Bauxite purification

Mined bauxite is not aluminium oxide — it is a dirty rock, roughly half Al₂O₃ but tangled up with iron(III) oxide, silica and titanium oxide. Feed that mixture straight into an electrolytic cell and you get a poorly conducting melt and a contaminated metal, so before any electricity is spent, the ore must be cleaned down to pure alumina. The trick is not a physical sieve or a magnet — it is a single chemical fact: aluminium oxide is amphoteric, iron oxide is not. That one difference in reactivity is enough to turn a stubborn solid-solid mixture into an easy dissolve-and-filter separation, and it is the reasoning this article walks through, from the raw ore to the calcined, electrolysis-ready alumina, with a stoichiometry check on how much product each step actually delivers.

The core insight

Because Al₂O₃ is amphoteric and dissolves in hot concentrated NaOH while Fe₂O₃ does not, bauxite purification separates the two oxides by dissolving, filtering, precipitating and calcining rather than by any physical method.

The core idea

Crude bauxite is essentially hydrated aluminium oxide, Al₂O₃·2H₂O, mined together with iron(III) oxide (Fe₂O₃) as the major impurity, plus smaller amounts of silica (sand) and titanium oxide. None of these impurities can simply be picked out or washed away — they are chemically bound into the same lump of ore. The purification therefore has to exploit a difference in chemical behaviour, not a difference in size, density or colour. That difference is amphoterism. Aluminium oxide reacts with both acids and strong alkalis, so it dissolves when the crushed ore is boiled with hot, concentrated sodium hydroxide:

Al2O3+2NaOH→2NaAlO2+H2O\text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 + 2\text{NaOH} \rightarrow 2\text{NaAlO}_2 + \text{H}_2\text{O}

where: Al₂O₃ is the wanted oxide, NaOH is the hot concentrated alkali used to attack it, NaAlO₂ is soluble sodium aluminate, and H₂O is released as the by-product. Iron(III) oxide is a simple basic oxide — it has no acidic character at all — so it does not react with NaOH and stays behind as an insoluble solid. Because one oxide has dissolved and the other has not, a single filtration now does all the separating: the Fe₂O₃ (with the silica and titanium oxide) is left on the filter paper as residue, while the aluminium leaves the process dissolved, as sodium aluminate, in the filtrate. The filtrate is then diluted or seeded so that pure aluminium hydroxide, Al(OH)₃, precipitates back out of solution — the reverse of the dissolving step, now purified of everything the residue carried away. Finally this hydroxide precipitate is filtered off and heated strongly (calcined), driving off water and leaving pure alumina behind:

2Al(OH)3→ΔAl2O3+3H2O↑2\text{Al(OH)}_3 \xrightarrow{\Delta} \text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 + 3\text{H}_2\text{O}\uparrow

where: Al(OH)₃ is the precipitated hydroxide, Δ\Delta denotes strong heating, Al₂O₃ is the pure alumina finally obtained, and H₂O escapes as steam. This last step is the same type of reaction as the calcination of bauxite ore itself — heat drives off a volatile substance, leaving the oxide behind — so it connects naturally to the general metallurgy idea of "roasting/calcining to the oxide" met earlier in the unit. The pure Al₂O₃ produced here is what is dissolved in molten cryolite and electrolysed in the next stage of aluminium extraction; nothing about that electrolysis step is covered here, only the purification that must happen first.

Figure
Flow diagram from crude bauxite through sodium hydroxide treatment and filtration to filtrate and residue then precipitation and calcination to pure alumina
Crude bauxite to pure alumina Crude bauxite Al2O3 + Fe2O3 + SiO2 hot NaOH Al2O3 dissolves Fe2O3 stays solid filter Residue Fe2O3 discarded Filtrate NaAlO2 sodium aluminate dilute, seed Al(OH)3 precipitate filtered off calcine, heat Pure Al2O3 ready for electrolysis
Derivation AMass of pure alumina obtained from a given mass of aluminium hydroxide

The goal is to turn the calcination equation 2Al(OH)3→ΔAl2O3+3H2O2\text{Al(OH)}_3 \xrightarrow{\Delta} \text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 + 3\text{H}_2\text{O} into a working mass relationship, so that the mass of pure alumina recovered from a measured mass of the hydroxide precipitate can be predicted from the balanced equation alone, using only relative atomic masses and the mole ratio fixed by the equation's coefficients.

Step 1. Read off the mole ratio from the balanced equation. Two moles of Al(OH)₃ decompose to give exactly one mole of Al₂O₃, so the fixed ratio is 2:12 : 1 — this ratio does not change no matter how much hydroxide is heated.

Step 2. Convert the ratio into a mass ratio using relative atomic masses Al = 27, O = 16, H = 1. The molar mass of Al(OH)₃ is 27+3(16+1)=78 g/mol27 + 3(16+1) = 78\ \text{g/mol}, so two moles weigh 2×78=156 g2 \times 78 = 156\ \text{g}. The molar mass of Al₂O₃ is 2(27)+3(16)=102 g/mol2(27) + 3(16) = 102\ \text{g/mol}, so one mole weighs 102 g102\ \text{g}.

Step 3. State the mass relationship. Every 156 g156\ \text{g} of Al(OH)₃ calcined yields 102 g102\ \text{g} of Al₂O₃, so for any mass mm of hydroxide the alumina obtained is

mass of Al2O3=m×102156\text{mass of Al}_2\text{O}_3 = m \times \frac{102}{156}

where: mm is the mass of Al(OH)₃ heated (grams), 156156 g is the mass of two moles of Al(OH)₃, and 102102 g is the mass of one mole of Al₂O₃ produced from it.

Step 4. Sanity-check the direction. Water is lost as steam during calcination, so the product mass must be less than the starting mass; indeed 102/156≈0.65102/156 \approx 0.65, confirming that only about 65% of the hydroxide's mass survives as alumina, the rest escaping as H₂O.

Worked example

Question: A sample of 780 g of pure aluminium hydroxide precipitate, obtained after filtering the sodium aluminate solution, is heated strongly until decomposition is complete. Calculate the mass of pure aluminium oxide obtained.

Step 1. Write the balanced equation and its molar masses: 2Al(OH)3→ΔAl2O3+3H2O2\text{Al(OH)}_3 \xrightarrow{\Delta} \text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 + 3\text{H}_2\text{O}, with 156 g156\ \text{g} Al(OH)₃ giving 102 g102\ \text{g} Al₂O₃, as found above.

Step 2. Set up the proportion for the given mass: 780 g780\ \text{g} of Al(OH)₃ is exactly 780/156=5780/156 = 5 times the equation's base amount of 156 g156\ \text{g}.

Step 3. Scale the alumina mass by the same factor: mass of Al₂O₃ =5×102 g=510 g= 5 \times 102\ \text{g} = 510\ \text{g}.

Step 4 (check). The mass lost as water should be 780−510=270 g780 - 510 = 270\ \text{g}, which should equal 5×3×18 g=270 g5 \times 3 \times 18\ \text{g} = 270\ \text{g} (three moles of H₂O, molar mass 18, scaled by 5) — it matches, confirming the arithmetic.

Answer: 510 g of pure aluminium oxide is obtained from 780 g of aluminium hydroxide.

Competitive stretch

The same 510 g of Al₂O₃ would have needed how much NaOH to dissolve it in the first place? From Al2O3+2NaOH→2NaAlO2+H2O\text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 + 2\text{NaOH} \rightarrow 2\text{NaAlO}_2 + \text{H}_2\text{O}, one mole of Al₂O₃ (102 g) reacts with two moles of NaOH (2×40=802 \times 40 = 80 g). Since 510/102=5510/102 = 5 moles of Al₂O₃, the NaOH required is 5×80=400 g5 \times 80 = 400\ \text{g} — a reminder that the two equations in this process chain to a single mass budget from ore to oxide.

Common traps

  • Thinking crude bauxite can be electrolysed directly. Impurities such as Fe₂O₃ must be removed first; only pure alumina is fed into the electrolytic cell.
  • Treating the separation as purely physical. Filtration is only the last mechanical step; the real separation happens earlier, when Al₂O₃ dissolves selectively in NaOH and Fe₂O₃ does not.
  • Confusing aluminium hydroxide and aluminium oxide. The precipitate from the sodium aluminate solution is Al(OH)₃, which still needs calcination to become Al₂O₃.
  • Using the wrong mole ratio in stoichiometry. The calcination equation gives 2 mol Al(OH)₃ to 1 mol Al₂O₃, not 1:1 — dropping the coefficient of 2 is the commonest arithmetic slip.

Ask the tutor: want to see exactly how this purified alumina is then electrolysed into aluminium metal — ask the AI tutor to walk through the electrolysis step next.

Why does iron oxide not dissolve when aluminium oxide does, if both are metal oxides?

Metal oxides are usually basic, and Fe2O3 behaves exactly as expected for one, reacting with acids but not with alkalis. Al2O3 is unusual among common metal oxides because it is amphoteric, meaning it can also react with a strong base like NaOH, forming soluble sodium aluminate. That single extra reactivity is what lets it dissolve while Fe2O3, having no such acidic behaviour, is left completely untouched and stays solid.

Could you purify bauxite by just washing or heating it without using sodium hydroxide?

No, because the impurities are not loosely stuck to the surface, they are part of the same rock, chemically and physically mixed at a fine scale that no washing or heating alone could separate. Only a chemical reaction that treats Al2O3 and Fe2O3 differently can pull them apart. Hot concentrated NaOH provides exactly that: it reacts with and dissolves one oxide while leaving the other completely unreacted, which is what makes filtration afterwards effective.

Why calcine the aluminium hydroxide instead of using it directly in electrolysis?

Electrolytic reduction needs the aluminium compound dissolved in molten cryolite as the oxide, Al2O3, not as the hydroxide. Al(OH)3 still carries chemically bound water and does not behave the same way in the molten electrolyte. Heating it strongly decomposes it, driving off that water as steam and leaving pure Al2O3 behind, which is the correct feedstock for the electrolysis step that follows purification.

Before this

Where this leads