Ionisation and dilution law
Dissolve acetic acid in water and something curious happens: only a small fraction of the molecules split into ions, and that fraction is not fixed — it grows as you add more water. Strong electrolytes like ionise almost completely no matter what; weak electrolytes like settle into a genuine dynamic equilibrium between molecules and ions, and how far that equilibrium tips depends on concentration. Ostwald's dilution law is the equation that captures this precisely. It connects the degree of ionisation (the fraction of molecules ionised) to the fixed ionisation constant and the changeable concentration , and it explains — quantitatively, not just qualitatively — why diluting a weak acid or base makes it ionise more. This article derives the law from a simple ICE table, applies it to acetic acid at two different concentrations, and flags the exact conditions under which the popular shortcut formula is safe to use.
For a weak electrolyte at concentration with ionisation constant , the degree of ionisation obeys , so and ionisation increases on dilution.
The core idea
Strong vs weak electrolytes. Strong electrolytes (, , ) ionise almost completely at any reasonable concentration — there is no real equilibrium to speak of, just a one-way split. Weak electrolytes (, ) ionise only partially: unionised molecules and ions coexist at a true dynamic equilibrium, and the balance point shifts with conditions.
Degree of ionisation. The degree of ionisation is the fraction of the total moles of electrolyte taken that have actually ionised at equilibrium:
where: is a pure number between and (often quoted as a percentage); means no ionisation at all, means complete ionisation.
Setting up the ICE table. For a weak monobasic acid ionising as , start with initial concentration (mol L) of and zero for the ions. At equilibrium, a fraction has ionised, so:
where: the change row of the ICE table is for and for each ion, so the three equilibrium concentrations here are what feed directly into the equilibrium-constant expression below.
The equilibrium constant, dilution, and the simplification
Substituting the ICE-table concentrations into gives Ostwald's dilution law, derived in full below. When is small (weak electrolytes at ordinary concentrations), the approximation lets be pulled out cleanly as . Since is fixed at a given temperature, this shows : diluting a weak electrolyte increases its degree of ionisation, and as . Le Chatelier's principle gives the same conclusion qualitatively — diluting the solution lowers all concentrations, and the equilibrium shifts toward the side with more particles (, two particles) to partially oppose that drop, i.e. toward more ionisation. The same law applies to a weak base , with .
The goal is to derive the relation that links the ionisation constant of a weak monobasic acid to its degree of ionisation and concentration, starting only from the equilibrium-constant expression and the ICE-table concentrations already set up above, and then to isolate under the small- approximation to get the working formula used in calculations.
Step 1. Write the equilibrium-constant expression for : . This is just the law of mass action applied to the ionisation equilibrium, with concentrations at equilibrium (not initial concentrations).
Step 2. Substitute the ICE-table values , , : .
Step 3. Simplify by cancelling one factor of from numerator and denominator: . This is Ostwald's dilution law in its exact form — a relation among three quantities (, , ) where any one can be found if the other two are known.
Step 4. Apply the small- approximation. For weak electrolytes at typical concentrations, , so , giving . Rearranging for : . This is the formula used for quick calculation, valid whenever stays small enough that is a fair approximation.
Worked example
Comparing at two concentrations of acetic acid. Acetic acid has at 298 K. Find at and at (a 100-fold dilution), and check the relationship between them.
Step 1. At , apply : , i.e. about ionised.
Step 2. At , the same formula gives , i.e. about ionised.
Step 3. Compare: diluting 100-fold increased tenfold (), exactly matching the prediction , since .
Step 4. Check the approximation at each point. At , , so is safe. At , is over , so the approximation is getting shaky — a more careful answer would solve the exact quadratic instead.
Final answer: (1.34%) at , and (13.4%) at — a tenfold increase in ionisation on hundredfold dilution.
Common traps
- Applying Ostwald's dilution law to strong electrolytes — the law describes the partial, equilibrium-governed ionisation of weak electrolytes only; strong electrolytes are already almost fully ionised regardless of concentration, so there is no meaningful equilibrium for the law to describe.
- Using without checking that — at low concentrations or large , can grow too large for to hold, and the exact quadratic form is needed instead; skipping this check is the single most common source of a wrong final answer.
- Confusing with — is constant at a given temperature and depends only on the identity of the acid; changes with concentration, increasing as the solution is diluted, even though itself never moves.
- Assuming ion concentration rises with dilution — rises, but the absolute ion concentration typically still falls overall as drops sharply; a bigger fraction of a much smaller total can still be a smaller number.
- Forgetting that depends on temperature only through — at a fixed temperature, changing the volume of solvent (dilution) is the only lever that moves for a given electrolyte; changing itself requires changing the temperature.
Ask the tutor: Want to see how this degree of ionisation feeds directly into a pH calculation for a weak acid, or how the common-ion effect works against dilution's push on ?
Why does dilution increase the degree of ionisation instead of decreasing it?
It feels backwards at first, but Le Chatelier's principle explains it. Diluting the solution lowers the concentration of every species present. The ionisation equilibrium has more particles on the product side (two ions) than the reactant side (one molecule), so the system shifts toward products to partially resist the drop in concentration — meaning more ionisation. The math agrees: shows grows as shrinks.
Why is the approximate formula sometimes wrong, and how do I know when to trust it?
The formula comes from dropping out of the denominator term , which is only fair when is small (roughly under 5%). Check this after calculating: if your computed turns out to be much less than 1, the approximation was justified. If it comes out large — say above 0.1 — you should instead solve the exact quadratic for using the quadratic formula.
Does Ostwald's dilution law work for weak bases too?
Yes, by exactly the same reasoning. For a weak base , setting up the same ICE table with base dissociation constant gives , simplifying to and under the same small- condition. The derivation is identical; only the labels and change, and the acid constant becomes the base constant .