Batteries

Every torch, car and hearing aid quietly runs on the same trick: lock a spontaneous redox reaction inside a sealed package and let electrons flow out through a wire instead of jumping directly between reactants. A battery is just a galvanic cell (or several wired in series) engineered for portability, and the entire chapter comes down to one question asked of each design — once the redox reaction has run, can it be run backwards? Cells that answer no are primary; cells that answer yes are secondary; cells that never run out because fuel keeps arriving from outside are fuel cells. This article revisits the four named batteries of the ISC syllabus — Leclanché, mercury, lead storage, and the hydrogen–oxygen fuel cell — and adds the one piece of arithmetic examiners actually test: how single-cell EMFs combine when cells are wired in series to build a working battery.

The core insight

A battery packages a redox reaction for portable use, and its entire personality — rechargeable or not, steady voltage or drifting, single-use or continuously fed — follows from whether that reaction can be driven backwards by an external current.

The core idea

Three families, one question. Every named battery is sorted by asking whether its cell reaction is reversible on recharging.

  • Primary cells — the reaction runs once. Reactants are consumed, side products build up around the electrodes, and the cell is discarded. Leclanché (dry) cell and mercury cell belong here.
  • Secondary cells — an external current forces the reaction exactly backwards, regenerating the original electrodes and electrolyte. The lead storage accumulator is the syllabus example; it can be discharged and recharged hundreds of times.
  • Fuel cells — fuel and oxidant are fed in continuously from an external reservoir rather than stored inside, so the cell keeps producing current as long as it is supplied. The H2\text{H}_2–O2\text{O}_2 fuel cell is the standard case.

Why voltage behaves differently across the three. A cell's EMF tracks the concentrations of the species at its electrodes (the same logic behind the Nernst equation you met with simple galvanic cells). In the Leclanché cell the electrolyte paste is consumed and side products accumulate, so the EMF drifts down with use. In the mercury cell the overall reaction Zn(Hg)+HgO→ZnO+Hg\text{Zn(Hg)} + \text{HgO} \rightarrow \text{ZnO} + \text{Hg} involves no dissolved ion whose concentration changes — OH−\text{OH}^- is regenerated at the cathode exactly as fast as it is used at the anode — so the EMF stays essentially flat until the reactants nearly run out.

Building a battery from cells. A single galvanic cell rarely supplies the voltage a real device needs, so practical batteries wire several identical cells in series, positive terminal to negative terminal, so their EMFs add:

Ebattery=n×Ecell.(1)E_{\text{battery}} = n \times E_{\text{cell}}. \qquad (1)

where: EbatteryE_{\text{battery}} is the terminal voltage of the assembled battery, EcellE_{\text{cell}} is the EMF of one identical cell, and nn is the number of cells connected in series. This is exactly why a lead-acid car battery, built from cells each near 2 V2\ \text{V}, is packaged as six cells in series to give the familiar 12 V12\ \text{V}.

Figure
Bar chart comparing the typical EMF in volts of the Leclanché cell mercury cell and lead storage cell per cell
Typical EMF per cell 0 1.0 V 2.0 V 1.5 V Leclanché 1.35 V Mercury 2.0 V Lead storage

Why it works

The lead storage battery is the one named example that is truly rechargeable, and the reason is baked into what it produces on discharge. Both the anode reaction (Pb+SO42−→PbSO4+2e−\text{Pb} + \text{SO}_4^{2-} \rightarrow \text{PbSO}_4 + 2e^-) and the cathode reaction (PbO2+SO42−+4H++2e−→PbSO4+2H2O\text{PbO}_2 + \text{SO}_4^{2-} + 4\text{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightarrow \text{PbSO}_4 + 2\text{H}_2\text{O}) deposit the same insoluble solid, PbSO4\text{PbSO}_4, directly onto the electrode surface it formed at — it does not dissolve away or drift off as a gas. Because the products stay put, physically attached exactly where the reverse reaction will need them, an external current can push electrons the other way and rebuild Pb\text{Pb} and PbO2\text{PbO}_2 in place. Contrast this with the Leclanché cell, where NH3\text{NH}_3 gas and other soluble by-products disperse through the electrolyte paste; even if you tried to force current backwards, there is no clean solid deposit sitting in the right place to reassemble. Reversibility, in other words, is not a property of "how strong" a reaction is — it is a property of whether the products remain physically available, undisturbed, at the electrode.

Worked example

Problem: A hearing aid needs a steady 4.05 V4.05\ \text{V} supply. Mercury cells are chosen because their voltage does not drift with use. Given a single mercury cell's EMF is 1.35 V1.35\ \text{V}, (a) how many cells must be connected in series, and (b) why is the mercury cell — rather than the Leclanché cell — the right choice for this device?

Step 1. Apply equation (1) with the target battery voltage and single-cell EMF: Ebattery=n×Ecell⇒4.05=n×1.35E_{\text{battery}} = n \times E_{\text{cell}} \Rightarrow 4.05 = n \times 1.35.

Step 2. Solve for nn: n=4.05/1.35=3n = 4.05 / 1.35 = 3. Three mercury cells wired in series deliver the required 4.05 V4.05\ \text{V}.

Step 3. Justify the choice of cell type: the mercury cell's overall reaction Zn(Hg)+HgO→ZnO+Hg\text{Zn(Hg)} + \text{HgO} \rightarrow \text{ZnO} + \text{Hg} involves no net change in dissolved-ion concentration, so its EMF holds steady near 1.35 V1.35\ \text{V} for almost its entire working life. A Leclanché cell of nominal 1.5 V1.5\ \text{V} would seem to need fewer cells for a similar voltage, but its EMF sags as the electrolyte paste is consumed — unacceptable for a hearing aid, which needs a dependable, unchanging reference voltage rather than just an initial value. Answer: 3 mercury cells in series, chosen for their flat discharge voltage rather than raw cell count.

Common traps

  • Calling the lead storage battery a "primary cell" — it is secondary, precisely because PbSO4\text{PbSO}_4 stays fixed at each electrode and can be driven back to Pb\text{Pb} and PbO2\text{PbO}_2 by recharging.
  • Assuming equation (1) applies to any combination of cells — it only adds EMFs correctly when identical cells are connected in series (terminal to terminal); mixing cell types or connecting them in parallel does not simply multiply the voltage.
  • Treating fuel cells as batteries that "store" fuel internally — they are supplied continuously from an external tank, which is what lets them run indefinitely rather than being an unusually large battery.
  • Mixing up which primary cell has the steadier voltage — both Leclanché and mercury cells are primary with zinc anodes, but only the mercury cell's reaction leaves ion concentrations unchanged.

Ask the tutor: if you would like a side-by-side comparison table of all four named batteries, or want to work through why fuel cells are considered more environmentally friendly than conventional batteries.

Why can't a Leclanché cell simply be recharged like a lead-acid battery?

Recharging needs the discharge products to still be sitting, intact, at the electrode where the reverse reaction can rebuild the original materials. In the lead storage cell both electrodes deposit the same insoluble PbSO4 exactly where it is needed. In the Leclanché cell, though, the cathode reaction produces NH3 gas and Mn2O3 that diffuse away or escape rather than staying fixed in place, and the zinc anode itself is physically consumed as the container corrodes. There is nothing tidy left in position to push back into Zn, MnO2 and NH4Cl, so forcing current backwards does not restore the cell.

If mercury cells hold a steadier voltage, why aren't they used everywhere instead of Leclanché cells?

Mercury cells are more expensive to manufacture, contain toxic mercury compounds that make disposal an environmental concern, and are typically made only in small button-cell sizes suited to low-current devices like watches and hearing aids. The Leclanché cell is cheap, easy to mass-produce in large sizes, and good enough for devices like torches and remote controls where a slowly falling voltage is not a problem. The choice is a trade-off between voltage stability and cost, size, and environmental impact — not a case of one cell being simply "better."

Does the series-EMF formula E = n times E_cell apply to fuel cells too?

Yes, the same idea holds — if you connect several identical fuel cells in series (a fuel cell "stack"), the terminal voltage is the number of cells times one cell's EMF, just as for the mercury or lead storage cell. What is different about fuel cells is not this arithmetic but the fact that each cell keeps producing that EMF indefinitely as long as H2 and O2 are supplied, rather than being limited by a fixed internal store of reactants the way primary and secondary cells are.

Before this

Where this leads