Metals reacting with water

Drop a pea-sized piece of sodium into a trough of cold water and it skates across the surface, fizzing and sometimes bursting into a lilac flame. Drop a piece of zinc into the same trough and nothing happens at all — not even a bubble. Both are metals; both are, in principle, capable of pulling hydrogen out of water. The difference is how hard water has to be pushed — as cold liquid, as hot liquid, or as scalding steam — before each metal can manage the displacement. This article sorts the common metals of Chapter 6 into those three bands, gives the balanced equation for each, and shows how the pattern is really just the activity series read in a new context, plus a quick stoichiometry calculation for the hydrogen gas produced.

The core insight

A metal displaces hydrogen from water only if it is reactive enough for the conditions on offer — very reactive metals manage it with cold water, moderately reactive metals need hot water or steam, and metals below a certain point in the activity series do not react with water in any form.

The core idea

Three bands, one ladder. Every metal that reacts with water at all does the same basic job — it takes the place of hydrogen in H2OH_2O — but how easily it does so tracks its position in the activity series, the same reactivity order used for reactions with acids and displacement reactions.

  • Cold water: sodium, potassium, and calcium are reactive enough to displace hydrogen from water at room temperature, forming the metal hydroxide and releasing hydrogen gas.
  • Hot water: magnesium sits just below that band — too weak for cold water, but hot water supplies enough extra energy for the same displacement.
  • Steam: aluminium, zinc, and red-hot iron are weaker still; only steam (water vapour at high temperature) is energetic enough to force the reaction, and the high temperature means the product is the metal oxide, not the hydroxide.
  • No reaction: metals below iron in the activity series (copper, silver, gold) do not react with water in any state.

The general pattern for the cold- and hot-water cases is:

2M+2H2O→2MOH+H2↑2M + 2H_2O \rightarrow 2MOH + H_2\uparrow

where: MM is a monovalent reactive metal (sodium or potassium); calcium, being divalent, follows the closely related form Ca+2H2O→Ca(OH)2+H2↑Ca + 2H_2O \rightarrow Ca(OH)_2 + H_2\uparrow. In every case one water molecule contributes one hydroxide group and, together, two water molecules release one molecule of hydrogen gas.

Figure
A ladder of the activity series split into four bands showing which metals react with cold water hot water steam or not at all
Reactivity with water tracks the activity series more less Cold water Na, K, Ca → hydroxide + H2 (vigorous) Hot water Mg → Mg(OH)2 + H2 Steam only Al, Zn, Fe → metal oxide + H2 Fe + steam is reversible: 3Fe + 4H2O ⇌ Fe3O4 + 4H2 No reaction — Cu, Ag, Au and below Going down the ladder, water must be pushed harder (colder to hotter to steam) to force the same displacement.

Why it works

The activity series ranks metals by how easily their atoms lose electrons to form positive ions — the more easily a metal loses electrons, the more strongly it wants to displace a less-willing element (here, the hydrogen in water) from its compound. Sodium and potassium sit at the very top: their outer electron is loosely held, so they tear hydrogen away from cold water almost instantly, releasing enough heat to melt themselves and sometimes ignite the hydrogen produced. Calcium is a little less eager, so its reaction with cold water is steady effervescence rather than a flare-up. Magnesium's electrons are held more tightly, so cold water simply does not supply enough energy for the displacement to start; heating the water gives the reacting particles the extra energy they need to break water's bonds and complete the swap. Aluminium, zinc, and iron are weaker again — heating the water is not enough, so the metal must be exposed to steam, whose particles are both hotter and more energetic than boiling liquid water. At those temperatures the metal hydroxide that would normally form is itself unstable and decomposes, which is why the steam reactions always give the metal oxide, never the hydroxide. Iron's reaction with steam is additionally reversible, because at that same high temperature hydrogen gas can just as easily reduce iron oxide back to iron and steam as the forward reaction can produce it — whichever direction wins depends on whether steam or hydrogen is kept in excess. Below iron, the pull on electrons is too weak for the metal to displace hydrogen from water under any ordinary condition, so copper, silver, and gold show no reaction at all — cold, hot, or as steam.

Worked example

Question: 39 g of potassium is dropped into excess cold water. (a) Write the balanced equation. (b) Calculate the volume of hydrogen gas produced, measured at STP, where 1 mole of gas occupies 22.4 L. (Atomic mass of K = 39.)

Step 1. Write the balanced equation. Potassium is very high in the activity series, so it reacts vigorously with cold water: 2K+2H2O→2KOH+H2↑2K + 2H_2O \rightarrow 2KOH + H_2\uparrow.

Step 2. Convert the given mass of potassium to moles. Moles of K=massatomic mass=39 g39 g/mol=1 molK = \dfrac{\text{mass}}{\text{atomic mass}} = \dfrac{39\ \text{g}}{39\ \text{g/mol}} = 1\ \text{mol}.

Step 3. Use the mole ratio from the balanced equation. The equation shows 2 mol of KK produce 1 mol of H2H_2, a ratio of 2:12:1. So 1 mol of KK produces 12=0.5 mol\dfrac{1}{2} = 0.5\ \text{mol} of H2H_2.

Step 4. Convert moles of hydrogen to volume at STP. Volume =0.5 mol×22.4 L/mol=11.2 L= 0.5\ \text{mol} \times 22.4\ \text{L/mol} = 11.2\ \text{L}.

39 g of potassium reacting with excess cold water releases 11.2 L of hydrogen gas at STP.

Competitive stretch

If the same mass of sodium (23 g = 1 mol, from 2Na+2H2O→2NaOH+H2↑2Na + 2H_2O \rightarrow 2NaOH + H_2\uparrow) reacted instead, the mole ratio is identical (2:12:1), so 1 mol of Na would also release 0.5 mol, or 11.2 L, of hydrogen — the volume of hydrogen depends only on the moles of metal reacting and the equation's ratio, not on which metal (Na, K, or Ca) is used, since all three follow the same 2M:1H22M:1H_2 pattern.

Common traps

  • Assuming every reactive metal reacts with cold water — magnesium needs hot water, and aluminium, zinc, and iron need steam.
  • Writing the product of a steam reaction as a hydroxide — at steam temperatures the hydroxide is unstable, so the product is the metal oxide (for example Al2O3Al_2O_3, Fe3O4Fe_3O_4).
  • Dropping the reversible arrow for iron with steam — it is the one water reaction in this chapter that goes both ways, and exams specifically test it.
  • Forgetting to convert mass to moles before applying the mole ratio from the equation, or using the wrong ratio (it is moles of metal to moles of H2H_2, not metal to H2OH_2O).

Ask the tutor: Want to try predicting the products and states needed for a few more metals, or practise a stoichiometry question on hydrogen volume?

Why does sodium float and catch fire on water while calcium just fizzes

Sodium is less dense than water and reacts so fast that the heat released can melt the unreacted sodium into a ball and ignite the hydrogen gas around it, especially if the metal moves or the water is disturbed. Calcium is denser and reacts more slowly and steadily, so the heat spreads out rather than concentrating in one spot, giving gentle, continuous effervescence rather than a flame. Both reactions are exothermic; the difference is how fast the energy is released and how easily the hydrogen collects near a hot spot.

Why does magnesium need hot water when it does react with cold dilute acids

Acids and water are different oxygen sources for magnesium to displace hydrogen from, and magnesium's reactivity is not identical against every source. Water molecules hold their hydrogen more tightly than the hydrogen ions already free-floating in a dilute acid, so magnesium needs the extra thermal energy of hot water to break the bond, whereas the acid hands it a hydrogen ion that is comparatively easy to pick up even in the cold. This is a syllabus-stated exception to remember rather than something to over-generalise from.

Does the reversibility of the iron and steam reaction mean it never actually produces hydrogen

No — reversible only means both directions are possible under the same conditions, not that they are equally likely at every moment. If steam is kept flowing past red-hot iron and the hydrogen produced is carried away, the forward reaction (iron plus steam giving iron oxide and hydrogen) dominates and hydrogen keeps being generated. If hydrogen is instead allowed to build up and steam supply is cut off, the reverse reaction becomes significant and iron oxide is reduced back to iron. Which way the reaction leans depends on which gas is kept in excess.

Before this

Where this leads