Types of enthalpy

Burn a mole of propane and it releases over two thousand kilojoules; break a mole of methane into gaseous atoms and it absorbs over sixteen hundred. Both numbers are enthalpy changes, yet chemists never just say "the enthalpy changed" — they name the type: combustion, formation, atomisation, bond dissociation, a phase change, an ionisation, a solution. The name tells you the process, the expected sign, and how the number was measured, long before you see the value. This article builds on enthalpy as a state function, H=U+PVH = U + PV, and on the constant-pressure identity ΔH=qp\Delta H = q_p already met in thermodynamics. Here we sort reaction enthalpies into their standard named categories, connect ΔH\Delta H to ΔU\Delta U through the gas-mole correction ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT, and work the same propane and methane numbers a Class 11 exam expects you to reproduce.

The core insight

Every reaction enthalpy is labelled by what physical change it represents — combustion, formation, atomisation, bond dissociation, a phase change, ionisation, solution or dilution — because the label fixes both the expected sign and how ΔH\Delta H relates to the measured ΔU\Delta U via ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT.

The core idea

Enthalpy HH is the state function H=U+PVH = U + PV, where UU is internal energy, PP is pressure and VV is volume. At constant pressure — the usual laboratory condition, open to the atmosphere — the enthalpy change of a process equals the heat exchanged with the surroundings:

ΔH=qp\Delta H = q_p

where: qpq_p is the heat absorbed (positive) or released (negative) at constant pressure. This single line is why ΔH\Delta H, not ΔU\Delta U, is the number quoted for almost every everyday reaction. For reactions involving gases, ΔH\Delta H and ΔU\Delta U differ by a small correction:

ΔH=ΔU+Δng RT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g\,RT

where: Δng\Delta n_g is (moles of gaseous products) minus (moles of gaseous reactants), R=8.314 J K−1mol−1R = 8.314\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1} is the gas constant, and TT is the absolute temperature. Standard values are quoted at 1 bar and usually 298 K, written ΔH∘\Delta H^\circ.

The named types, each tied to a specific defining process:

  • Enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH\Delta_c H): 1 mole of a substance burnt completely in excess oxygen. Always exothermic.
  • Enthalpy of formation (ΔfH\Delta_f H): 1 mole of a compound formed from its elements in their standard states. ΔfH∘\Delta_f H^\circ of an element in its most stable form is defined as zero.
  • Enthalpy of atomisation (ΔaH\Delta_a H): 1 mole of a substance broken completely into gaseous atoms. Always endothermic.
  • Bond dissociation enthalpy: 1 mole of a specific covalent bond broken in the gas phase. Always endothermic.
  • Enthalpy of sublimation / fusion / vaporisation: solid to vapour directly, solid to liquid at the melting point, or liquid to gas at the boiling point, all for 1 mole. All endothermic.
  • Enthalpy of ionisation: removing an electron from 1 mole of gaseous atoms or ions. Endothermic.
  • Enthalpy of solution (ΔsolH\Delta_{sol}H): 1 mole of solute dissolving in a specified or excess solvent; sign depends on the balance between lattice enthalpy (energy to separate the solid) and hydration/solvation enthalpy (energy released as ions or molecules are surrounded by solvent).
  • Enthalpy of dilution: the further heat change when an already-formed solution is diluted with more solvent.

Calorimetry provides the experimental link: a bomb calorimeter runs at constant volume, so it measures qv=ΔUq_v = \Delta U directly (typical for combustion), while a constant-pressure calorimeter measures qp=ΔHq_p = \Delta H. Only this qualitative distinction is needed, not instrument design.

Figure
An enthalpy ladder showing gaseous atoms at the top reached by atomisation from an element, and a compound reached below the element by an exothermic formation arrow
Relative enthalpy levels — atomisation up, formation down gaseous atoms (highest H) element(s), standard state compound atomisation, endothermic formation, usually exothermic Bond dissociation reverses atomisation for a single bond; combustion and solution are separate ladders of their own
Derivation AConnecting delta H and delta U through the gas-mole correction

The goal is to show, starting only from the definition H=U+PVH = U + PV and the constant-pressure condition, exactly why ΔH\Delta H and ΔU\Delta U for a reaction differ by the single correction term ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT, and why that term counts only gaseous species — this is the identity used to convert a calorimeter's ΔU\Delta U into the standard ΔH∘\Delta H^\circ quoted for a reaction such as combustion.

Step 1. Start from the definition of enthalpy, H=U+PVH = U + PV, and take the change for a reaction at constant pressure: ΔH=ΔU+Δ(PV)\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta(PV). Because pressure is fixed at PP, this becomes ΔH=ΔU+PΔV\Delta H = \Delta U + P\Delta V, where ΔV\Delta V is the total volume change of the system, products minus reactants.

Step 2. Split ΔV\Delta V into a solid/liquid part and a gas part. Solids and liquids occupy negligible, near-constant volume compared with gases, so essentially all of ΔV\Delta V comes from the change in the number of moles of gas, Δng\Delta n_g.

Step 3. Treat the gaseous species as ideal, so for the gas phase PV=ngRTPV = n_g RT at fixed TT and PP. The volume change contributed by gases is then ΔVgas=Δng RTP\Delta V_{\text{gas}} = \Delta n_g\,\dfrac{RT}{P}, so that PΔV≈PΔVgas=Δng RTP\Delta V \approx P\Delta V_{\text{gas}} = \Delta n_g\,RT.

Step 4. Substitute back into Step 1 to get ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT, with Δng\Delta n_g = (moles of gaseous products) − (moles of gaseous reactants). If a reaction has no change in gas moles (Δng=0\Delta n_g = 0), ΔH\Delta H and ΔU\Delta U are equal; if gas moles increase, ΔH\Delta H exceeds ΔU\Delta U; if gas moles decrease, ΔH\Delta H is smaller in magnitude than the exothermic ΔU\Delta U (less negative), matching the correction applied in the worked example below.

Worked example

For C3H8(g)+5O2(g)→3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)\text{C}_3\text{H}_8(g) + 5\text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow 3\text{CO}_2(g) + 4\text{H}_2\text{O}(l), ΔU∘=−2202 kJ mol−1\Delta U^\circ = -2202\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1} at 298 K. Find ΔH∘\Delta H^\circ for the combustion of propane, then use it to classify the reaction and check the size of the correction against the total.

Step 1. Identify gaseous species only — water here is liquid, so it is excluded from the gas count. Gaseous products: 3 CO23\ \text{CO}_2. Gaseous reactants: 1 C3H8+5 O2=61\ \text{C}_3\text{H}_8 + 5\ \text{O}_2 = 6 moles of gas.

Step 2. Compute Δng\Delta n_g = (gaseous products) − (gaseous reactants) =3−6=−3= 3 - 6 = -3.

Step 3. Apply ΔH=ΔU+ΔngRT\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta n_g RT with R=8.314×10−3 kJ K−1mol−1R = 8.314\times10^{-3}\ \text{kJ K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1} and T=298 KT = 298\ \text{K}: ΔngRT=(−3)(8.314×10−3)(298)=−7.432 kJ mol−1\Delta n_g RT = (-3)(8.314\times10^{-3})(298) = -7.432\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}.

Step 4. Add the correction: ΔH∘=−2202+(−7.432)=−2209.4 kJ mol−1\Delta H^\circ = -2202 + (-7.432) = -2209.4\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}. This is the standard enthalpy of combustion of propane, and it is exothermic, as combustion always is. The correction is only about 0.3%0.3\% of the total, because it moves relatively few gas moles compared with the huge bond-energy change of complete combustion. ΔHc∘(C3H8)=−2209.4 kJ mol−1\Delta H^\circ_c(\text{C}_3\text{H}_8) = -2209.4\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}.

Competitive stretch

Given the enthalpy of atomisation of CH4(g)\text{CH}_4(g) is 1665 kJ mol−11665\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}, find the average C–H bond dissociation enthalpy, and separately classify H2O(l)→H2O(g)\text{H}_2\text{O}(l) \rightarrow \text{H}_2\text{O}(g) at 373 K.

Step 1. Atomisation of methane, CH4(g)→C(g)+4H(g)\text{CH}_4(g) \rightarrow \text{C}(g) + 4\text{H}(g), breaks all 4 equivalent C–H bonds, so the average bond dissociation enthalpy per bond is 16654=416.25 kJ mol−1\dfrac{1665}{4} = 416.25\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}. This is an average — the four real stepwise bond enthalpies in CH4→CH3→CH2→CH→C\text{CH}_4 \rightarrow \text{CH}_3 \rightarrow \text{CH}_2 \rightarrow \text{CH} \rightarrow \text{C} are not identical to each other.

Step 2. For H2O(l)→H2O(g)\text{H}_2\text{O}(l) \rightarrow \text{H}_2\text{O}(g), heat must be supplied to overcome hydrogen bonding and convert liquid to vapour, so ΔH>0\Delta H > 0: the process is endothermic, and since it occurs at the boiling point it is the enthalpy of vaporisation, ΔvapH\Delta_{vap}H.

Common traps

  • Forgetting the sign convention in Δng\Delta n_g — count only gaseous species, and take products minus reactants, not the other way round.
  • Assuming every enthalpy of formation is exothermic — many are not; formation of NO(g)\text{NO}(g) from N2\text{N}_2 and O2\text{O}_2 has a positive ΔfH∘\Delta_f H^\circ.
  • Confusing enthalpy of solution with enthalpy of dilution — solution is dissolving in fresh or excess solvent, dilution is the extra heat change on adding more solvent to a solution that already exists.
  • Treating tabulated bond dissociation enthalpies for molecules with several identical bonds (like the four C–H bonds in methane) as exact stepwise values rather than averages.

Ask the tutor: If you are unsure which named enthalpy applies to a given process, or how to find Δng\Delta n_g from a balanced equation, ask the AI tutor for a quick drill matching definitions to examples.

Why is delta H usually quoted instead of delta U if they are so close in value

Because almost every real reaction happens open to the atmosphere, at constant pressure, not constant volume. Under those everyday conditions ΔH=qp\Delta H = q_p is exactly the heat you can measure with a simple calorimeter, so it is the natural quantity to report. ΔU\Delta U matters mainly when a reaction is deliberately run at constant volume, as in a bomb calorimeter, and even then chemists usually convert the result to ΔH∘\Delta H^\circ using ΔngRT\Delta n_g RT so it can be compared with other tabulated values.

Why are bond dissociation enthalpy and atomisation enthalpy always positive

Both describe breaking bonds to separate a substance into individual gaseous atoms, and breaking any chemical bond requires an input of energy to overcome the attraction holding the atoms together — there is no way to do this and release net energy. The reverse process, atoms combining to form bonds, is always exothermic, which is consistent with formation enthalpies of stable compounds usually being negative. So endothermic bond-breaking and exothermic bond-making are two faces of the same energy diagram.

How do I know whether enthalpy of solution will be exothermic or endothermic for a given salt

It depends on which is larger in magnitude: the lattice enthalpy (energy needed to pull the solid's ions apart) or the hydration enthalpy (energy released as those ions become surrounded by solvent molecules). If hydration releases more energy than the lattice absorbed, dissolving is exothermic overall; if the lattice enthalpy dominates, dissolving is endothermic. At Class 11 level you are usually given both values and asked to add them, rather than predicting the sign from first principles.

Before this

Where this leads