Perpendicular from centre to a chord
Drop a perpendicular from the centre of a circle onto any chord, and something neat always happens: it lands exactly on the midpoint of the chord, every single time, for every chord you could draw. This bisection property — and its converse, that the line joining the centre to a chord's midpoint is itself perpendicular to the chord — is one of the most useful facts in Class 9 circle geometry. It turns a two-dimensional chord problem into a one-dimensional right-triangle problem: once you have a right angle at the foot of the perpendicular, Pythagoras' theorem connects the radius, the perpendicular distance from the centre, and half the chord length in a single equation. This article states both directions of the result, builds the right-triangle formula properly, and works through the standard chord-and-radius numeric problems you will see in exams.
The perpendicular from the centre of a circle to a chord always bisects the chord, and conversely, the line from the centre to a chord's midpoint is always perpendicular to it — so radius, perpendicular distance, and half-chord always satisfy .
The core idea
This result follows directly after the "equal chords subtend equal angles at the centre" theorem in the NCERT Class 9 Circles chapter, and it is the workhorse for almost every numeric chord problem that follows it.
Result 1 (perpendicular implies bisection). Let be the centre of a circle and a chord. If with on , then — the perpendicular from the centre bisects the chord.
Result 2 (converse — bisection implies perpendicular). If is the midpoint of chord , then — the line joining the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to that chord. Both directions are prescribed as "state without proof" in the Class 9 syllabus, though the reasoning is short: draw radii and . In right triangles and , (both radii), is common to both triangles, and the angles at are right angles, so by the RHS congruence rule , which forces . The converse follows the same congruence the other way round, using SSS instead of RHS. Because is a right angle, is a right triangle with hypotenuse (the radius), so Pythagoras' theorem gives the working relation used throughout this topic:
where: is the radius of the circle, is the perpendicular distance from the centre to the chord, and is the length of the chord (so is the half-chord, ). Given any two of , , and , this single equation solves for the third — that is the entire toolkit for this section.
Perpendicular from centre bisects the chord
The goal is to show, from the two directions of the theorem stated above, that a right triangle formed by the radius, the perpendicular distance from the centre, and half a chord always satisfies , so that any exam question giving two of these three quantities can be solved for the third.
Step 1. Set up the triangle. Let be the centre of a circle of radius , let be a chord, and let be the foot of the perpendicular from onto , so and .
Step 2. Apply Result 1. Since is the perpendicular from the centre to the chord, is the midpoint of , so . This converts "half of an unfamiliar chord" into a labelled side of a triangle you can compute with.
Step 3. Identify the right triangle. In , the angle at is by construction, so (a radius, length ) is the hypotenuse, while and are the two legs.
Step 4. Apply Pythagoras' theorem to : , which is exactly . Any one of , , or can now be found from the other two by simple substitution and a square root.
Worked example
Problem. A chord of a circle of radius is at a distance of from the centre. Find the length of the chord.
Step 1. Set up the triangle. Let be the centre, the chord, and the foot of the perpendicular from to , so and .
Step 2. Since the perpendicular from the centre bisects the chord, , and is right-angled at .
Step 3. Apply Pythagoras: , so , giving , so and .
Step 4. Since bisects , .
Competitive stretch
Two parallel chords, and , lie on opposite sides of the centre of a circle with radius . Find the distance between them. Applying the same relation to each chord separately: for , half-chord , so ; for , half-chord , so . Since and lie on opposite sides of , the distance between them is . (Had they been on the same side, the distance would instead be .) One perpendicular-from-centre idea, applied twice, unlocks two-chord problems.
Common traps
- Using the full chord length instead of the half-chord in Pythagoras. The right triangle's leg is half the chord, not the whole chord — forgetting to halve is the single most common slip.
- Assuming any line from the centre to a chord bisects it. Only the perpendicular from the centre is guaranteed to pass through the midpoint; a line at any other angle generally misses it.
- Mixing up the hypotenuse. In , the radius is always the hypotenuse, opposite the right angle at — do not substitute or in its place.
- Treating a diameter as an exception. If the chord is a diameter, the perpendicular distance from the centre is simply , since the centre lies on the diameter itself — this is a valid, trivial case of the same formula, not a separate rule.
Ask the tutor: want to see this combined with the "equal chords are equidistant from the centre" theorem in a mixed problem — ask the AI tutor to walk you through it.
Why does the perpendicular from the centre always land exactly on the midpoint?
Because the two triangles it creates are forced to be congruent. Draw radii and to the two ends of the chord; these are equal since both are radii of the same circle. The perpendicular is shared by both triangles and , and the angles at are both right angles. By the RHS congruence rule, , which forces the remaining sides and to be equal — so must be the midpoint. It is not a coincidence of a particular chord; it holds for every chord in every circle.
Do I need to prove this result in an exam, or can I just use it?
In the Class 9 CBSE syllabus, both the theorem (perpendicular implies bisection) and its converse (bisection implies perpendicular) are listed as results to be used, not proved from scratch, unless a question explicitly asks for the proof. In practice this means you can quote "the perpendicular from the centre bisects the chord" directly in a numeric problem, but you should still know the RHS-congruence reasoning behind it in case a proof-based question does appear.
What if I am given the chord length and the radius, and asked for the distance from the centre, instead of the other way round?
The same equation works in either direction — you are just solving for a different unknown. Halve the chord to get , square both and , subtract, and take the square root to get . Worked example 2 in this article — a chord in a radius- circle — does exactly this and gives ; the algebra is identical, only the quantity you isolate changes.