Reflection
Stand a point in front of a mirror and its reflection sits exactly as far behind the glass as the point is in front of it, directly opposite, along the perpendicular to the mirror. Coordinate geometry turns that everyday picture into arithmetic: given a point and a mirror line — the x-axis, the y-axis, a vertical line , a horizontal line , or the origin itself — you can write down the image point using a short rule, no drawing required. This article covers exactly the five reflections prescribed for ICSE Class 10: their coordinate rules, the idea of an invariant point (a point that lands back on itself), and how to chain two reflections one after another. Reflection in any other, slanted line is outside this syllabus.
Reflecting in a mirror line flips only the coordinate that the line fixes, and a point is invariant exactly when it already lies on that mirror line.
The core idea
A reflection is a rigid flip: the mirror line acts like a hinge, and every point swaps sides while staying the same perpendicular distance from the line. For a vertical mirror the x-coordinate is the one measured perpendicular to the line, so it flips; for a horizontal mirror the y-coordinate flips. Everything below follows from that one idea. Notice too that a reflection preserves shape and size exactly — if you reflect every vertex of a triangle, the image is congruent to the original triangle, just flipped, which is why reflections belong to the family of isometries (distance-preserving transformations) alongside translations and rotations. It helps to separate the five prescribed reflections into two families. The first three — reflection in the y-axis, the x-axis, and the origin — are all reflections in lines (or a point) that pass through the origin, so their rules involve only a sign change, nothing more. The second two — reflection in and — are reflections in lines that may sit anywhere on the plane, so their rules involve the constant as well as a sign change. Once you see the origin cases as the special case of the general vertical or horizontal mirror, all five rules collapse into just two patterns to remember.
Reflection in the y-axis, (a vertical line): only the x-coordinate flips sign.
Reflection in the x-axis, (a horizontal line): only the y-coordinate flips sign.
Reflection in the origin: both coordinates flip sign — the same result as reflecting in and then in .
Reflection in the vertical line : the y-coordinate is untouched; the x-coordinate reflects about rather than about .
where: is the fixed x-value of the mirror line, and is the point on the opposite side of that is the same distance from as is.
Reflection in the horizontal line : the x-coordinate is untouched; the y-coordinate reflects about .
An invariant point is one whose image is itself, . Every point on the mirror line is invariant under reflection in that line — a point on (the y-axis) stays put when reflected in ; a point on stays put when reflected in . Only the origin is invariant under reflection in the origin, since forces and together. This is worth stating as a general principle: a point is invariant under a given reflection precisely when it already satisfies the equation of the mirror line, because a point on the mirror is its own perpendicular foot, so there is zero distance to reflect across. For , that means any point with x-coordinate exactly is invariant, no matter what its y-coordinate is — the mirror line contains infinitely many such points, one for every value of .
The goal is to justify, from the plain requirement that a reflected point sits the same perpendicular distance from the mirror on the opposite side, why reflecting in the vertical line must give the image , so that the rule can be trusted as a formula rather than memorised blindly.
Step 1. Fix what stays the same. The mirror line is vertical, so it is perpendicular to the x-direction only; distances measured in the y-direction are parallel to the mirror and are not affected by reflecting across it. So the y-coordinate of must equal the y-coordinate of : it stays .
Step 2. Measure the perpendicular distance from to the mirror. The mirror sits at and sits at , so the horizontal distance between them is (a signed quantity — positive if is to the left of the mirror, negative if to the right).
Step 3. Place the image the same distance on the far side. If is a distance to the left of the mirror, its image must be that same distance to the right of the mirror, i.e. at x-coordinate . Simplifying, .
Step 4. Combine the two coordinates. The y-coordinate is unchanged (Step 1) and the x-coordinate is (Step 3), giving the image . Setting recovers the y-axis rule as a special case, confirming the formula is consistent with the simpler reflections already stated.
Worked example
Question: The point is reflected in the line to get , and is then reflected in the line to get . Find and , and state whether is invariant under the first reflection.
Step 1. Reflect in using with : .
Step 2. Compare with . Since is identical to , the point is invariant under reflection in — which makes sense, because 's x-coordinate is already , so lies exactly on the mirror line.
Step 3. Reflect in using with : .
Final answer: and ; is an invariant point under the first reflection (in ) but not under the second (in ), since .
Competitive stretch
If instead were reflected in first, would it be invariant? Check: passes through 's y-coordinate exactly, so — yes, invariant, by the same logic as Step 2.
Common traps
- Mixing up which coordinate changes: reflection in (a vertical line) changes the x-coordinate; reflection in (a horizontal line) changes the y-coordinate. Match the axis letter in the line's equation to the coordinate that changes.
- Writing instead of the correct for reflection in — a common arithmetic slip; always double the mirror's coordinate before subtracting.
- Assuming a point is invariant because one coordinate looks close to the mirror's value — invariance requires the coordinate to be exactly equal to , not merely nearby.
- Confusing reflection in the origin (both coordinates flip) with reflection in a single axis (only one coordinate flips).
Ask the tutor: want to check a reflection image you calculated, or try chaining three reflections in a row to see where a point ends up?
How do I remember which coordinate changes for x equals a versus y equals a?
Read the mirror's equation as naming the axis it runs parallel to being fixed for that coordinate, but it is easier to think perpendicular: a line is vertical, so distances are measured horizontally across it, meaning the x-coordinate is the one that reflects to while y stays put. A line is horizontal, so the y-coordinate reflects to while x stays put. If you ever forget, set mentally and check it reduces to the familiar axis rule.
Why is the formula 2a minus x and not just a minus x?
Because only gives the distance from to the mirror (signed), not the image's coordinate. The image must sit that same distance further past the mirror, so you add the distance to again: . Testing with a number helps — for reflected in , the image should be at (since and are both units from ), and checks out, while clearly does not.
If a question chains two reflections, does the order matter?
Yes, in general. Reflecting first in then in can give a different final point than reflecting first in then in , because each reflection only touches its own coordinate — but which point you start from after the first reflection changes what the second reflection acts on. Always apply the reflections strictly in the order the question states, recomputing the intermediate image before applying the second rule.