Ionisation and dilution law

Dissolve acetic acid in water and something curious happens: only a small fraction of the molecules split into ions, and that fraction is not fixed — it grows as you add more water. Strong electrolytes like HCl\text{HCl} ionise almost completely no matter what; weak electrolytes like CH3COOH\text{CH}_3\text{COOH} settle into a genuine dynamic equilibrium between molecules and ions, and how far that equilibrium tips depends on concentration. Ostwald's dilution law is the equation that captures this precisely. It connects the degree of ionisation α\alpha (the fraction of molecules ionised) to the fixed ionisation constant KaK_a and the changeable concentration cc, and it explains — quantitatively, not just qualitatively — why diluting a weak acid or base makes it ionise more. This article derives the law from a simple ICE table, applies it to acetic acid at two different concentrations, and flags the exact conditions under which the popular shortcut formula α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c} is safe to use.

The core insight

For a weak electrolyte at concentration cc with ionisation constant KaK_a, the degree of ionisation obeys Ka=cα21−α≈cα2K_a = \dfrac{c\alpha^2}{1-\alpha} \approx c\alpha^2, so α∝1/c\alpha \propto 1/\sqrt{c} and ionisation increases on dilution.

The core idea

Strong vs weak electrolytes. Strong electrolytes (HCl\text{HCl}, NaOH\text{NaOH}, NaCl\text{NaCl}) ionise almost completely at any reasonable concentration — there is no real equilibrium to speak of, just a one-way split. Weak electrolytes (CH3COOH\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}, NH4OH\text{NH}_4\text{OH}) ionise only partially: unionised molecules and ions coexist at a true dynamic equilibrium, and the balance point shifts with conditions.

Degree of ionisation. The degree of ionisation α\alpha is the fraction of the total moles of electrolyte taken that have actually ionised at equilibrium:

α=moles ionisedtotal moles taken initially\alpha = \dfrac{\text{moles ionised}}{\text{total moles taken initially}}

where: α\alpha is a pure number between 00 and 11 (often quoted as a percentage); α=0\alpha = 0 means no ionisation at all, α=1\alpha = 1 means complete ionisation.

Setting up the ICE table. For a weak monobasic acid HAHA ionising as HA⇌H++A−HA \rightleftharpoons H^+ + A^-, start with initial concentration cc (mol L−1^{-1}) of HAHA and zero for the ions. At equilibrium, a fraction α\alpha has ionised, so:

[HA]=c(1−α),[H+]=cα,[A−]=cα[HA] = c(1-\alpha), \quad [H^+] = c\alpha, \quad [A^-] = c\alpha

where: the change row of the ICE table is −cα-c\alpha for HAHA and +cα+c\alpha for each ion, so the three equilibrium concentrations here are what feed directly into the equilibrium-constant expression below.

Figure
A bar comparing degree of ionisation at two dilutions showing a short bar for the concentrated solution and a taller bar for the ten times more dilute solution
Degree of ionisation rises as concentration falls concentration c (mol per litre) degree of ionisation α 0.10 M α ≈ 0.0134 0.0010 M α ≈ 0.134 acetic acid, Ka = 1.8 times 10 to the minus 5

The equilibrium constant, dilution, and the simplification

Substituting the ICE-table concentrations into Ka=[H+][A−][HA]K_a = \dfrac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]} gives Ostwald's dilution law, derived in full below. When α\alpha is small (weak electrolytes at ordinary concentrations), the approximation 1−α≈11 - \alpha \approx 1 lets α\alpha be pulled out cleanly as α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c}. Since KaK_a is fixed at a given temperature, this shows α∝1/c\alpha \propto 1/\sqrt{c}: diluting a weak electrolyte increases its degree of ionisation, and α→1\alpha \to 1 as c→0c \to 0. Le Chatelier's principle gives the same conclusion qualitatively — diluting the solution lowers all concentrations, and the equilibrium shifts toward the side with more particles (H++A−H^+ + A^-, two particles) to partially oppose that drop, i.e. toward more ionisation. The same law applies to a weak base BOH⇌B++OH−BOH \rightleftharpoons B^+ + OH^-, with Kb≈cα2K_b \approx c\alpha^2.

Derivation AOstwald's dilution law

The goal is to derive the relation Ka=cα21−αK_a = \dfrac{c\alpha^2}{1-\alpha} that links the ionisation constant of a weak monobasic acid to its degree of ionisation and concentration, starting only from the equilibrium-constant expression and the ICE-table concentrations already set up above, and then to isolate α\alpha under the small-α\alpha approximation to get the working formula used in calculations.

Step 1. Write the equilibrium-constant expression for HA⇌H++A−HA \rightleftharpoons H^+ + A^-: Ka=[H+][A−][HA]K_a = \dfrac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}. This is just the law of mass action applied to the ionisation equilibrium, with concentrations at equilibrium (not initial concentrations).

Step 2. Substitute the ICE-table values [H+]=cα[H^+] = c\alpha, [A−]=cα[A^-] = c\alpha, [HA]=c(1−α)[HA] = c(1-\alpha): Ka=(cα)(cα)c(1−α)K_a = \dfrac{(c\alpha)(c\alpha)}{c(1-\alpha)}.

Step 3. Simplify by cancelling one factor of cc from numerator and denominator: Ka=cα21−αK_a = \dfrac{c\alpha^2}{1-\alpha}. This is Ostwald's dilution law in its exact form — a relation among three quantities (KaK_a, cc, α\alpha) where any one can be found if the other two are known.

Step 4. Apply the small-α\alpha approximation. For weak electrolytes at typical concentrations, α≪1\alpha \ll 1, so 1−α≈11 - \alpha \approx 1, giving Ka≈cα2K_a \approx c\alpha^2. Rearranging for α\alpha: α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c}. This is the formula used for quick calculation, valid whenever α\alpha stays small enough that 1−α≈11-\alpha \approx 1 is a fair approximation.

Worked example

Comparing α\alpha at two concentrations of acetic acid. Acetic acid has Ka=1.8×10−5K_a = 1.8\times10^{-5} at 298 K. Find α\alpha at c1=0.10 Mc_1 = 0.10\ M and at c2=0.0010 Mc_2 = 0.0010\ M (a 100-fold dilution), and check the relationship between them.

Step 1. At c1=0.10 Mc_1 = 0.10\ M, apply α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c}: α1≈(1.8×10−5)/0.10=1.8×10−4≈0.0134\alpha_1 \approx \sqrt{(1.8\times10^{-5})/0.10} = \sqrt{1.8\times10^{-4}} \approx 0.0134, i.e. about 1.34%1.34\% ionised.

Step 2. At c2=0.0010 Mc_2 = 0.0010\ M, the same formula gives α2≈(1.8×10−5)/0.0010=1.8×10−2≈0.134\alpha_2 \approx \sqrt{(1.8\times10^{-5})/0.0010} = \sqrt{1.8\times10^{-2}} \approx 0.134, i.e. about 13.4%13.4\% ionised.

Step 3. Compare: diluting 100-fold increased α\alpha tenfold (0.134/0.0134=10.00.134/0.0134 = 10.0), exactly matching the prediction α∝1/c\alpha \propto 1/\sqrt{c}, since 100=10\sqrt{100} = 10.

Step 4. Check the approximation at each point. At c1c_1, α1=0.0134≪1\alpha_1 = 0.0134 \ll 1, so 1−α≈0.987≈11-\alpha \approx 0.987 \approx 1 is safe. At c2c_2, α2=0.134\alpha_2 = 0.134 is over 5%5\%, so the approximation is getting shaky — a more careful answer would solve the exact quadratic Ka=cα21−αK_a = \dfrac{c\alpha^2}{1-\alpha} instead.

Final answer: α1≈0.0134\alpha_1 \approx 0.0134 (1.34%) at 0.10 M0.10\ M, and α2≈0.134\alpha_2 \approx 0.134 (13.4%) at 0.0010 M0.0010\ M — a tenfold increase in ionisation on hundredfold dilution.

Common traps

  • Applying Ostwald's dilution law to strong electrolytes — the law describes the partial, equilibrium-governed ionisation of weak electrolytes only; strong electrolytes are already almost fully ionised regardless of concentration, so there is no meaningful equilibrium for the law to describe.
  • Using α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c} without checking that α≪1\alpha \ll 1 — at low concentrations or large KaK_a, α\alpha can grow too large for 1−α≈11-\alpha \approx 1 to hold, and the exact quadratic form is needed instead; skipping this check is the single most common source of a wrong final answer.
  • Confusing KaK_a with α\alpha — KaK_a is constant at a given temperature and depends only on the identity of the acid; α\alpha changes with concentration, increasing as the solution is diluted, even though KaK_a itself never moves.
  • Assuming ion concentration rises with dilution — α\alpha rises, but the absolute ion concentration cαc\alpha typically still falls overall as cc drops sharply; a bigger fraction of a much smaller total can still be a smaller number.
  • Forgetting that α\alpha depends on temperature only through KaK_a — at a fixed temperature, changing the volume of solvent (dilution) is the only lever that moves α\alpha for a given electrolyte; changing KaK_a itself requires changing the temperature.

Ask the tutor: Want to see how this degree of ionisation feeds directly into a pH calculation for a weak acid, or how the common-ion effect works against dilution's push on α\alpha?

Why does dilution increase the degree of ionisation instead of decreasing it?

It feels backwards at first, but Le Chatelier's principle explains it. Diluting the solution lowers the concentration of every species present. The ionisation equilibrium HA⇌H++A−HA \rightleftharpoons H^+ + A^- has more particles on the product side (two ions) than the reactant side (one molecule), so the system shifts toward products to partially resist the drop in concentration — meaning more ionisation. The math agrees: α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c} shows α\alpha grows as cc shrinks.

Why is the approximate formula sometimes wrong, and how do I know when to trust it?

The formula α≈Ka/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_a/c} comes from dropping α\alpha out of the denominator term 1−α1-\alpha, which is only fair when α\alpha is small (roughly under 5%). Check this after calculating: if your computed α\alpha turns out to be much less than 1, the approximation was justified. If it comes out large — say above 0.1 — you should instead solve the exact quadratic cα2+Kaα−Ka=0c\alpha^2 + K_a\alpha - K_a = 0 for α\alpha using the quadratic formula.

Does Ostwald's dilution law work for weak bases too?

Yes, by exactly the same reasoning. For a weak base BOH⇌B++OH−BOH \rightleftharpoons B^+ + OH^-, setting up the same ICE table with base dissociation constant KbK_b gives Kb=cα21−αK_b = \dfrac{c\alpha^2}{1-\alpha}, simplifying to Kb≈cα2K_b \approx c\alpha^2 and α≈Kb/c\alpha \approx \sqrt{K_b/c} under the same small-α\alpha condition. The derivation is identical; only the labels H+→B+H^+ \to B^+ and A−→OH−A^- \to OH^- change, and the acid constant KaK_a becomes the base constant KbK_b.

Before this

Where this leads