Shear-force and bending-moment diagrams

A beam bends and eventually breaks not because of the loads sitting on it, but because of the internal forces those loads set up at every cross-section along its length. Cut a beam anywhere and the two halves must still balance each other: the piece you removed pulled with a transverse shear force V(x)V(x) and twisted with a bending moment M(x)M(x). Plot these two quantities against position xx and you get the shear-force diagram (SFD) and bending-moment diagram (BMD) — the two graphs every beam designer draws before choosing a cross-section. The peak values read straight off these curves fix where the beam is closest to failing in shear and in bending, and by how much, which is exactly what the flexure and shear-stress formulas later in this chapter need as input.

The core insight

Sweeping a beam left to right, shear jumps by concentrated forces and follows dV/dx=−w(x)dV/dx = -w(x) between them, while moment jumps by applied couples and follows dM/dx=V(x)dM/dx = V(x) — so the moment diagram is literally the running area under the shear diagram.

The core idea

Reactions first. Before any internal force can be found, treat the whole beam as one free body and solve ∑Fy=0\sum F_y = 0 and ∑M=0\sum M = 0 for the support reactions. Every later step is checked against these numbers.

Pick a sign convention and stick to it. The standard choice: VV is positive if the net transverse force to the left of a section acts upward; MM is positive if it produces sagging — concave up, tension in the bottom fibre. Getting this backwards flips every diagram you draw.

The two governing relations. Between concentrated loads and couples, shear and moment vary smoothly according to

dVdx=−w(x),dMdx=V(x)\frac{dV}{dx} = -w(x), \qquad \frac{dM}{dx} = V(x)

where: w(x)w(x) is the distributed load intensity (force per length, positive downward), V(x)V(x) is the shear force at position xx, and M(x)M(x) is the bending moment at position xx. The first equation says shear falls at a rate equal to the local load; the second says moment rises at a rate equal to the local shear, so MM is literally the area swept under the VV diagram. At a concentrated force PP, VV jumps by ∓P\mp P; at a concentrated couple, MM jumps by its magnitude.

Reading the shapes. No load between two points means VV is constant and MM is a straight line. Uniform load means VV is a straight line (slope −w-w) and MM is a parabola. A triangular load makes VV parabolic and MM cubic. Recognizing these shapes on sight is faster than re-deriving them each time.

Critical points. The bending moment is a maximum (in magnitude) wherever V=0V = 0, because that is where the slope of the MM curve vanishes — this is where a beam is most likely to fail in bending and is the point every design check starts from.

Figure
Shear force and bending moment diagrams for a simply supported beam with a central point load
Simply supported beam, central point load P P A B V +10 kN -10 kN M 40 kN·m peak at V = 0
Derivation ABending moment as the running area of the shear diagram

The goal is to show, from equilibrium of a thin beam slice alone, that the moment gradient equals the shear force and the shear gradient equals minus the load intensity — the two relations that let you sketch a bending-moment diagram directly from a shear diagram without integrating anything from scratch each time.

Step 1. Isolate a thin slice of beam of length Δx\Delta x carrying distributed load w(x)w(x) downward, with shear VV and moment MM on the left face and V+ΔVV + \Delta V, M+ΔMM + \Delta M on the right face. Vertical equilibrium of the slice gives V−(V+ΔV)−w Δx=0V - (V + \Delta V) - w\,\Delta x = 0, so ΔV=−w Δx\Delta V = -w\,\Delta x.

Step 2. Divide by Δx\Delta x and let Δx→0\Delta x \to 0: ΔVΔx→dVdx=−w(x)\dfrac{\Delta V}{\Delta x} \to \dfrac{dV}{dx} = -w(x). This is the shear-slope rule: the shear diagram falls at a rate set by the local load intensity, and is flat wherever there is no distributed load.

Step 3. Take moments about the right face of the same slice, dropping the second-order term w Δx⋅Δx/2w\,\Delta x \cdot \Delta x/2: −M+(M+ΔM)−V Δx=0-M + (M + \Delta M) - V\,\Delta x = 0, so ΔM=V Δx\Delta M = V\,\Delta x.

Step 4. Divide by Δx\Delta x and let Δx→0\Delta x \to 0: dMdx=V(x)\dfrac{dM}{dx} = V(x). Integrating both sides between two sections shows M2−M1=∫V dxM_2 - M_1 = \int V\,dx, the area under the shear diagram between them — which is exactly why you can sketch the BMD by accumulating the SFD region by region instead of re-deriving M(x)M(x) from scratch at every point.

Worked example

A simply supported beam ABAB, span L=8 mL = 8\ \text{m}, carries a single concentrated load P=20 kNP = 20\ \text{kN} at midspan (4 m4\ \text{m} from AA). Draw the SFD and BMD and state the peak shear and moment.

Step 1. Reactions from overall equilibrium: by symmetry, RA=RB=P/2=10 kNR_A = R_B = P/2 = 10\ \text{kN}.

Step 2. Shear diagram: from AA to just before the load, V=+RA=10 kNV = +R_A = 10\ \text{kN} (constant, no distributed load). At x=4 mx = 4\ \text{m}, VV jumps down by P=20 kNP = 20\ \text{kN}, giving V=10−20=−10 kNV = 10 - 20 = -10\ \text{kN}, which stays constant to BB — consistent with RB=10 kNR_B = 10\ \text{kN}.

Step 3. Moment diagram: M(0)=0M(0) = 0, then MM rises linearly with slope V=10 kNV = 10\ \text{kN} (using dM/dx=VdM/dx = V) up to x=4 mx = 4\ \text{m}:

M(4)=RA×4=10×4=40 kN ⋅ mM(4) = R_A \times 4 = 10 \times 4 = 40\ \text{kN}\,\cdot\,\text{m}

From x=4x = 4 to x=8x = 8, MM falls linearly with slope V=−10 kNV = -10\ \text{kN}, returning to M(8)=0M(8) = 0 as required at the pin support BB.

Step 4. Peak values: Vmax=±10 kNV_{max} = \pm 10\ \text{kN} everywhere except the point load, and Mmax=40 kN ⋅ mM_{max} = 40\ \text{kN}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at midspan, exactly where VV changes sign. Answer: Vmax=±10 kNV_{max} = \pm 10\ \text{kN}, Mmax=40 kN ⋅ mM_{max} = 40\ \text{kN}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at midspan.

Competitive stretch

A cantilever ABAB, length L=4 mL = 4\ \text{m}, fixed at AA, carries a uniformly distributed load w=5 kN/mw = 5\ \text{kN/m} over its whole length. Taking xx from the free end BB, the shear at a section a distance xx from the free end equals the load carried outboard of it: V(x)=−wxV(x) = -wx, linear, reaching V(4)=−20 kNV(4) = -20\ \text{kN} at the fixed end. Integrating with dM/dx=VdM/dx = V gives M(x)=−wx2/2M(x) = -wx^2/2, a downward-opening parabola reaching M(4)=−(5)(16)/2=−40 kN ⋅ mM(4) = -(5)(16)/2 = -40\ \text{kN}\,\cdot\,\text{m} at the fixed support, matching the reactive moment MA=−(wL)(L/2)=−40 kN ⋅ mM_A = -(wL)(L/2) = -40\ \text{kN}\,\cdot\,\text{m} found from overall equilibrium of the fixed end. The distributed-load SFD is a straight line and its BMD is genuinely curved — a common place students wrongly sketch a straight moment diagram instead.

Common traps

  • Sketching the BMD as straight lines under a distributed load, when dM/dx=VdM/dx = V forces it to be curved — parabolic under uniform load, cubic under triangular load.
  • Forgetting that the moment must return to zero at any free end or simple/pin support; a nonzero value there flags an arithmetic or reaction error.
  • Missing the reactive moment at a fixed support under distributed or offset load — a cantilever needs both a force reaction and a moment reaction.
  • Assuming the maximum moment sits at midspan or at a support by habit, instead of locating it properly at V=0V = 0.

Ask the tutor: If you are stuck sketching an SFD/BMD for a beam mixing point loads, distributed loads, and an applied couple, ask the AI tutor to build it region by region with you.

Why does the moment diagram jump at a couple but the shear diagram does not?

A concentrated couple applies pure rotation, not a net transverse force, so vertical equilibrium of a thin slice at that section is unaffected and VV stays continuous. But moment equilibrium of the same slice must now balance the applied couple directly, so MM jumps by its magnitude right there. Concentrated forces do the opposite: they jump VV but leave MM continuous, since a point force takes zero distance to act, so the area added to the moment diagram at that instant is zero.

Do I have to use the method of sections every time, or can I just use the slope rules?

Once you trust dV/dx=−w(x)dV/dx = -w(x) and dM/dx=V(x)dM/dx = V(x), you rarely need to cut a fresh section at every point. Find the reactions, sketch VV region by region using the jump-and-slope rules, then build MM as the running area under VV. The method of sections is still worth doing once per beam as a spot check, especially at the point where V=0V = 0, to confirm your peak moment value.

How do I know if a bending moment is positive or negative just by looking at the beam?

Use the sagging convention: if the loading makes the beam curve concave up, like a smile, with tension in the bottom fibres, the moment is positive there. A simply supported beam under downward loads sags, so its moment diagram is positive throughout. A cantilever under a downward load hogs near the fixed end, concave down with tension on top, which is why its moment came out negative in the worked cantilever example.

Before this

Where this leads