Capillary rise

Dip a fine glass tube into water and the water climbs inside it, standing well above the level in the open dish — no pump, no pressure difference you can see, just a narrow tube and a curved surface. Dip the same tube into mercury and the opposite happens: the mercury inside sits lower than the level outside. This is capillary rise (or depression), and it is the same surface-tension physics that shapes soap bubbles and floating pins, now confined inside a narrow bore where the curved meniscus does something dramatic — it visibly lifts or pushes down a whole column of liquid against gravity. This article builds the uniform-bore formula for capillary rise from the excess pressure across a curved meniscus, shows why narrower tubes give a bigger rise, and works two contrasting numbers — water rising and mercury falling in the same tube.

The core insight

A narrow tube dipped in a wetting liquid rises a height h=2Tcos⁡θ/(ρgr)h = 2T\cos\theta/(\rho g r), set by balancing the meniscus's pressure deficit against the weight of the risen column.

The core idea

Capillarity is the rise or fall of a liquid inside a narrow tube (a capillary) dipped into it, driven by surface tension and the curved meniscus that forms at the liquid's edge inside the tube. Water rises in a fine glass capillary because it wets glass; mercury is depressed because it does not.

Why it happens. In a uniform-bore tube of radius rr dipped into a wetting liquid (angle of contact θ<90°\theta < 90°), the liquid inside curves into a concave meniscus, behaving like part of a sphere of radius R=r/cos⁡θR = r/\cos\theta. The excess-pressure result for a curved surface says the pressure just below this concave meniscus is lower than atmospheric by 2T/R2T/R. That pressure deficit pulls liquid up from the reservoir, and the column keeps rising until its own weight exactly cancels the deficit — equilibrium.

Balancing pressure and weight. At the flat outside surface, pressure is atmospheric, P0P_0. Just below the meniscus inside the tube, pressure is P0−2T/RP_0 - 2T/R. That point also sits a depth hh below the top of the risen column, so hydrostatically P0=(P0−2T/R)+ρghP_0 = (P_0 - 2T/R) + \rho g h, which rearranges to

h=2Tcos⁡θρgrh = \frac{2T\cos\theta}{\rho g r}

where: TT is the liquid's surface tension, θ\theta is the angle of contact with the tube material, ρ\rho is the liquid's density, gg is the acceleration due to gravity, and rr is the uniform radius of the capillary bore.

Figure
Two capillary tubes side by side dipped in liquid reservoirs, water rising with a concave meniscus on the left and mercury depressed with a convex meniscus on the right
Wetting rises, non-wetting is depressed outside level h (rise) water in glass theta less than 90, concave meniscus outside level h (depression) mercury in glass theta greater than 90, convex meniscus

Key features. h∝1/rh \propto 1/r, so a narrower tube gives a greater rise — capillary effects matter only in fine tubes. If θ<90°\theta < 90° (wetting), cos⁡θ>0\cos\theta > 0 and the liquid rises; if θ>90°\theta > 90° (non-wetting), cos⁡θ<0\cos\theta < 0 and the liquid is depressed. For water in clean glass, θ≈0°\theta \approx 0°, so cos⁡θ≈1\cos\theta \approx 1 and the formula simplifies to h=2T/(ρgr)h = 2T/(\rho g r).

Derivation AHeight of capillary rise from the pressure balance at a curved meniscus

The goal is to derive h=2Tcos⁡θ/(ρgr)h = 2T\cos\theta/(\rho g r) for a liquid in a uniform-bore capillary, starting only from the excess-pressure-across-a-curved-surface result and simple hydrostatics — no new physics beyond those two ingredients, just tracking pressure at two points connected by a liquid column.

Step 1. Set up the meniscus geometry. When the tube of radius rr is dipped into a wetting liquid, the liquid surface inside curves to meet the glass at the angle of contact θ\theta. Treating the meniscus as a spherical cap, simple geometry (the radius to the tube wall divided by cos⁡θ\cos\theta) gives the meniscus's radius of curvature R=r/cos⁡θR = r/\cos\theta. A small θ\theta (strongly wetting) makes RR close to rr; a larger θ\theta makes RR bigger, and the meniscus flatter.

Step 2. Apply the excess-pressure result to this concave surface. For a concave meniscus, the pressure on the concave (liquid) side is lower than on the convex (air) side by 2T/R2T/R. Just above the meniscus, in the air, the pressure is atmospheric P0P_0. So just below the meniscus, inside the liquid, the pressure is P0−2T/RP_0 - 2T/R.

Step 3. Write the hydrostatic balance between the meniscus and the reservoir surface. Consider the point just below the meniscus (pressure P0−2T/RP_0 - 2T/R) and the point at the flat liquid surface outside the tube, at the same level as the reservoir (pressure P0P_0, atmospheric, since it is an open surface). The point below the meniscus lies a depth hh below the top of the risen liquid column, and — since the tube and reservoir are connected liquid — pressure increases with depth at the usual rate ρg\rho g: P0=(P0−2TR)+ρghP_0 = \left(P_0 - \dfrac{2T}{R}\right) + \rho g h.

Step 4. Solve for hh. The P0P_0 terms cancel, leaving ρgh=2T/R\rho g h = 2T/R. Substituting R=r/cos⁡θR = r/\cos\theta from Step 1 gives ρgh=2Tcos⁡θ/r\rho g h = 2T\cos\theta/r, so h=2Tcos⁡θρgrh = \dfrac{2T\cos\theta}{\rho g r} — rise for a wetting liquid (cos⁡θ>0\cos\theta > 0), and, by the same algebra with θ>90°\theta > 90° making cos⁡θ\cos\theta negative, depression for a non-wetting one.

Worked example

A clean glass capillary of radius r=0.20 mmr = 0.20\ \text{mm} is dipped vertically in water, with Twater=0.072 N/mT_{\text{water}} = 0.072\ \text{N/m}, ρwater=1000 kg/m3\rho_{\text{water}} = 1000\ \text{kg/m}^3, θ≈0°\theta \approx 0°, and g=9.8 m/s2g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2.

Step 1. Substitute into h=2Tcos⁡θ/(ρgr)h = 2T\cos\theta/(\rho g r) with cos⁡0°=1\cos 0° = 1: h=2×0.072×11000×9.8×0.20×10−3h = \dfrac{2 \times 0.072 \times 1}{1000 \times 9.8 \times 0.20\times10^{-3}}.

Step 2. Evaluate the denominator first: 1000×9.8×0.20×10−3=1.961000 \times 9.8 \times 0.20\times10^{-3} = 1.96.

Step 3. Divide: h=0.1441.96≈0.0735 mh = \dfrac{0.144}{1.96} \approx 0.0735\ \text{m}. Water rises about 7.35 cm7.35\ \text{cm} in this fine capillary.

Competitive stretch

The same tube is now dipped in mercury: Tmercury=0.465 N/mT_{\text{mercury}} = 0.465\ \text{N/m}, ρmercury=13600 kg/m3\rho_{\text{mercury}} = 13600\ \text{kg/m}^3, θ=140°\theta = 140°.

Step 1. cos⁡140°=−cos⁡40°≈−0.766\cos 140° = -\cos 40° \approx -0.766, negative because mercury is non-wetting.

Step 2. h=2×0.465×(−0.766)13600×9.8×0.20×10−3=−0.712426.656≈−0.0267 mh = \dfrac{2 \times 0.465 \times (-0.766)}{13600 \times 9.8 \times 0.20\times10^{-3}} = \dfrac{-0.7124}{26.656} \approx -0.0267\ \text{m}.

Step 3. The negative sign confirms depression, not rise. Mercury is pushed down about 2.67 cm2.67\ \text{cm} below the outside level — consistent with mercury not wetting glass.

Common traps

  • Forgetting cos⁡θ\cos\theta — the simplified h=2T/(ρgr)h = 2T/(\rho g r) only holds for θ≈0°\theta \approx 0° (pure water in very clean glass); other liquid-solid pairs need cos⁡θ\cos\theta, which can flip the sign of hh.
  • Thinking a wider tube gives a bigger rise — hh is inversely proportional to rr, so it is narrower tubes that rise higher.
  • Mixing up rise and depression — wetting (θ<90°\theta < 90°) rises, non-wetting (θ>90°\theta > 90°) is depressed; mercury in glass is the standard depression example.
  • Using the uniform-bore formula on a tube whose radius changes along its length — the derivation assumes constant rr, so a tapering or irregular bore needs a different treatment.

Ask the tutor: Want to connect capillary rise back to excess pressure and angle of contact, or try a problem where the tube radius or liquid is unknown and you must invert the formula?

Why does the liquid stop rising instead of climbing forever?

As the column rises, its weight grows, and that weight adds to the pressure at the base of the column. The meniscus's pressure deficit is fixed once the tube and liquid are fixed (it depends only on TT, θ\theta and rr, not on how far the liquid has already climbed). So the column rises exactly until the extra weight of liquid balances that fixed pressure deficit — at that height the pressures at the two connected points match, and the liquid stops. It is a genuine equilibrium, not a leak or a limit on flow.

Does the formula change if the tube is tilted instead of vertical?

The vertical height hh measured from the outside liquid level to the meniscus stays the same, because the pressure balance only cares about vertical depth, not the length of tube the liquid travels through. A tilted tube simply makes the liquid travel a longer slant distance to reach the same vertical height hh — so the length of liquid column along the tube is h/cos⁡(tilt angle)h/\cos(\text{tilt angle}), but hh itself, and hence the formula h=2Tcos⁡θ/(ρgr)h = 2T\cos\theta/(\rho g r), is unaffected.

Why is the effect called capillary rise if mercury actually falls?

The name comes from the Latin capillus, hair, describing the hair-thin tubes where the effect is visible at all — "capillary" describes the tube, not the direction of the effect. "Capillary rise" is the traditional name for the whole phenomenon (rise or fall) because the wetting case, where the liquid climbs, is the more commonly cited example; the same formula, with a negative cos⁡θ\cos\theta, correctly predicts the mercury case as a negative hh, meaning depression rather than rise.

Before this