digits differing by 4. When the number is reversed and the reverse is subtracted from the original, the result is 36. Find all two-digit numbers that satisfy this, then check which one also has a digit sum of 12.

Step 1. Set up the number and its reverse. Let the tens digit be tt and the units digit be uu, so the number is 10t+u10t+u and the reverse is 10u+t10u+t.

Step 2. Use the subtraction proof. From the core idea, (10t+u)−(10u+t)=9(t−u)(10t+u)-(10u+t) = 9(t-u). We are told this equals 3636:

9(t−u)=369(t-u) = 36

Step 3. Solve for the digit difference. Dividing both sides by 9:

t−u=4t-u = 4

This matches the given condition, so it is consistent — but a single equation in two unknowns does not pin down tt and uu individually; it only fixes their difference.

Step 4. List the possibilities. Since tt must be 1 to 9 and uu must be 0 to 9 with t=u+4t=u+4, the valid pairs are (t,u)=(5,1),(6,2),(7,3),(8,4),(9,5)(t,u) = (5,1), (6,2), (7,3), (8,4), (9,5), giving numbers 51,62,73,84,9551, 62, 73, 84, 95.

Step 5. Apply the extra clue — digit sum 12 — to pick one. Check each: 5+1=65+1=6, 6+2=86+2=8, 7+3=107+3=10, 8+4=128+4=12 ✓, 9+5=149+5=14. Only t=8,u=4t=8, u=4 works.

Verify: number =84=84, reverse =48=48; 84−48=3684-48=36 ✓ and 8+4=128+4=12 ✓. The number is 84.

Competitive stretch

If instead you were told the sum with the reverse is 132132 and asked to find the digit sum directly, use (10t+u)+(10u+t)=11(t+u)=132(10t+u)+(10u+t)=11(t+u)=132, so t+u=12t+u=12 — the same digit sum as above, reached from the addition trick instead of the subtraction one, confirming both proofs describe the same number 8484 (since 84+48=13284+48=132).

Common traps

  • Writing a two-digit number as the digits placed side by side (like "tutu" meaning multiplication) instead of the place-value form 10t+u10t+u — this single mistake breaks every proof that follows.
  • Forgetting that tt cannot be 0 for a genuine two-digit number, and that both tt and uu must be whole numbers from 0 to 9 — a computed value like u=4.5u=4.5 or t=11t=11 means the given conditions are impossible, not a valid final digit.
  • Mixing up which operation goes with which factor: subtracting the reverse gives a multiple of 9, adding the reverse gives a multiple of 11 — both come from the same 10t+u10t+u setup but combine differently.
  • Treating a sum or difference equation (like t+u=12t+u=12) as enough to find a unique number — it only fixes a relationship between the digits, so an extra clue is usually needed, as in the worked example.

Ask the tutor: Got a digit-reversal riddle with a sum or difference clue and want help turning it into the right place-value equation? Ask the AI tutor to walk through it with you step by step.

Why is it wrong to write a two-digit number as just its digits next to each other, like "tu"?

Writing "tutu" looks like multiplication and hides the fact that the tens digit's value depends on its position. A digit tt sitting in the tens place is worth 10t10t, ten times its face value — that is the entire point of place value. If you wrote the number as t×ut \times u instead of 10t+u10t+u, every proof about reversing digits and getting a multiple of 9 or 11 would break, because the algebra only works when position is captured correctly.

Why does subtracting give a multiple of 9 but adding give a multiple of 11 — what causes the difference?

Both come from combining 10t+u10t+u and 10u+t10u+t, but the two operations combine the tt and uu terms differently. Subtracting lines up 10t−t=9t10t-t=9t and u−10u=−9uu-10u=-9u, so a factor of 9 appears on both terms. Adding lines up 10t+t=11t10t+t=11t and u+10u=11uu+10u=11u, so a factor of 11 appears instead. The 9 comes from "ten minus one," and the 11 comes from "ten plus one" — the same place-value gap of 10 versus 1, just combined with a different sign.

If I get a decimal or a digit bigger than 9 when solving for t or u, did I make an arithmetic mistake?

Not necessarily — it may mean the conditions given in the problem cannot all be true together for a real two-digit number. Digits must be whole numbers from 0 to 9 (and the tens digit cannot be 0). If your algebra correctly gives, say, u=4.5u=4.5 or t=11t=11, the right response is to say the given clues are inconsistent, not to round the answer or search for an arithmetic slip. Double-check your equation setup first, but a "bad" digit can be a valid conclusion.

Before this

Where this leads