Trigonometric identities

Take any right-angled triangle, however it is drawn or scaled, and three relationships between its angle's trigonometric ratios hold no matter what. These are trigonometric identities — equations in sin⁡A\sin A, cos⁡A\cos A, tan⁡A\tan A and their reciprocals that are true for every value of AA from 0∘0^\circ to 90∘90^\circ, unlike an ordinary equation such as tan⁡A=1\tan A = 1, which is true only at A=45∘A = 45^\circ. ICSE Class 10 asks you to know exactly three such identities, all born from a single Pythagoras relation, and to use them — plus ordinary algebra — to simplify expressions and prove that two sides of a statement are equal. This article expands the Pass-1 groundwork into a fuller working toolkit: the derivation of the identities, the algebraic patterns examiners love to hide inside a question, a fully worked proof and simplification, and the traps that lose easy marks.

The core insight

Dividing a2+b2=h2a^2+b^2=h^2 by h2h^2, b2b^2 and a2a^2 in turn gives the three Pythagorean identities sin⁡2A+cos⁡2A=1\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1, 1+tan⁡2A=sec⁡2A1+\tan^2A=\sec^2A, 1+cot⁡2A=csc⁡2A1+\cot^2A=\csc^2A, which can be rearranged and combined with ordinary algebra to simplify or prove any trigonometric expression for 0∘≤A≤90∘0^\circ \le A \le 90^\circ.

The core idea

One triangle, three identities. Picture a right triangle with angle AA, side opposite AA of length aa, side adjacent to AA of length bb, and hypotenuse hh. Pythagoras' theorem gives a2+b2=h2a^2+b^2=h^2. Dividing every term by h2h^2, then by b2b^2, then by a2a^2, and using sin⁡A=a/h\sin A = a/h, cos⁡A=b/h\cos A = b/h, tan⁡A=a/b\tan A = a/b, sec⁡A=h/b\sec A = h/b, cot⁡A=b/a\cot A = b/a, csc⁡A=h/a\csc A = h/a, produces the three identities you must know cold:

sin⁡2A+cos⁡2A=1,1+tan⁡2A=sec⁡2A,1+cot⁡2A=csc⁡2A\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1, \qquad 1+\tan^2A=\sec^2A, \qquad 1+\cot^2A=\csc^2A

where: AA is the acute angle of the triangle, and each pair of ratios (sin⁡,cos⁡\sin,\cos), (tan⁡,sec⁡\tan,\sec), (cot⁡,csc⁡\cot,\csc) is grouped because they come from dividing the same Pythagorean relation by the same square.

Rearranged forms are the real exam skill. Since these are identities, every term can be isolated and the resulting equation is just as valid:

sin⁡2A=1−cos⁡2A,sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1,csc⁡2A−cot⁡2A=1\sin^2A = 1-\cos^2A,\qquad \sec^2A-\tan^2A=1,\qquad \csc^2A-\cot^2A=1

Almost every "prove that…" question is really asking you to spot which of these six forms (three identities, three rearrangements) turns a messy expression into something that cancels.

Two algebraic patterns do most of the work. Expanding (sin⁡A+cos⁡A)2(\sin A + \cos A)^2 with the ordinary identity (x+y)2=x2+2xy+y2(x+y)^2 = x^2+2xy+y^2 gives sin⁡2A+2sin⁡Acos⁡A+cos⁡2A=1+2sin⁡Acos⁡A\sin^2A+2\sin A\cos A+\cos^2A = 1+2\sin A\cos A, using sin⁡2A+cos⁡2A=1\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1. And a difference of squares, (sec⁡A−tan⁡A)(sec⁡A+tan⁡A)=sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1(\sec A-\tan A)(\sec A+\tan A) = \sec^2A-\tan^2A = 1, is the single most-tested trick in this unit — it appears whenever an expression has sec⁡A±tan⁡A\sec A \pm \tan A or csc⁡A±cot⁡A\csc A \pm \cot A in it. Recognising these two shapes on sight is what separates a fast, confident proof from a stalled one.

Figure
A right triangle with sides a b h labelled and three arrows showing division by h squared b squared and a squared leading to the three Pythagorean identities
One triangle, three identities A b (adjacent) a (opposite) h (hypotenuse) a² + b² = h² ÷h² ÷b² ÷a² sin²A + cos²A = 1 1 + tan²A = sec²A 1 + cot²A = csc²A Each identity is the same Pythagoras relation seen through a different pair of ratios.
Derivation AThe identity 1 + tan squared A equals sec squared A

The goal is to derive the second Pythagorean identity, 1+tan⁡2A=sec⁡2A1+\tan^2A=\sec^2A, directly from Pythagoras' theorem applied to a right triangle with angle AA, opposite side aa, adjacent side bb and hypotenuse hh, so that its origin is never a mystery and its rearranged forms can be trusted without re-deriving them each time.

Step 1. Start from Pythagoras' theorem for the triangle: a2+b2=h2a^2+b^2=h^2. This holds for any right triangle, regardless of the size of angle AA.

Step 2. Divide every term by b2b^2 (the adjacent side squared), since b≠0b \ne 0 for 0∘≤A<90∘0^\circ \le A < 90^\circ: a2b2+b2b2=h2b2\dfrac{a^2}{b^2}+\dfrac{b^2}{b^2}=\dfrac{h^2}{b^2}, which simplifies to (ab)2+1=(hb)2\left(\dfrac{a}{b}\right)^2 + 1 = \left(\dfrac{h}{b}\right)^2.

Step 3. Substitute the ratio definitions tan⁡A=a/b\tan A = a/b and sec⁡A=h/b\sec A = h/b into the two squared terms: (ab)2=tan⁡2A\left(\dfrac{a}{b}\right)^2 = \tan^2A and (hb)2=sec⁡2A\left(\dfrac{h}{b}\right)^2=\sec^2A, so the equation from Step 2 becomes tan⁡2A+1=sec⁡2A\tan^2A+1=\sec^2A, usually written 1+tan⁡2A=sec⁡2A1+\tan^2A=\sec^2A.

Step 4. Rearrange for later use: subtracting tan⁡2A\tan^2A from both sides gives sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1\sec^2A-\tan^2A=1, the difference-of-squares form used constantly in proofs. The identical division-by-a2a^2 argument, using cot⁡A=b/a\cot A=b/a and csc⁡A=h/a\csc A=h/a, gives the third identity 1+cot⁡2A=csc⁡2A1+\cot^2A=\csc^2A by the same three steps.

Worked example

Prove that 1sec⁡A+tan⁡A=sec⁡A−tan⁡A\dfrac{1}{\sec A+\tan A} = \sec A - \tan A, for 0∘≤A≤90∘0^\circ \le A \le 90^\circ, A≠90∘A \ne 90^\circ, and then use the result to simplify (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)+2tan⁡2A−sec⁡2A(\sec A+\tan A)(\sec A - \tan A) + 2\tan^2A - \sec^2A.

Step 1. Start the proof from the right-hand side, since it is the simpler expression: RHS=sec⁡A−tan⁡A\text{RHS} = \sec A - \tan A. Multiply and divide by (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(\sec A+\tan A) so the difference-of-squares pattern appears: sec⁡A−tan⁡A=(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)(sec⁡A+tan⁡A)sec⁡A+tan⁡A=sec⁡2A−tan⁡2Asec⁡A+tan⁡A\sec A-\tan A = \dfrac{(\sec A-\tan A)(\sec A+\tan A)}{\sec A+\tan A} = \dfrac{\sec^2A-\tan^2A}{\sec A+\tan A}.

Step 2. Apply sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1\sec^2A-\tan^2A=1 (from the derivation above) to the numerator: sec⁡2A−tan⁡2Asec⁡A+tan⁡A=1sec⁡A+tan⁡A\dfrac{\sec^2A-\tan^2A}{\sec A+\tan A} = \dfrac{1}{\sec A+\tan A}. This is exactly the left-hand side, so LHS=RHS\text{LHS}=\text{RHS}, and the identity is proved.

Step 3. Now use it to simplify (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)+2tan⁡2A−sec⁡2A(\sec A+\tan A)(\sec A-\tan A)+2\tan^2A-\sec^2A. The bracketed product is again a difference of squares: (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)=sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1(\sec A+\tan A)(\sec A-\tan A) = \sec^2A-\tan^2A = 1.

Step 4. Substitute this back: 1+2tan⁡2A−sec⁡2A1+2\tan^2A-\sec^2A. Replace sec⁡2A\sec^2A using sec⁡2A=1+tan⁡2A\sec^2A=1+\tan^2A: 1+2tan⁡2A−(1+tan⁡2A)=1+2tan⁡2A−1−tan⁡2A=tan⁡2A1+2\tan^2A-(1+\tan^2A) = 1+2\tan^2A-1-\tan^2A = \tan^2A. The proof holds, and the expression simplifies to tan⁡2A\tan^2A.

Competitive stretch

If instead you were given sec⁡A+tan⁡A=3\sec A + \tan A = 3, the just-proved identity lets you find sec⁡A−tan⁡A\sec A - \tan A instantly without knowing AA: since (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)=1(\sec A+\tan A)(\sec A-\tan A)=1, it follows that sec⁡A−tan⁡A=1/3\sec A - \tan A = 1/3. Adding the two equations gives 2sec⁡A=3+13=1032\sec A = 3+\tfrac13 = \tfrac{10}{3}, so sec⁡A=53\sec A = \tfrac{5}{3} and tan⁡A=3−53=43\tan A = 3-\tfrac{5}{3}=\tfrac{4}{3} — a full solution using only the identity, no triangle-solving required.

Common traps

  • Confusing sin⁡2A\sin^2A with sin⁡A2\sin A^2. sin⁡2A\sin^2A means (sin⁡A)2(\sin A)^2 — the whole ratio is squared, not the angle.
  • Trying to "prove" an identity by plugging in one angle, such as A=30∘A=30^\circ. That checks a single case, not a general proof; full marks need the algebraic route shown above.
  • Manipulating both sides at once. Pick the messier side, simplify it step by step using the identities, and show it becomes the other side — mixing operations across both sides gets confusing and error-prone.
  • Sign slips when rearranging, e.g. writing tan⁡2A=1−sec⁡2A\tan^2A = 1-\sec^2A instead of the correct sec⁡2A−1\sec^2A-1. Always rearrange one identity at a time and re-check the sign.
  • Forgetting the domain restriction. tan⁡A\tan A and sec⁡A\sec A blow up at A=90∘A=90^\circ; cot⁡A\cot A and csc⁡A\csc A blow up at A=0∘A=0^\circ. ICSE questions are usually set to avoid these values, but stay alert if a range is given explicitly.

Ask the tutor: if a "prove that…" question is not clicking, ask the AI tutor for a fresh practice expression and step-by-step feedback on which identity and pattern to use.

Why are there exactly three trigonometric identities in the Class 10 syllabus, not six?

There really is only one underlying relation — Pythagoras' theorem, a2+b2=h2a^2+b^2=h^2 — and dividing it by h2h^2, b2b^2 or a2a^2 produces the three forms sin⁡2A+cos⁡2A=1\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1, 1+tan⁡2A=sec⁡2A1+\tan^2A=\sec^2A, 1+cot⁡2A=csc⁡2A1+\cot^2A=\csc^2A. Every other equation you use, such as sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A=1\sec^2A-\tan^2A=1 or sin⁡2A=1−cos⁡2A\sin^2A=1-\cos^2A, is just one of these three rearranged algebraically, not a fourth independent fact. Knowing the derivation means you never have to memorise the rearrangements separately — you can rebuild any of them in seconds.

How do I know which side to start simplifying when proving an identity?

Start from the side that looks more complicated — the one with more terms, a fraction, or a product waiting to be expanded — and work it down toward the simpler side. In the worked example, sec⁡A−tan⁡A\sec A-\tan A was chosen as the starting point over 1/(sec⁡A+tan⁡A)1/(\sec A+\tan A) because multiplying by a conjugate is easier to do to a simple expression than trying to "un-simplify" a fraction. If both sides look equally complex, either side works; just never edit both sides simultaneously, since that can accidentally prove something false look true.

What is the fastest way to spot which identity to use in a simplification question?

Look for two tell-tale shapes. If you see sin⁡2A\sin^2A and cos⁡2A\cos^2A added or subtracted, or one of them alone with a 11 nearby, reach for sin⁡2A+cos⁡2A=1\sin^2A+\cos^2A=1. If you see sec⁡A\sec A and tan⁡A\tan A (or csc⁡A\csc A and cot⁡A\cot A) either as a product of a sum and a difference, like (sec⁡A+tan⁡A)(sec⁡A−tan⁡A)(\sec A+\tan A)(\sec A-\tan A), or as sec⁡2A−tan⁡2A\sec^2A-\tan^2A directly, that is always the difference-of-squares identity collapsing to 11. Training your eye to notice these two shapes clears most ICSE questions in one or two steps.

Before this

Where this leads