Ratio and proportion

A school stationery box holds pens and pencils in the ratio 5:85:8. A shopkeeper splits a day's profit of ₹4,400 among three partners in the ratio 3:4:43:4:4. A recipe scaled up for a bigger party, a map scaled down to fit a page, a mixture of paint diluted to a lighter shade — every one of these is the same idea wearing a different costume: comparing two quantities of the same kind by division, and recognising when two such comparisons say the same thing. Ratio gives the comparison a precise symbol, a:ba:b, and proportion gives us the rule for when a:ba:b equals c:dc:d. Once that rule is fixed, sharing a bill fairly, scaling a drawing, or checking whether a recipe has been mixed correctly all reduce to the same short calculation, worked the same way every time.

The core insight

A ratio a:ba:b is the fraction ab\dfrac{a}{b} comparing two like quantities, and a proportion a:b::c:da:b::c:d states that two ratios are equal, which cross-multiplication (ad=bcad = bc) lets us test or solve instantly.

The core idea

Ratio: comparing like with like. The ratio of aa to bb (with b≠0b \neq 0) is written

a:b=aba : b = \dfrac{a}{b}

where: aa and bb must be quantities of the same kind and the same unit — comparing kilograms to kilograms, not kilograms to litres. A ratio carries no unit of its own, since the units cancel: 6 kg:2 kg=3:16\ \text{kg} : 2\ \text{kg} = 3:1. Like a fraction, a ratio is reduced to its simplest form by dividing both terms by their HCF, and multiplying or dividing both terms by the same non-zero number never changes its value — 2:32:3, 4:64:6, and 10:1510:15 are all equivalent ratios.

Proportion: two ratios agreeing. When a:ba:b and c:dc:d are equal, the four numbers form a proportion, written

a:b::c:di.e.ab=cda : b :: c : d \quad \text{i.e.} \quad \dfrac{a}{b} = \dfrac{c}{d}

where: aa and dd are the extremes (the outer terms) and bb and cc are the means (the inner terms). To compare two ratios that are not obviously equal, convert both to fractions with a common denominator or to decimals and compare directly.

Comparing ratios and equivalent ratios. To decide which of two ratios, say 3:53:5 and 4:74:7, is larger, rewrite both as fractions with a common denominator (35=2135\dfrac{3}{5}=\dfrac{21}{35} and 47=2035\dfrac{4}{7}=\dfrac{20}{35}) or convert both to decimals (0.60.6 and 0.571…0.571\ldots) and compare the results directly — here 3:53:5 is the larger ratio. This works because a ratio behaves exactly like a fraction under every operation: multiplying or dividing both terms of a:ba:b by the same non-zero number produces an equivalent ratio with the same value, just as 23\dfrac{2}{3} and 46\dfrac{4}{6} are equivalent fractions. Every ratio therefore has infinitely many equivalent forms, and only the one obtained by dividing through by the HCF is called its simplest form.

Dividing a quantity in a given ratio. To split a total QQ in the ratio a:b:ca:b:c, treat the ratio as (a+b+c)(a+b+c) equal parts. One part is worth Qa+b+c\dfrac{Q}{a+b+c}, so the three shares are

aa+b+c Q,ba+b+c Q,ca+b+c Q\dfrac{a}{a+b+c}\,Q, \quad \dfrac{b}{a+b+c}\,Q, \quad \dfrac{c}{a+b+c}\,Q

This "value of one part" method is the standard tool for every share-in-a-ratio question, whether it involves two parties or five.

Figure
A bar of length four hundred forty units split into three segments of ninety, one hundred twenty and one hundred twenty units, labelled part sizes for a three by four by four ratio, showing equal small units grouped into unequal shares
Dividing a quantity in the ratio 3 : 4 : 4 eleven equal parts, each worth one eleventh of the total 3 parts 4 parts 4 parts Riya Aman Zoya 11 parts represent the whole amount, one part = total divided by 11
Derivation ACross-multiplication rule for a proportion

The goal is to show, starting only from the definition of a proportion as two equal fractions, why the shortcut "product of extremes equals product of means" always holds, so that any single unknown term in a:b::c:da:b::c:d can be found by one multiplication and one division instead of manipulating fractions from scratch.

Step 1. Write the proportion as the fraction statement it actually is. If a:b::c:da:b::c:d, then by definition ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b} = \dfrac{c}{d}.

Step 2. Clear both denominators by multiplying both sides by bdbd, which is allowed since b≠0b \neq 0 and d≠0d \neq 0. The left side becomes ab×bd=ad\dfrac{a}{b}\times bd = ad, and the right side becomes cd×bd=bc\dfrac{c}{d}\times bd = bc.

Step 3. Read off the result: ad=bcad = bc, that is, extremes-product equals means-product. This is exactly the cross-multiplication rule, and it runs both ways — if ad=bcad = bc for four non-zero numbers, then a:b::c:da:b::c:d is a genuine proportion.

Step 4. Use it to solve for an unknown. If three of the four terms are known and the fourth is xx, isolate xx by dividing: for instance in ab=cx\dfrac{a}{b} = \dfrac{c}{x}, cross-multiplying gives ax=bcax = bc, so x=bcax = \dfrac{bc}{a}. This single move is what powers every "find the missing term" ratio problem.

Worked example

A school stationery box contains pens and pencils in the ratio 5:85:8. There are 6565 pens. How many pencils are there, and what is the total number of items?

Step 1. Let the number of pencils be xx. Since pens : pencils stays fixed at 5:85:8, set up the proportion 58=65x\dfrac{5}{8} = \dfrac{65}{x}.

Step 2. Cross-multiply using the rule just derived: 5x=8×65=5205x = 8 \times 65 = 520.

Step 3. Solve for xx: x=5205=104x = \dfrac{520}{5} = 104. So there are 104 pencils, and the total number of items is 65+104=16965 + 104 = 169.

Step 4. Check by reducing the answer back to a ratio: 65:10465:104 divides by their HCF, 1313, giving 5:85:8 — exactly the ratio we started with.

Competitive stretch

Suppose the same box is restocked so the total items become 220220, keeping the pens-to-pencils ratio at 5:85:8. Total parts =5+8=13= 5+8 = 13, so one part =220/13≈16.9= 220/13 \approx 16.9 — not a whole number, which immediately signals that 220220 is not a valid total for this ratio (a valid total must be a multiple of 1313, such as 169169 or 260260). Spotting this "must divide evenly" check is a fast way to catch an inconsistent problem statement before solving further, and it also explains why ratio questions in exams are almost always built around totals chosen to divide exactly — the setter has done the same divisibility check in reverse while writing the question. The same idea extends naturally to sharing money: an amount of ₹4,400 split among three partners in the ratio 3:4:43:4:4 uses 3+4+4=113+4+4=11 parts, so one part is 4400/11=4004400/11 = 400, giving shares of 3×400=₹12003\times400=₹1200, 4×400=₹16004\times400=₹1600, and 4×400=₹16004\times400=₹1600. The check is identical in spirit — the shares add back to ₹4400₹4400, and 1200:1600:16001200:1600:1600 reduces (divide by 400400) back to 3:4:43:4:4. Notice both problems, despite looking different, use the very same "value of one part" logic.

Common traps

  • Forgetting to simplify. A ratio like 20:3020:30 should always be reduced to 2:32:3 before comparing it or stating it as a final answer.
  • Mixing units. A ratio must compare the same unit throughout — convert 22 km and 500500 m to the same unit first: 2000 m:500 m=4:12000\ \text{m} : 500\ \text{m} = 4:1, not 2:5002:500.
  • Treating "divide in a ratio" as "divide equally, then adjust." The reliable method is always: total parts, value of one part, then multiply — never guesswork.
  • Assuming a ratio fixes the actual quantities, or reversing its order. 5:85:8 could mean 55 and 88, or 5050 and 8080, or any equivalent pair — one extra fact (a total, or one real value) is needed to pin down the exact numbers. Also, a:ba:b is not the same as b:ab:a: "boys to girls =3:5=3:5" is a different classroom from "girls to boys =3:5=3:5".

Ask the tutor: Want more practice turning word problems into a proportion, or a walkthrough of dividing an amount among four or five people in a stated ratio?

Why does a ratio have no units even when the quantities being compared do?

A ratio is really a fraction, and when you form ab\dfrac{a}{b} with aa and bb measured in the same unit, that unit cancels out top and bottom, exactly the way it does in an ordinary fraction like 6 kg2 kg=3\dfrac{6\ \text{kg}}{2\ \text{kg}} = 3. What survives is a pure number describing how many times bigger one quantity is than the other. That is also why you must convert to the same unit before writing a ratio — if the units do not match, they cannot cancel, and the resulting "ratio" would be meaningless.

What is the difference between a ratio and a proportion?

A ratio, like 5:85:8, is a single comparison between two quantities. A proportion is a statement that two ratios are equal, like 5:8::65:1045:8 :: 65:104. So a ratio is one comparison, and a proportion is two comparisons declared to match. You use ratios to describe a relationship, and proportions to solve for an unknown quantity once you know that relationship holds in a second situation too.

If I am dividing a quantity in a given ratio, how do I know I have not made an arithmetic slip?

Always run the check the worked example uses: add the shares back together and confirm they equal the original total, then reduce the shares to their simplest ratio and confirm it matches the ratio you were given. If either check fails, an arithmetic slip happened somewhere in finding the value of one part or in the multiplication that followed, and it is worth redoing that step rather than the whole problem.

Before this

Where this leads