Types of enthalpy
Burn a mole of propane and it releases over two thousand kilojoules; break a mole of methane into gaseous atoms and it absorbs over sixteen hundred. Both numbers are enthalpy changes, yet chemists never just say "the enthalpy changed" — they name the type: combustion, formation, atomisation, bond dissociation, a phase change, an ionisation, a solution. The name tells you the process, the expected sign, and how the number was measured, long before you see the value. This article builds on enthalpy as a state function, , and on the constant-pressure identity already met in thermodynamics. Here we sort reaction enthalpies into their standard named categories, connect to through the gas-mole correction , and work the same propane and methane numbers a Class 11 exam expects you to reproduce.
Every reaction enthalpy is labelled by what physical change it represents — combustion, formation, atomisation, bond dissociation, a phase change, ionisation, solution or dilution — because the label fixes both the expected sign and how relates to the measured via .
The core idea
Enthalpy is the state function , where is internal energy, is pressure and is volume. At constant pressure — the usual laboratory condition, open to the atmosphere — the enthalpy change of a process equals the heat exchanged with the surroundings:
where: is the heat absorbed (positive) or released (negative) at constant pressure. This single line is why , not , is the number quoted for almost every everyday reaction. For reactions involving gases, and differ by a small correction:
where: is (moles of gaseous products) minus (moles of gaseous reactants), is the gas constant, and is the absolute temperature. Standard values are quoted at 1 bar and usually 298 K, written .
The named types, each tied to a specific defining process:
- Enthalpy of combustion (): 1 mole of a substance burnt completely in excess oxygen. Always exothermic.
- Enthalpy of formation (): 1 mole of a compound formed from its elements in their standard states. of an element in its most stable form is defined as zero.
- Enthalpy of atomisation (): 1 mole of a substance broken completely into gaseous atoms. Always endothermic.
- Bond dissociation enthalpy: 1 mole of a specific covalent bond broken in the gas phase. Always endothermic.
- Enthalpy of sublimation / fusion / vaporisation: solid to vapour directly, solid to liquid at the melting point, or liquid to gas at the boiling point, all for 1 mole. All endothermic.
- Enthalpy of ionisation: removing an electron from 1 mole of gaseous atoms or ions. Endothermic.
- Enthalpy of solution (): 1 mole of solute dissolving in a specified or excess solvent; sign depends on the balance between lattice enthalpy (energy to separate the solid) and hydration/solvation enthalpy (energy released as ions or molecules are surrounded by solvent).
- Enthalpy of dilution: the further heat change when an already-formed solution is diluted with more solvent.
Calorimetry provides the experimental link: a bomb calorimeter runs at constant volume, so it measures directly (typical for combustion), while a constant-pressure calorimeter measures . Only this qualitative distinction is needed, not instrument design.
The goal is to show, starting only from the definition and the constant-pressure condition, exactly why and for a reaction differ by the single correction term , and why that term counts only gaseous species — this is the identity used to convert a calorimeter's into the standard quoted for a reaction such as combustion.
Step 1. Start from the definition of enthalpy, , and take the change for a reaction at constant pressure: . Because pressure is fixed at , this becomes , where is the total volume change of the system, products minus reactants.
Step 2. Split into a solid/liquid part and a gas part. Solids and liquids occupy negligible, near-constant volume compared with gases, so essentially all of comes from the change in the number of moles of gas, .
Step 3. Treat the gaseous species as ideal, so for the gas phase at fixed and . The volume change contributed by gases is then , so that .
Step 4. Substitute back into Step 1 to get , with = (moles of gaseous products) − (moles of gaseous reactants). If a reaction has no change in gas moles (), and are equal; if gas moles increase, exceeds ; if gas moles decrease, is smaller in magnitude than the exothermic (less negative), matching the correction applied in the worked example below.
Worked example
For , at 298 K. Find for the combustion of propane, then use it to classify the reaction and check the size of the correction against the total.
Step 1. Identify gaseous species only — water here is liquid, so it is excluded from the gas count. Gaseous products: . Gaseous reactants: moles of gas.
Step 2. Compute = (gaseous products) − (gaseous reactants) .
Step 3. Apply with and : .
Step 4. Add the correction: . This is the standard enthalpy of combustion of propane, and it is exothermic, as combustion always is. The correction is only about of the total, because it moves relatively few gas moles compared with the huge bond-energy change of complete combustion. .
Competitive stretch
Given the enthalpy of atomisation of is , find the average C–H bond dissociation enthalpy, and separately classify at 373 K.
Step 1. Atomisation of methane, , breaks all 4 equivalent C–H bonds, so the average bond dissociation enthalpy per bond is . This is an average — the four real stepwise bond enthalpies in are not identical to each other.
Step 2. For , heat must be supplied to overcome hydrogen bonding and convert liquid to vapour, so : the process is endothermic, and since it occurs at the boiling point it is the enthalpy of vaporisation, .
Common traps
- Forgetting the sign convention in — count only gaseous species, and take products minus reactants, not the other way round.
- Assuming every enthalpy of formation is exothermic — many are not; formation of from and has a positive .
- Confusing enthalpy of solution with enthalpy of dilution — solution is dissolving in fresh or excess solvent, dilution is the extra heat change on adding more solvent to a solution that already exists.
- Treating tabulated bond dissociation enthalpies for molecules with several identical bonds (like the four C–H bonds in methane) as exact stepwise values rather than averages.
Ask the tutor: If you are unsure which named enthalpy applies to a given process, or how to find from a balanced equation, ask the AI tutor for a quick drill matching definitions to examples.
Why is delta H usually quoted instead of delta U if they are so close in value
Because almost every real reaction happens open to the atmosphere, at constant pressure, not constant volume. Under those everyday conditions is exactly the heat you can measure with a simple calorimeter, so it is the natural quantity to report. matters mainly when a reaction is deliberately run at constant volume, as in a bomb calorimeter, and even then chemists usually convert the result to using so it can be compared with other tabulated values.
Why are bond dissociation enthalpy and atomisation enthalpy always positive
Both describe breaking bonds to separate a substance into individual gaseous atoms, and breaking any chemical bond requires an input of energy to overcome the attraction holding the atoms together — there is no way to do this and release net energy. The reverse process, atoms combining to form bonds, is always exothermic, which is consistent with formation enthalpies of stable compounds usually being negative. So endothermic bond-breaking and exothermic bond-making are two faces of the same energy diagram.
How do I know whether enthalpy of solution will be exothermic or endothermic for a given salt
It depends on which is larger in magnitude: the lattice enthalpy (energy needed to pull the solid's ions apart) or the hydration enthalpy (energy released as those ions become surrounded by solvent molecules). If hydration releases more energy than the lattice absorbed, dissolving is exothermic overall; if the lattice enthalpy dominates, dissolving is endothermic. At Class 11 level you are usually given both values and asked to add them, rather than predicting the sign from first principles.