Logarithms

A logarithm answers one question: to what power must this base be raised to get this number? It is nothing more than another way of writing an index (exponent) statement — ax=Na^x=N and log⁡aN=x\log_a N=x are the same fact, read in two directions. This section is the final strand of the ICSE Class 9 Algebra chapter, building directly on indices you already know. The syllabus asks you to move fluently between logarithmic form and exponential form, and to use three laws — product, quotient, power — to expand expressions such as y=a4b2c3y=\dfrac{a^4b^2}{c^3} into a sum of simpler logs. It stops there: proving the laws from scratch, changing base, or solving logarithmic equations are beyond Class 9. This article stays inside that boundary while giving you the "why" behind each law, so the rules never feel arbitrary.

The core insight

A logarithm is just the index in ax=Na^x=N written the other way round as log⁡aN=x\log_a N=x, and because it is an index, every logarithm law is really a law of indices in disguise.

The core idea

Two forms, one fact. The exponential form and the logarithmic form describe the same relationship between a base, an index, and a result:

ax=N⟺log⁡aN=x(a>0, a≠1, N>0)a^x=N \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \log_a N = x \qquad (a>0,\ a\neq1,\ N>0)

where: aa is the base, xx is the index (the power), and NN is the result. Read log⁡aN=x\log_a N=x as "the power to which aa must be raised to give NN is xx." The condition a>0, a≠1a>0,\ a\neq1 keeps the base sensible (a base of 11 or a negative base breaks the pattern), and N>0N>0 because a positive base raised to any real power stays positive.

Three laws, one source. Since a logarithm is an index, the three laws of indices translate directly into three laws of logarithms:

log⁡a(MN)=log⁡aM+log⁡aN(product law)\log_a(MN)=\log_a M+\log_a N \qquad \text{(product law)}
log⁡a(MN)=log⁡aM−log⁡aN(quotient law)\log_a\left(\frac{M}{N}\right)=\log_a M-\log_a N \qquad \text{(quotient law)}
log⁡a(Mk)=klog⁡aM(power law)\log_a(M^k)=k\log_a M \qquad \text{(power law)}

where: MM and NN are positive numbers, and kk is any real index. The product law turns multiplication inside a log into addition outside it; the quotient law turns division into subtraction; the power law brings an exponent down as a multiplying coefficient.

Two anchor values. Two further results follow straight from the definition and are worth memorising cold:

log⁡aa=1,log⁡a1=0\log_a a = 1, \qquad \log_a 1 = 0

log⁡aa=1\log_a a=1 because a1=aa^1=a; log⁡a1=0\log_a 1=0 because a0=1a^0=1 for any valid base aa.

Figure
A number line style diagram matching exponential form and logarithmic form for the same base and index
Exponential form and logarithmic form say the same thing 5³ = 125 base 5, index 3, result 125 log₅ 125 = 3 power to which 5 is raised to give 125 Same base, same index, same result — only the way of writing it changes. A logarithm is the index in exponential form, isolated and given a name.

Why the laws work

The three logarithm laws are not separate facts to memorise; each one is a direct translation of the corresponding law of indices, because log⁡aN\log_a N is, by definition, the index to which aa must be raised to produce NN.

Step 1. Let M=axM=a^x and N=ayN=a^y for some base aa, so that by definition log⁡aM=x\log_a M=x and log⁡aN=y\log_a N=y — this is just restating what the two logarithms mean as indices.

Step 2. Multiply MM and NN using the multiplication law of indices, ax×ay=ax+ya^x\times a^y=a^{x+y}, so that MN=ax+yMN=a^{x+y}; converting this back to logarithmic form gives log⁡a(MN)=x+y\log_a(MN)=x+y, and substituting x=log⁡aMx=\log_a M, y=log⁡aNy=\log_a N gives the product law log⁡a(MN)=log⁡aM+log⁡aN\log_a(MN)=\log_a M+\log_a N.

Step 3. Divide instead of multiply: the division law of indices gives MN=axay=ax−y\dfrac{M}{N}=\dfrac{a^x}{a^y}=a^{x-y}, so log⁡a ⁣(MN)=x−y=log⁡aM−log⁡aN\log_a\!\left(\dfrac{M}{N}\right)=x-y=\log_a M-\log_a N, which is the quotient law.

Step 4. Raise M=axM=a^x to a power kk: the power law of indices gives Mk=(ax)k=axkM^k=(a^x)^k=a^{xk}, so log⁡a(Mk)=xk=klog⁡aM\log_a(M^k)=xk=k\log_a M, which is the power law. All three logarithm laws therefore come from the same three laws of indices you already know — nothing new is being assumed, only restated in logarithmic language.

Worked example

If y=p3qr2y=\dfrac{p^3\sqrt{q}}{r^2}, express log⁡y\log y in terms of log⁡p\log p, log⁡q\log q, and log⁡r\log r; then use log⁡5125=3\log_5 125=3 to check the definition still holds for a numerical case.

Step 1. Rewrite the square root as a fractional index, so the power law can be applied cleanly later:

y=p3q1/2r2y=\frac{p^3 q^{1/2}}{r^2}

Step 2. Apply the quotient law to split the fraction into a difference of two logarithms:

log⁡y=log⁡(p3q1/2)−log⁡(r2)\log y = \log(p^3q^{1/2}) - \log(r^2)

Step 3. Apply the product law to the first term, separating the product p3q1/2p^3q^{1/2}:

log⁡y=log⁡(p3)+log⁡(q1/2)−log⁡(r2)\log y = \log(p^3)+\log(q^{1/2})-\log(r^2)

Step 4. Apply the power law to bring each index down as a coefficient:

log⁡y=3log⁡p+12log⁡q−2log⁡r\log y = 3\log p+\tfrac{1}{2}\log q-2\log r

So log⁡y=3log⁡p+12log⁡q−2log⁡r\boxed{\log y = 3\log p+\dfrac{1}{2}\log q-2\log r}.

Competitive stretch

The same definition handles pure numbers directly, without any expansion. Since 53=1255^3=125, the equivalence ax=N⇔log⁡aN=xa^x=N\Leftrightarrow\log_a N=x gives log⁡5125=3\log_5 125=3 immediately — check: 5×5×5=1255\times5\times5=125. And reversing it, log⁡232=5\log_2 32=5 converts back to 25=322^5=32, since 2×2×2×2×2=322\times2\times2\times2\times2=32. Working through worked example 2 one step at a time — quotient, then product, then power — rather than trying to expand everything in one jump, is what keeps three laws from tangling together when an expression uses all of them at once.

Reading logs as indices, not as a new topic

It helps to stop thinking of "logarithms" as a brand-new mathematical object and instead see them as a change of viewpoint on something you already know: indices. Every statement you can write with an exponent has a matching statement you can write with a logarithm, and vice versa. When a question gives you y=a4b2c3y=\dfrac{a^4b^2}{c^3} and asks for log⁡y\log y, it is really asking you to track what happens to each factor's index as the product, quotient, and power laws peel the expression apart — the logarithm notation is just bookkeeping for those indices once they are written as coefficients. This viewpoint also explains why the syllabus stops where it does. Class 9 asks you to expand and simplify, never to solve equations like log⁡2x=5\log_2 x=5 for a variable buried inside a more complex expression, and never to change between different bases. Both of those skills need extra machinery — solving needs you to treat the logarithm as an invertible function, and changing base needs a formula that is not part of this chapter. Staying disciplined about scope means you will not lose marks trying to prove the laws from scratch in an exam that only asks you to apply them.

Common traps

  • Confusing log⁡a(MN)\log_a(MN) with log⁡aM×log⁡aN\log_a M\times\log_a N — the product law converts multiplication inside the log into addition outside it, never multiplication.
  • Writing log⁡a(M+N)\log_a(M+N) as log⁡aM+log⁡aN\log_a M+\log_a N — there is no law for the log of a sum; the three laws apply only to products, quotients, and powers.
  • Forgetting to convert a root like q\sqrt{q} into the fractional index q1/2q^{1/2} before applying the power law, and leaving it un-expanded instead.
  • Mixing up log⁡aa=1\log_a a=1 with log⁡a1=0\log_a 1=0 under exam pressure — anchor them to a1=aa^1=a and a0=1a^0=1 respectively rather than memorising them as bare facts.
  • Trying to apply the quotient law to log⁡a(M−N)\log_a(M-N), treating subtraction inside a log the same as division — the quotient law needs a genuine fraction M/NM/N, not a difference.

Ask the tutor: Want to practice expanding a messier expression like log⁡(a4b2c3)\log\left(\dfrac{a^4b^2}{c^3}\right) or convert a batch of exponential statements into log form — ask your AI tutor to walk through a few with you, step by step.

Why does log base a of 1 always equal 0, no matter what a is

Because any nonzero base raised to the power zero gives 11 — that is a0=1a^0=1 for every valid base a>0, a≠1a>0,\ a\neq1. Converting a0=1a^0=1 into logarithmic form using ax=N⇔log⁡aN=xa^x=N\Leftrightarrow\log_a N=x gives log⁡a1=0\log_a 1=0 directly. It is a definition-level fact, not something to verify with a calculator, so you can use it instantly whenever a 11 appears inside a logarithm.

Can I use the quotient law on log of (x minus 3) if the expression is written as a fraction later

No — the quotient law only applies when the argument of the logarithm is genuinely a ratio, like log⁡a(M/N)\log_a(M/N). An expression like log⁡(x−3)\log(x-3) has a difference inside it, not a fraction, so none of the three laws can split it further. Logs of sums or differences simply cannot be expanded; they stay as a single term unless the problem itself gives you more structure (for example, if x−3x-3 factorises into a product).

Is there a quick way to remember which law goes with which operation

Yes: read the law names against what happens inside the log. Product law: multiplication inside becomes addition outside. Quotient law: division inside becomes subtraction outside. Power law: an exponent inside comes down as a multiplying coefficient outside. In each case the operation "drops one level" — multiplication becomes addition, an exponent becomes a coefficient — which is also why remembering the index laws first makes the logarithm laws almost automatic.

Before this

Where this leads