Square of a binomial
Multiply by itself the long way and it takes four separate products before you can even start collecting terms. Do it a hundred times in an exam and the slow method costs you minutes you don't have. The square of a binomial identity turns that whole multiplication into a fixed three-term pattern you can write down on sight. This topic sits inside the Class 8 chapter Algebraic Identities, right after Algebraic Expressions, where the distributive law was used to multiply two binomials term by term. Here that same multiplication is applied to a binomial times itself, and the result is frozen into two identities worth memorising cold: and . Beyond expanding expressions, the identities double as a mental-maths shortcut for squaring numbers like or , and as a way to find from and without ever solving for and . Multi-term squares like are Class 9 material and stay out of scope here.
Squaring a binomial always gives three terms — square of the first term, plus or minus twice the product of the two terms, plus square of the second term — never just the sum of the two squares.
The core idea
A binomial has exactly two terms, such as or . Squaring it means multiplying the binomial by itself, and expanding that product with the distributive law gives a pattern that never changes.
Expanding . Write the square as a product and distribute:
where: and are the two terms of the binomial (numbers, variables, or both), and are their individual squares, and is twice their product — the middle term that is easy to forget.
Expanding . The same distribution with a subtraction gives:
The only difference between the two identities is the sign of the middle term. The first and last terms, and , are always added and always positive, because a square can never be negative — even if itself is negative.
A connecting identity. Because both expansions share the same part, they can be combined to isolate it:
where: this lets you compute directly from (or ) and , without ever finding the individual values of and . The cleanest way to see why the middle term is and not just is a picture: a square of side splits into a smaller square of side , a smaller square of side , and two identical rectangles of sides and sandwiched between them.
Adding the four regions gives , the total area of the big square — the picture and the algebra agree term for term. This model is worth redrawing mentally whenever the identity feels abstract, and it also explains why the last term is always : it is literally the area of a square, which can never be negative. It also helps to see the two identities side by side, term by term, so the pattern is unmistakable:
| Expression | First term squared | Middle term | Last term squared |
|---|---|---|---|
The two rows differ in exactly one place — the sign in front of the middle term. Everything else, including the fact that both outer terms are squares and therefore always non-negative, is identical between the addition and subtraction cases. Keeping this table in mind is often faster than re-deriving the sign from scratch during an exam. These identities are not confined to pure algebra drills. In mensuration, if a square's side is given as a binomial such as cm, its area follows instantly as square cm, with no measuring or redrawing required. Recognising the binomial-square pattern on sight — rather than reaching for full distributive multiplication every single time — is exactly the fluency this topic is meant to build, and it pays off again almost immediately: the very next chapter reverses these same identities to factorise perfect-square trinomials like back into .
Show step by step, starting only from the definition of squaring an expression and the distributive law learned for multiplying two binomials, that expands to exactly and that expands to exactly , so that both identities can be trusted as fixed patterns rather than re-derived every time they are used.
Step 1. Squaring a quantity means multiplying it by itself, so by definition . This is nothing new — it is the same meaning of "squared" used for a single number, just applied to the two-term expression .
Step 2. Treat the first bracket as a single block and distribute it over the second bracket, the same way was multiplied by another binomial in the previous chapter: .
Step 3. Distribute and separately into their brackets: and . Adding these two results gives .
Step 4. Collect the two identical middle terms, , to reach the final form . This confirms with no assumption beyond ordinary multiplication.
Step 5. For subtraction, treat as and repeat the same steps with replaced by : , since but . This proves , differing from the first identity only in the sign of the middle term.
Worked example
Expand using the identity, verify by direct multiplication, then use the same identity to find mentally.
Step 1. Match to the pattern with and .
Step 2. Compute each piece: , the middle term , and .
Step 3. Add the pieces in order to get .
Step 4. Verify by direct multiplication: . Both methods agree, so is confirmed.
Step 5. For , write and apply with , : , , , giving . The identity turns a clumsy long multiplication into three easy squares and one subtraction, so and .
Competitive stretch
Given and , find without solving for and . Use . Checking against the actual roots : , matching exactly — the shortcut works even though and were never found individually.
Common traps
- Writing and dropping the middle term entirely — always check the expansion has exactly three terms, not two.
- Getting the sign of the middle term wrong in : it is , but the last term stays positive, never .
- Forgetting to square the coefficient along with the variable: , not .
- Applying the identity to expressions with more than two terms, such as — that needs full distributive expansion, not this two-term identity, and is beyond Class 8 scope.
- Trying to shortcut using rearrangements like without first mastering the basic expansion — always be able to fall back on direct multiplication to check any identity-based shortcut.
Ask the tutor: Want to see how these same identities get reversed to factorise perfect-square trinomials, or need more mental-squaring practice with numbers like ?
Why is the middle term always 2ab and not just ab?
Because is a product of two identical brackets, distribution produces the cross terms twice — once as times from the first bracket, once as times from the second. Adding those two equal terms gives . It is not a rule to memorise separately; it falls straight out of multiplying term by term, so re-deriving it once, as in the derivation above, is the best way to make it stick permanently rather than mixing it up with a plain later.
Can I use this identity for something like 995 squared?
Yes, and that is exactly the kind of number it is built for. Write , then apply with and : . Choosing as a round number close to the target and as the small remaining difference is the standard trick for mental squaring, and the same trick works for numbers just above a round number too — for example .
Does this identity work if b is negative or a fraction?
Yes — and can be any real numbers, including negatives, fractions, or algebraic terms with variables. If is negative, substitute it with its sign; for example with actually becomes before squaring, so the middle term's sign flips accordingly once the actual value is plugged in. The identity itself never changes; only the arithmetic of substituting the actual values of and does, which is exactly why it is worth practising with a mix of whole numbers, negative numbers, and fractions before an exam.