Solving linear inequations
An equation like pins down to exactly one number. Loosen the equals sign to "greater than" or "less than" and the picture changes completely: now a whole crowd of values can satisfy the statement. is true for , for , for — for every number less than . That crowd is the solution set, and finding it is the job of this chapter. The method looks almost identical to solving an equation — simplify, transpose, divide — with one sharp exception that trips up nearly every student the first time: multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number flips the inequality sign. Get that one rule solid, learn to read the answer back onto a number line, and this chapter becomes one of the most mechanical, mark-scoring topics in ICSE Class 8 algebra.
Solving a linear inequation uses the same transposition steps as solving an equation, except that multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the inequality sign, and the answer is a whole set of values shown on a number line rather than a single number.
The core idea
An inequation compares two expressions with , , or instead of . A linear inequation in one variable is one where that variable appears only to the first power, such as or . Three properties govern how an inequation behaves under the operations you already use to solve equations. Adding or subtracting the same quantity from both sides never disturbs the direction of the inequality:
where: and are the two sides being compared and is any number added to both. Multiplying or dividing both sides by the same positive number also leaves the direction untouched, but multiplying or dividing by the same negative number reverses it:
where: is the multiplier — its sign, not its size, decides whether the arrow flips. The working method is then: simplify both sides (clear brackets, clear denominators, combine like terms), transpose so variable terms sit on one side and constants on the other, then divide by the coefficient of the variable — flipping the sign if that coefficient is negative. Finally, state the solution set within whichever number system the question names (, , or ), and, if asked, mark it on a number line: a filled (solid) circle at a boundary that is included (, ), an open (hollow) circle at a boundary that is excluded (, ), with an arrow running in the direction of every value that belongs to the set. Unlike an equation, which almost always pins the variable to one number, a linear inequation typically leaves infinitely many numbers satisfying it — every value on one side of the boundary. That is the real shift in thinking this chapter asks for: instead of asking "which single number works," you are asking "which entire stretch of the number line works," and the boundary point itself may or may not be part of the answer depending on whether the original symbol was strict (, ) or included equality (, ).
The main grounded fact of this chapter — the rule most exam marks are lost or won on — deserves a proper proof rather than just a numerical demonstration, so this derivation shows algebraically, from nothing more than the already-established addition property of inequalities, why multiplying both sides of by a negative number must force the sign to flip to , and why that flip is a forced consequence of arithmetic rather than an arbitrary rule.
Step 1. Start from the given fact . Using the addition property, subtract from both sides: , which simplifies to . In words, is a positive number whenever — this is just a restatement of what "less than" means, and it holds for every real, whole, natural or integer value of and .
Step 2. Since , the number is positive. Multiply both sides of by the positive number . Multiplying an inequality by a positive number is already known to preserve its direction, so , which gives .
Step 3. Expand the right-hand side: . So the inequality from Step 2 reads .
Step 4. Add to both sides (addition never changes direction): , which is the same statement as . Starting only from and , algebra alone forced the sign to reverse — it is not a convention someone invented, it is a consequence of what negative numbers do to order. This is exactly why Step 3 of the worked example below, dividing by , must turn into .
Worked example
Solve for , and represent the solution on a number line.
Step 1. Clear the bracket. , so the inequation becomes
Step 2. Transpose the variable terms to one side and constants to the other. Subtract from both sides and add to both sides:
Step 3. Divide both sides by . Because is negative, the inequality sign reverses:
Step 4. Restrict to integers and check the boundary. Since , the solution set is , every integer less than or equal to . Substitute the boundary value into the original inequation to verify: left side ; right side . Since is true, is correctly included. On the number line this is a filled circle at with an arrow extending left. The solution is , .
Common traps
- Forgetting to reverse the inequality sign when multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number, as happened in Step 3 above — this single slip accounts for most lost marks in the chapter.
- Drawing a filled circle where an open one belongs, or vice versa: and need an open (hollow) circle because the boundary is excluded; and need a filled (solid) circle because the boundary is included.
- Ignoring the number system stated in the question — if is restricted to or , the answer must be listed as specific values like , not left as a continuous inequality such as .
- Losing track of a sign while clearing a bracket, especially a bracket preceded by a minus sign, before the transposition step even begins.
Ask the tutor: If the sign-reversal rule or restricting solutions to , or still feels shaky, ask the AI tutor to work through a few more inequations with you step by step.
Why does the sign flip only for negative numbers and not for positive ones?
Multiplying by a positive number stretches or shrinks the number line without turning it around, so the left-right order of any two numbers is preserved. Multiplying by a negative number flips the whole line about zero, like a mirror, so whichever number was further right becomes further left. The derivation above proves this algebraically: starting from , multiplying by a negative can be traced step by step to , so the flip is a forced consequence of arithmetic, not a rule to memorise blindly.
Do I always have to draw a number line, or can I just write the inequality?
Read the question. If it says "represent on a number line" or "show graphically," you must draw it, choosing open or filled circles correctly and an arrow in the right direction. If it only says "solve," writing the inequality or the set, such as or for , is enough. When in doubt, a quick sketch costs little time and protects marks that a diagram-only question would otherwise claim.
What if the variable is restricted to whole numbers or natural numbers instead of integers?
Then the solution is not a continuous ray but a finite or one-directional list of specific values. Remember includes while does not. For example, if solving gave with , the answer is the finite set , and on the number line you would mark only those five dots rather than drawing a continuous shaded ray.