Types of spectra

Pass sunlight through a glass prism and it fans out into an unbroken rainbow — every colour bleeding smoothly into the next. Pass the glow of excited hydrogen gas through the same prism and something completely different appears: a handful of sharp, separate bright lines on a dark background, with nothing in between. That contrast between a continuous spectrum and a line spectrum is not a curiosity of optics — it is the single experimental fact that forced physicists to abandon Rutherford's picture of the atom. If electrons could orbit at any distance with any energy, hydrogen would glow with every wavelength, and its spectrum would look like the rainbow. It does not. The discrete hydrogen line spectrum says the electron's energy is restricted to a fixed ladder of allowed values, and it was this single clue that Bohr built his atomic model to explain.

The core insight

A continuous spectrum is an unbroken band of all wavelengths from a hot dense source, while a line spectrum is a set of sharp, discrete wavelengths unique to each element, and the very existence of discrete lines is direct evidence that an atom's electrons can only occupy specific, quantised energy levels.

The core idea

Continuous spectrum. White light — from the Sun, an incandescent filament, or any sufficiently hot solid, liquid, or dense gas — contains photons of essentially every wavelength in the visible range. Dispersed by a prism, it spreads into an unbroken band merging smoothly from violet to red, exactly like a rainbow. Nothing about a continuous spectrum identifies which element produced it; it depends only on temperature.

Line (atomic) spectrum. Atoms of a single element in the gaseous state, excited by an electric discharge at low pressure or by heating a volatile salt in a flame, emit light only at certain specific wavelengths, never a continuous range. Passed through a prism, this becomes a series of sharp bright lines against a dark background — a line spectrum, also called an atomic spectrum. Every element has its own unique pattern of lines, as distinctive as a fingerprint, which is why flame tests and astronomical spectroscopy can identify elements from their light alone.

Emission versus absorption spectra. An emission spectrum is the light directly given off by a glowing source — continuous if the source is hot and dense, or a line spectrum if it is an excited low-pressure atomic gas. An absorption spectrum is produced instead when white light passes through a cooler gas of some element on its way to the observer: the gas absorbs exactly the wavelengths it would itself emit if excited, so those wavelengths vanish from the transmitted beam and show up as dark lines at precisely the same positions the bright emission lines would occupy. Emission and absorption line spectra of a given element therefore share identical line positions; only the appearance — bright lines on dark, or dark lines on bright — differs.

Why the lines are discrete: the quantum link. A photon is emitted only when an electron falls from a higher allowed energy level EiE_i to a lower one EfE_f, and the photon carries away exactly that energy difference:

Ephoton=hν=hcλ=Ei−Ef.(1)E_{\text{photon}} = h\nu = \frac{hc}{\lambda} = E_i - E_f. \qquad (1)

where: EphotonE_{\text{photon}} is the photon's energy (joules), h=6.626×10−34 J sh = 6.626\times10^{-34}\ \text{J s} is Planck's constant, ν\nu is the photon's frequency (hertz), c=3.0×108 m s−1c = 3.0\times10^8\ \text{m s}^{-1} is the speed of light, λ\lambda is the emitted wavelength (metres), and Ei−EfE_i - E_f is the fixed energy gap between two allowed levels of the atom. Because an atom has only a discrete set of allowed levels, only a discrete set of energy gaps Ei−EfE_i - E_f exists, and therefore only a discrete set of photon wavelengths can ever be emitted — this is exactly why a line spectrum is made of sharp lines rather than a smear of colour. If electron energies could vary continuously, as Rutherford's model implicitly allowed, every possible energy gap would occur and the spectrum would be continuous, just like sunlight; the observed discreteness is the direct experimental fingerprint of quantisation, and it is the fact Bohr's model was built to explain.

Figure
Prism separating light from three sources into a continuous rainbow band, a line spectrum of sharp bright lines and a line spectrum of sharp dark lines on a bright background
Three kinds of spectra seen through a prism continuous spectrum (hot dense source) emission line spectrum (excited low pressure gas) absorption line spectrum (cool gas in front of a hot source) Same element, same line positions in emission and absorption — only bright vs dark differs. Discrete lines exist only because an atom's allowed energy levels are discrete, not continuous.
Derivation APhoton energy of a hydrogen spectral line from its wavelength

The goal is to show, using only Planck's relation between a photon's energy and its wavelength, how the single measured wavelength of a bright line in hydrogen's emission spectrum can be converted into the exact energy released when one electron falls from a higher allowed level to a lower one — the calculation that turns "a line sits at this wavelength" into "this is the size of one specific quantum jump inside the atom," the link that lets a purely optical measurement reveal the atom's internal energy-level structure.

Step 1. Start from the wave relation between frequency and wavelength for light travelling at speed cc: ν=c/λ\nu = c/\lambda. This lets a measured wavelength (what a spectrometer directly records) be converted into a frequency.

Step 2. Apply Planck's relation, Ephoton=hνE_{\text{photon}} = h\nu, and substitute Step 1 to write the photon's energy directly in terms of its wavelength: Ephoton=h(cλ)=hcλE_{\text{photon}} = h\left(\dfrac{c}{\lambda}\right) = \dfrac{hc}{\lambda}.

Step 3. Take the red line in hydrogen's visible emission spectrum, at λ=656 nm=656×10−9 m\lambda = 656\ \text{nm} = 656\times10^{-9}\ \text{m}. Substitute h=6.626×10−34 J sh = 6.626\times10^{-34}\ \text{J s} and c=3.0×108 m s−1c = 3.0\times10^8\ \text{m s}^{-1}: Ephoton=(6.626×10−34)(3.0×108)656×10−9=3.03×10−19 JE_{\text{photon}} = \dfrac{(6.626\times10^{-34})(3.0\times10^{8})}{656\times10^{-9}} = 3.03\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}.

Step 4. Convert to electronvolts using 1 eV=1.602×10−19 J1\ \text{eV} = 1.602\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}: Ephoton=3.03×10−191.602×10−19=1.89 eVE_{\text{photon}} = \dfrac{3.03\times10^{-19}}{1.602\times10^{-19}} = 1.89\ \text{eV}. This is the exact energy released as one electron falls between two specific allowed levels in the hydrogen atom; because only a fixed set of level gaps exist, only a fixed set of such photon energies — and therefore wavelengths — can ever appear, which is precisely why the spectrum is a set of sharp lines and not a continuous smear.

Worked example

Question. Two sealed glass tubes contain low-pressure hydrogen gas and low-pressure neon gas, each excited by an electric discharge. (a) Explain why the two tubes produce different, but each individually reproducible, line patterns when their light is passed through a prism. (b) The hydrogen tube's red line sits at 656 nm656\ \text{nm}. Find the energy, in joules and electronvolts, of the photons making up that line.

Step 1. In each tube, the discharge raises atoms to higher energy levels; as they relax back down, each atom emits a photon whose energy equals the exact difference between the two levels involved, following Ephoton=hc/λE_{\text{photon}} = hc/\lambda.

Step 2. Because each element has its own distinct, intrinsic set of allowed electron energy levels, the set of possible energy gaps — and hence possible emitted wavelengths — differs from element to element. Hydrogen therefore shows one specific set of sharp lines (including the 656656, 486486, 434434 and 410 nm410\ \text{nm} Balmer lines), while neon shows an entirely different set (the basis of orange-red neon signs).

Step 3. Since each element's energy levels are fixed, unchanging properties of the atom, the same discharge conditions reproduce exactly the same line pattern every time — this reproducibility is what makes line spectra usable as fingerprints for identification.

Step 4. For the 656 nm656\ \text{nm} hydrogen line: Ephoton=hcλ=(6.626×10−34)(3.0×108)656×10−9=3.03×10−19 JE_{\text{photon}} = \dfrac{hc}{\lambda} = \dfrac{(6.626\times10^{-34})(3.0\times10^{8})}{656\times10^{-9}} = 3.03\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}, which is 3.03×10−19/1.602×10−19=1.89 eV3.03\times10^{-19}/1.602\times10^{-19} = 1.89\ \text{eV}. The two gases give different, reproducible line patterns because each element has its own fixed set of energy levels, and the hydrogen red line at 656 nm carries a photon energy of 3.03 × 10⁻¹⁹ J, or 1.89 eV.

Common traps

  • Confusing a continuous spectrum (hot solid, liquid, or dense gas; unbroken band of colour) with a line spectrum (excited low-pressure atomic gas; discrete sharp lines) — the source and the mechanism are entirely different.
  • Thinking emission and absorption line spectra of the same element occur at different wavelengths — they occur at exactly the same wavelengths; only bright-on-dark versus dark-on-bright differs.
  • Believing a line spectrum shows atoms can have any energy — it shows the opposite: discreteness in the spectrum is direct evidence that only certain, quantised energies are allowed.
  • Plugging wavelength directly into E=hνE = h\nu without first converting to frequency via ν=c/λ\nu = c/\lambda, or mixing joules and electronvolts without converting consistently.

Ask the tutor: curious how the exact positions of the Balmer lines connect to the Rydberg equation and Bohr's allowed energy levels — ask the AI tutor to bridge this topic into Bohr's atomic model.

Why do emission and absorption spectra of the same element look opposite but sit at the same wavelengths?

Both arise from the very same set of allowed energy-level gaps inside the atom. In emission, an excited atom drops from a higher level to a lower one and radiates a photon of exactly that energy, adding a bright line at that wavelength. In absorption, white light of many wavelengths passes through the cooler gas, and the atom absorbs a photon of exactly the same energy to jump upward between the same two levels, removing that wavelength from the transmitted beam and leaving a dark line. Since the level gaps are identical either way, the line positions coincide; only whether the line is added (bright) or subtracted (dark) differs.

Why can Rutherford's model not explain hydrogen's line spectrum?

Rutherford's model let an electron orbit the nucleus at any radius with any energy, since nothing in his picture restricted the orbit to special values. If that were true, an excited hydrogen atom could release photons of any energy as the electron settled into any orbit, and the emitted light would spread into a continuous spectrum, exactly like sunlight. Real hydrogen instead emits only a handful of sharp lines. That mismatch is not a minor detail; it shows electron energies must be restricted to a discrete ladder of allowed values, which is exactly the postulate Bohr's model adds to fix Rutherford's picture.

Does every atom of hydrogen in a discharge tube produce every one of the Balmer lines at once?

Across the huge number of atoms in even a small volume of low-pressure gas, different atoms get excited to different higher energy levels by the discharge, and each individual atom emits one photon per downward jump it makes. Collected over billions of atoms and many jumps, essentially every allowed transition occurs somewhere in the tube, so the full set of lines (656, 486, 434, 410 nm, and more outside the visible range) appears together in the spectrum, even though a single atom emits only one photon at a time as it cascades down through the levels.

Before this

Where this leads