Time and work
A tank has two taps, or a fence has two painters — how long will the job take when they work together? Time-and-work problems answer exactly this, and the trick is a single shift in thinking: never add the days each person takes, add the fraction of the job each person finishes in one day. Treat the whole job as one unit of work, so a person who finishes it alone in days does of it every day. Two people working side by side simply add their daily fractions, and inverting the sum hands back the number of days. The same one-day-fraction idea also connects this topic to inverse variation: for a fixed job, more workers means fewer days, in exact reciprocal proportion. This article builds that single idea into a reliable method for combined-work and workers-versus-days problems.
Treat the job as 1 unit of work, add individual daily-work rates () to combine workers, and take the reciprocal of the combined rate to get the time together.
The core idea
Work done = Rate of work × Time taken. This is the anchor equation behind every time-and-work problem, and it is just the unitary method applied to "how much of a job gets done."
where: Work done is measured as a fraction of the whole job (the completed job = unit), Rate of work is the fraction of the job finished per day, and Time taken is in days. If someone can finish an entire job alone in days, their rate is of the job per day — this is simply the unitary method run in reverse: instead of asking "how much for one item," it asks "how much in one day."
Combining two workers. When two people work together, their daily fractions simply add, because on any given day each person independently contributes their own share toward finishing the same job, and those shares stack up rather than interfere with each other:
and since Rate Time (one whole job), the time together is the reciprocal of that sum.
The inverse-variation view. For a fixed job, the number of workers and the days needed vary inversely — double the workers, half the time — so
where: are one group's worker-count and days, and are another group's worker-count and days for the same total job, all workers assumed to work at the same steady rate. This is exactly the "total worker-days needed" staying constant.
The goal is to show that when a first worker alone needs days and a second worker alone needs days to finish the same job, working together they finish it in exactly days, a single formula that replaces re-deriving the combined rate from scratch every time.
Step 1. Write each person's daily rate using the unitary method: finishing the whole job (1 unit) in days means of the job gets done in one day, and finishing it in days means of the job gets done in one day.
Step 2. Add the two rates, since in any one day both people contribute their own share toward the same job: combined rate , written over the common denominator .
Step 3. Let be the number of days needed together. Since (combined rate) (time) must equal 1 whole job, , so .
Step 4. Check the formula behaves sensibly: if (two equally fast workers), , exactly half the time either takes alone — matching the intuition that two equal workers double the rate and halve the time.
Worked example
Rahul can paint a fence alone in 12 days, and Priya can paint the same fence alone in 15 days. Working together, how many days will they take?
Step 1. Write each rate: Rahul's rate is of the fence per day, Priya's rate is of the fence per day.
Step 2. Add the rates on a common denominator of 60: of the fence per day together.
Step 3. Take the reciprocal to get the time: days.
Step 4. Cross-check with the shortcut formula: days. Both routes agree.
Rahul and Priya together take days, i.e. 6 days and hours.
Competitive stretch
15 labourers can dig a trench in 8 days. To finish it in only 6 days, how many labourers (at the same rate) are needed? Using : the total labourer-days needed is . For 6 days, labourers . Since fewer days demands more hands, makes sense, and confirms it. 20 labourers are needed — 5 more than before.
Common traps
- Adding days instead of rates. Writing "Rahul + Priya take days" is wrong — you must add the rates , never the days directly.
- Forgetting the final reciprocal. After finding the combined rate (work per day), students sometimes leave it as the answer instead of inverting it to get days.
- Using without the same-rate assumption. It only holds if every worker keeps the same pace and hours per day; if hours per day change too, that factor must be included.
- Mixing up who is faster. Fewer days taken means a higher rate (faster worker), not slower — reversing this gives a combined time larger than either person's individual time, which is never possible.
- Forgetting the combined time must be shorter than both. Whatever comes out to, it must be smaller than the faster worker's own time alone; if a computed "combined" answer is larger than either individual time, a rate has been subtracted or misplaced somewhere in the working.
Ask the tutor: Stuck on setting up a combined-rate problem, or want to check whether your workers-and-days answer makes sense — ask the AI tutor to walk through it with you step by step.
Why do we add rates instead of just averaging the two times?
Averaging the two times (like days) ignores how work actually accumulates: in one day, Rahul finishes of the fence and Priya finishes , and together they genuinely complete both shares in that same single day. Adding the fractions captures that real, simultaneous progress, whereas averaging the days has no physical meaning — it does not correspond to any quantity that actually adds up when two people work side by side.
What if three people work together instead of two?
The same idea extends directly: if a third person alone takes days, add all three daily rates, , to get the combined daily fraction, then take the reciprocal for the total time together. There is no separate three-person formula to memorise — it is the identical unitary-method logic, just with one more fraction added before inverting.
How is this connected to direct and inverse variation, the chapter this topic sits in?
For a fixed amount of work, workers and days needed are inversely proportional: more workers finishing the same job means fewer days, in exact reciprocal step, which is why works — the product (workers times days) stays constant as the "total effort" needed for that job. Combined-rate problems use the same underlying idea, since adding rates is really asking how the fixed job of "1 unit" divides across the combined pace of everyone working.