The Junction Diode & its I–V Curve

In the last article you built a p–n junction and let it settle: majority carriers diffused across, left behind a depletion region of bare ions, and raised a barrier potential of about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} in silicon that exactly stalled the diffusion. Nothing flowed. It was a beautifully balanced stalemate — and, as a device, completely useless. A junction that just sits there does no work. Now we connect a battery. This one move — an external voltage across the junction — turns the stalemate into the single most useful trick in electronics: a component that lets current through one way and blocks it the other. Push the battery one way and the barrier collapses, the depletion region thins, and after a small "knee" voltage the diode conducts freely. Reverse the battery and the barrier grows taller, the depletion region widens, and only a whisper of current leaks through, until at some large reverse voltage the junction breaks down. That lopsided behaviour, captured in one graph called the I–V characteristic, is what makes a junction diode. This is the workhorse of the chapter. Every rectifier in your phone charger, every LED, and every solar cell starts here, with the shape of one curve. This article follows what happens as you sweep the voltage from forward to reverse: why the current stays near zero below the knee, why it explodes above it, why the reverse current is tiny but never quite zero, and how a real diode differs from the "ideal one-way switch" you will draw from now on. School algebra and the barrier picture you already own carry all of it.

Key takeaways
  • A junction diode conducts one way and blocks the other. Forward bias (p to battery ++) lowers the junction barrier and current flows freely past a small knee voltage; reverse bias raises the barrier and only a tiny leakage current flows.
  • The knee (cut-in) voltage is set by the material: about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} for silicon and 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} for germanium — the same values as the junction's barrier potential, because that is the barrier the applied voltage must cancel.
  • Below the knee the current is negligible; above it, the current rises almost vertically and is limited only by the external resistance, not by the diode. The diode itself then behaves like a closed switch with a small fixed drop.
  • In reverse bias the current is a tiny, nearly-constant reverse saturation current I0I_0 (microamps or less), set by thermally generated minority carriers — until the reverse voltage reaches breakdown, where the current shoots up.
  • The current–voltage relation is exponential, summarised by the quoted diode (Shockley) equation I=I0(eV/nVT−1)I = I_0\big(e^{V/nV_T}-1\big), with thermal voltage VT=kT/e≈0.026 VV_T = kT/e \approx 0.026\ \text{V} at 300 K300\ \text{K}. Its shape is all a school course needs.
  • An ideal diode is a perfect one-way switch: zero drop and zero resistance forward, infinite resistance reverse. Real diodes add a knee voltage and a small dynamic resistance.
  • Key idea: a junction diode is a one-way valve for current — forward bias cancels the barrier so current flows past a knee of about 0.7 V (Si) or 0.3 V (Ge), while reverse bias reinforces the barrier so only a tiny saturation current leaks through until breakdown, and the whole story is one lopsided I–V curve.
The core insight

A junction diode passes current almost freely once a forward bias exceeds its knee voltage (about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} for silicon, 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} for germanium) because that voltage cancels the junction barrier, while a reverse bias reinforces the barrier and allows only a tiny nearly-constant saturation current until breakdown — so its I–V characteristic is sharply one-directional, the essence of a one-way electrical valve.

Where this lives today

The junction diode is the most-manufactured active device on Earth, and its one-way curve is the first thing every descendant relies on. Bridge rectifiers in every mains adapter use four diodes to turn AC into DC — the next article. Light-emitting diodes are forward-biased junctions whose recombination energy comes out as light; photodiodes and solar cells run the same junction in reverse or open-circuit to turn light into current. Zener diodes live deliberately in the breakdown region to pin a voltage, and fast Schottky diodes trade the 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} knee for a 0.2 V0.2\ \text{V} one to switch quickly in power supplies. And the exponential I–V law is not just a diode fact: the same Boltzmann-factor physics sets the current in a transistor, so the equation you quoted here reappears at the heart of every amplifier and logic gate in the rest of this chapter. Master the curve, and the whole of electronics opens up.

The physical picture

A diode is nothing more than a single p–n junction with a wire (a terminal) attached to each end. The p-side terminal is called the anode, the n-side the cathode, and on the device a painted band marks the cathode. Everything the diode does follows from one question: which way does the external battery push against the junction's built-in barrier? Recall the equilibrium junction. Majority electrons from the n-side and holes from the p-side diffuse across and recombine near the boundary, leaving a thin depletion region stripped of mobile carriers and populated only by fixed, charged donor and acceptor ions. Those ions set up an internal electric field and a potential barrier — about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} in silicon, 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} in germanium — pointing from the n-side to the p-side, which repels further diffusion. At equilibrium the diffusion of majority carriers is exactly balanced by the drift of the few minority carriers, and the net current is zero. Now bias it. In forward bias we connect the battery's positive terminal to the p-side and negative to the n-side. The battery's field opposes the junction's internal field, so it lowers the barrier. Holes on the p-side and electrons on the n-side are pushed toward the junction; the depletion region narrows. As the applied voltage climbs toward the barrier value, the barrier shrinks toward zero and majority carriers begin pouring across in enormous numbers. Below the knee almost nothing happens; just past it, the current rises almost vertically. In reverse bias we flip the battery: positive to the n-side, negative to the p-side. Now the battery's field adds to the junction's field, raising the barrier and pulling majority carriers away from the junction. The depletion region widens. Majority-carrier diffusion is choked off completely. What remains is a trickle: the thermally generated minority carriers — electrons on the p-side, holes on the n-side — that are swept across by the strong field. This is the reverse saturation current I0I_0, and it is tiny (microamps in germanium, nanoamps in silicon) and almost independent of how hard you reverse-bias, because it is limited by how fast heat generates minority carriers, not by the voltage.

Figure
Forward bias connects the battery plus to the p-side, lowering the junction barrier and narrowing the depletion region so majority carriers flood across, while reverse bias connects plus to the n-side, raising the barrier and widening the depletion region so only a tiny minority-carrier saturation current leaks through
Biasing the junction — forward lowers the barrier, reverse raises it FORWARD BIAS — conducts p n thin depletion + – large forward current I REVERSE BIAS — blocks p n wide depletion – + tiny saturation current I₀ barrier height forward: barrier lowered → carriers cross reverse: barrier raised → carriers blocked

So the diode's whole personality is asymmetry. One direction: open the gate, current floods, the diode barely resists. The other: shut the gate, current chokes to a trickle. To make that quantitative — and to see where the current turns on — we plot it.

Reading the I–V characteristic

The I–V characteristic is a graph of the current II through the diode against the voltage VV across it, measured by sweeping a variable supply and reading a milliammeter (forward) or microammeter (reverse). By convention VV is positive in forward bias, negative in reverse. Because forward and reverse currents differ by a factor of thousands, the two halves are almost always drawn on different scales (milliamps forward, microamps reverse). In the forward region, for VV below the knee voltage VγV_\gamma (also called the cut-in or threshold voltage), the current is negligible: the barrier is only partly cancelled and few carriers have enough energy to cross. Once VV passes the knee — about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} for silicon, 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} for germanium — the barrier is essentially gone and the current shoots up almost vertically. Beyond the knee the diode drops only a small, nearly constant voltage; the current is then set by whatever resistance is in the external circuit. In the reverse region, the current is the tiny reverse saturation current I0I_0, nearly flat and independent of voltage — the diode is effectively "off." But if you keep increasing the reverse voltage, at the breakdown voltage VBRV_{BR} the reverse current suddenly rises very steeply (Zener or avalanche breakdown, the subject of a later article). For ordinary rectifier diodes VBRV_{BR} is tens to hundreds of volts and reaching it usually destroys the device; a diode built for breakdown (a Zener) uses it deliberately.

Figure
The diode I–V characteristic curve: in forward bias the current stays near zero until the knee voltage near 0.7 volts for silicon then rises almost vertically in milliamps, while in reverse bias only a tiny microamp saturation current flows until the breakdown voltage where the reverse current plunges steeply
The diode I–V characteristic — one lopsided curve V I forward V (volts) forward I (mA) reverse V reverse I (µA) 0.7 V knee Ge 0.3 V Si 0.7 V V_BR breakdown tiny saturation current I₀ conducts: rises almost vertically forward and reverse are drawn on different current scales — mA one way, µA the other

Two features deserve emphasis before we compute. First, the "knee" is not a hard wall: the current does not switch on abruptly at exactly 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}; it rises exponentially the whole way, but so steeply that on a linear plot it looks like a sudden turn-on. The knee is simply where that exponential becomes visible against the milliamp scale. Second, the forward drop is not truly constant — it creeps up as current rises (roughly 60 mV60\ \text{mV} per tenfold increase, as we will see) — but for circuit work we approximate it as a fixed 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}.

The diode equation — quoted, not derived

The smooth exponential shape of the forward curve, and the flat saturation of the reverse, are both captured by a single relation, the diode equation (also the Shockley equation, after William Shockley, who derived it in 1949):

I=I0(eV/nVT−1).(1)I = I_0\left(e^{V/nV_T} - 1\right). \qquad (1)

where: II is the diode current, VV the voltage across it (positive forward, negative reverse), I0I_0 the reverse saturation current, nn the ideality factor (between 11 and 22; take n=1n=1 for an ideal junction), and VT=kT/eV_T = kT/e the thermal voltage. At room temperature (T=300 KT = 300\ \text{K}, Boltzmann constant k=8.617×10−5 eV/Kk = 8.617\times10^{-5}\ \text{eV/K}),

VT=kTe≈0.026 V=26 mV.(2)V_T = \frac{kT}{e} \approx 0.026\ \text{V} = 26\ \text{mV}. \qquad (2)

Deriving equation (1) properly requires counting how electrons and holes are distributed in energy — Fermi–Dirac statistics — and how they diffuse across the depletion region, which is genuinely beyond school algebra and needs calculus. We therefore quote it, exactly as every Class 12 text does, and only read off its shape. And its shape says everything: For a forward bias more than a few VTV_T (i.e. V≳0.1 VV \gtrsim 0.1\ \text{V}), the exponential is huge and the "−1-1" is negligible: I≈I0 eV/nVTI \approx I_0\,e^{V/nV_T} grows explosively — that is the near-vertical rise past the knee. For a reverse bias of more than a few VTV_T, the exponential collapses to nearly zero, so I≈I0(0−1)=−I0I \approx I_0(0 - 1) = -I_0: a small constant current in the reverse direction, exactly the saturation plateau. And at V=0V = 0, I=I0(1−1)=0I = I_0(1-1) = 0, as it must. One equation, both halves of the curve. The physical reading is the barrier picture again: the fraction of carriers with enough thermal energy to climb a barrier of height eVeV follows a Boltzmann factor e−eV/kTe^{-eV/kT}, and forward bias lowers the barrier, multiplying the current that crosses by eV/VTe^{V/V_T}. The steepness of the diode is the steepness of that exponential.

The diode in a circuit — the load line

A diode is almost never used alone; it sits in series with a resistor and a supply. The whole art of "using" a diode is finding its operating point — the one (V,I)(V, I) pair that satisfies both the diode's curve and the circuit at once. Apply Kirchhoff's voltage law to a supply VSV_S driving a diode (voltage VDV_D) in series with a resistor RR:

VS=VD+I R.(3)V_S = V_D + I\,R. \qquad (3)

where: VSV_S is the source voltage, VDV_D the voltage across the diode, II the common current, and RR the series resistance. Rearranged, I=(VS−VD)/RI = (V_S - V_D)/R — a straight line on the I–V plane called the load line, with slope −1/R-1/R. The diode must live on its own curve and on this line; where they cross is the operating point. That is the exact, graphical answer. For hand calculation we simplify.

Derivation AThe operating point by the constant-voltage-drop model

The goal is to find the current in a real diode–resistor circuit without a graph, by replacing the diode's curved characteristic with a simple algebraic model — the "constant-voltage-drop" model — in which a conducting silicon diode is treated as a fixed 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} drop (a germanium diode, 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V}). We will show why this is an excellent approximation, apply it to a concrete circuit, and check the error against the full picture, all with algebra only.

Step 1. Start from the exact series equation (3): VS=VD+IRV_S = V_D + IR. The problem is that VDV_D and II are linked by the diode's curved equation (1), so this is two equations in two unknowns with an exponential in one of them — not solvable by hand exactly.

Step 2. Use the key fact from the characteristic: once a silicon diode conducts appreciably, its forward drop barely changes — it sits near 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} whether the current is 1 mA1\ \text{mA} or 50 mA50\ \text{mA}, because the curve is nearly vertical there. So we approximate VD≈Vγ=0.7 VV_D \approx V_\gamma = 0.7\ \text{V} (a constant) whenever the diode is forward-conducting, and I≈0I \approx 0 when it is not.

Step 3. Substitute the constant into (3) and solve the now-linear equation for the current:

I=VS−VγR.(4)I = \frac{V_S - V_\gamma}{R}. \qquad (4)

Take a silicon diode driven by VS=5 VV_S = 5\ \text{V} through R=1 kΩ=1000 ΩR = 1\ \text{k}\Omega = 1000\ \Omega. Then I=(5−0.7)/1000=4.3×10−3 A=4.3 mAI = (5 - 0.7)/1000 = 4.3\times10^{-3}\ \text{A} = 4.3\ \text{mA}, and the resistor carries the remaining VS−Vγ=4.3 VV_S - V_\gamma = 4.3\ \text{V}. If instead the diode were germanium (Vγ=0.3 VV_\gamma = 0.3\ \text{V}): I=(5−0.3)/1000=4.7 mAI = (5 - 0.3)/1000 = 4.7\ \text{mA}.

Step 4. Check the model's honesty. The true diode drop at 4.3 mA4.3\ \text{mA} might be, say, 0.72 V0.72\ \text{V} rather than 0.70 V0.70\ \text{V} — a 0.02 V0.02\ \text{V} error out of a 4.3 V4.3\ \text{V} swing across the resistor, well under 1%1\% in the current. The approximation is excellent precisely because the diode curve is so steep: a large change in current costs only a tiny change in diode voltage. When VS≫VγV_S \gg V_\gamma the model is essentially exact; only when the supply is comparable to the knee (a 1 V1\ \text{V} supply, say) does the curvature matter and you must read the graph. Verified: VT=0.026 VV_T = 0.026\ \text{V}; Si current (5−0.7)/1000=4.3 mA(5-0.7)/1000 = 4.3\ \text{mA}; Ge current (5−0.3)/1000=4.7 mA(5-0.3)/1000 = 4.7\ \text{mA}; resistor drop 4.3 V4.3\ \text{V} — recomputed in verify_hs2-diode-iv-characteristics.py.

The constant-drop model is why, in every later circuit — rectifiers, clippers, logic gates — you may simply subtract 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} (Si) or 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} (Ge) per conducting diode and treat the rest as a resistor problem. But the model hides a subtlety worth one more derivation: how much the diode actually resists small changes.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minStatic versus dynamic resistance from the curve
Derivation BStatic versus dynamic resistance from the curve

The goal is to distinguish two different "resistances" a diode presents — the static (DC) resistance you get by dividing voltage by current at a point, and the dynamic (AC) resistance you get from the slope of the characteristic — and to compute both from a measured forward curve, so you can see why they differ by more than an order of magnitude and which one matters for a signal riding on a bias. Only ratios of finite differences are used; no calculus.

Step 1. Define them. The static resistance at an operating point is Rdc=V/IR_{dc} = V/I — the resistance a steady meter would read. The dynamic resistance is rd=ΔV/ΔIr_{d} = \Delta V/\Delta I — how much the diode voltage changes for a small change in current, i.e. the resistance seen by a small AC signal sitting on top of the DC bias.

Step 2. Read two nearby points off a silicon forward curve. Suppose at V=0.72 VV = 0.72\ \text{V} the current is I=15 mAI = 15\ \text{mA}, and a small step to V=0.70 VV = 0.70\ \text{V} drops it to I=5 mAI = 5\ \text{mA}. Then ΔV=0.72−0.70=0.02 V\Delta V = 0.72 - 0.70 = 0.02\ \text{V} and ΔI=15−5=10 mA=0.010 A\Delta I = 15 - 5 = 10\ \text{mA} = 0.010\ \text{A}.

Step 3. Compute both:

Rdc=VI=0.720.015=48 Ω,rd=ΔVΔI=0.020.010=2 Ω.(5)R_{dc} = \frac{V}{I} = \frac{0.72}{0.015} = 48\ \Omega, \qquad r_{d} = \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta I} = \frac{0.02}{0.010} = 2\ \Omega. \qquad (5)

The dynamic resistance is roughly 2424 times smaller than the static one. That is the exponential curve talking: the diode holds its voltage nearly fixed while the current swings, so changes meet very little resistance even though the ratio V/IV/I is much larger.

Step 4. Cross-check against the equation. Differentiating (1) gives the quoted small-signal result rd=nVT/Ir_d = nV_T/I (a calculus result we simply state). At I=15 mAI = 15\ \text{mA} with n=1n=1: rd=0.026/0.015=1.7 Ωr_d = 0.026/0.015 = 1.7\ \Omega — the same order as the 2 Ω2\ \Omega we read off the curve, confirming the picture. The lesson: for a signal, a forward-biased diode is a few-ohm device, not a 48 Ω48\ \Omega one; use the dynamic resistance for anything that varies. Verified: Rdc=0.72/0.015=48 ΩR_{dc} = 0.72/0.015 = 48\ \Omega; rd=0.02/0.010=2 Ωr_d = 0.02/0.010 = 2\ \Omega; quoted nVT/I=0.026/0.015=1.7 ΩnV_T/I = 0.026/0.015 = 1.7\ \Omega — recomputed in verify_hs2-diode-iv-characteristics.py.

Limiting cases

caseresultmeaning
forward V<VγV < V_\gammacurrent negligiblebarrier only partly cancelled; diode effectively off
forward V>VγV > V_\gammaII large, near-vertical, set by external RRbarrier gone; diode is a closed switch with ∼ ⁣0.7 V\sim\!0.7\ \text{V} drop
V=0V = 0I=0I = 0equation (1) gives I0(1−1)=0I_0(1-1)=0, as it must
reverse, ∣V∣<VBR|V| < V_{BR}I≈−I0I \approx -I_0, tiny and flatsaturation current; diode is an open switch
reverse, ∣V∣>VBR|V| > V_{BR}reverse current shoots upbreakdown (Zener/avalanche) — destructive for ordinary diodes
ideal diode0 V0\ \text{V} drop forward, 00 current reverseperfect one-way switch idealisation
temperature risesI0I_0 roughly doubles per ∼ ⁣10 ∘C\sim\!10\ ^\circ\text{C}; knee falls ∼ ⁣2 mV/∘C\sim\!2\ \text{mV}/^\circ\text{C} (Si)more thermal carriers; diode is heat-sensitive

Worked examples

Board level — diode and resistor, silicon versus germanium (CBSE and ICSE pattern)

A silicon diode is connected in series with a 220 Ω220\ \Omega resistor across a 5.0 V5.0\ \text{V} battery, correctly forward biased. Take the diode's forward drop as 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}. Find (a) the current in the circuit and (b) the voltage across the resistor. (c) Repeat for a germanium diode (0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} drop).

Step 1. Forward-biased and conducting, so use the constant-drop model I=(VS−Vγ)/RI = (V_S - V_\gamma)/R. With VS=5.0 VV_S = 5.0\ \text{V}, Vγ=0.7 VV_\gamma = 0.7\ \text{V}, R=220 ΩR = 220\ \Omega: the voltage left for the resistor is 5.0−0.7=4.3 V5.0 - 0.7 = 4.3\ \text{V}.

Step 2. Current: I=4.3/220=0.01955 A≈19.5 mAI = 4.3/220 = 0.01955\ \text{A} \approx \boxed{19.5\ \text{mA}}.

Step 3. Voltage across the resistor: VR=IR=4.3 VV_R = IR = 4.3\ \text{V} (which is just VS−VγV_S - V_\gamma, as it must be by KVL). Answer (a): 19.5 mA19.5\ \text{mA}; (b): 4.3 V4.3\ \text{V}.

Step 4. Germanium: drop is 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V}, so VR=5.0−0.3=4.7 VV_R = 5.0 - 0.3 = 4.7\ \text{V} and I=4.7/220=0.02136 A≈21.4 mAI = 4.7/220 = 0.02136\ \text{A} \approx \boxed{21.4\ \text{mA}}. The germanium diode passes slightly more current because it "steals" less of the supply — a direct consequence of its lower knee voltage.

Board level — sizing the series resistor (CBSE and A-Level pattern)

A silicon diode must run at 10 mA10\ \text{mA} from a 6.0 V6.0\ \text{V} supply. What series resistance is required?

Step 1. By KVL the resistor must drop everything the diode does not: VR=VS−Vγ=6.0−0.7=5.3 VV_R = V_S - V_\gamma = 6.0 - 0.7 = 5.3\ \text{V}.

Step 2. Ohm's law for the required current: R=VR/I=5.3/0.010=530 ΩR = V_R/I = 5.3/0.010 = \boxed{530\ \Omega}.

Step 3. A quick sanity check: use the nearest standard value (560 Ω560\ \Omega) and the current becomes 5.3/560=9.5 mA5.3/560 = 9.5\ \text{mA} — close, and safely on the low side. This is exactly how you choose the resistor for an LED, which is just a diode with a higher knee (treated in the special-diodes article).

Competitive level — the Shockley equation, forward and reverse (JEE Main and Advanced pattern)

A silicon diode has reverse saturation current I0=1.0 μAI_0 = 1.0\ \mu\text{A} and ideality factor n=1n = 1 at 300 K300\ \text{K}, where VT=0.026 VV_T = 0.026\ \text{V}. Using I=I0(eV/nVT−1)I = I_0\big(e^{V/nV_T}-1\big), find the current at (a) a forward bias V=+0.20 VV = +0.20\ \text{V} and (b) a reverse bias V=−0.20 VV = -0.20\ \text{V}. (c) By how much must the forward voltage increase to raise the current tenfold?

Step 1. Forward. The exponent is V/VT=0.20/0.026=7.7V/V_T = 0.20/0.026 = 7.7, so e7.7≈2.2×103e^{7.7} \approx 2.2\times10^{3}. Then I=1.0×10−6 (2.2×103−1)≈1.0×10−6×2.19×103=2.19×10−3 A≈2.2 mAI = 1.0\times10^{-6}\,(2.2\times10^{3} - 1) \approx 1.0\times10^{-6}\times2.19\times10^{3} = 2.19\times10^{-3}\ \text{A} \approx \boxed{2.2\ \text{mA}}. From 1 μA1\ \mu\text{A} of saturation to milliamps: the exponential in action.

Step 2. Reverse. Now V/VT=−7.7V/V_T = -7.7, so e−7.7=4.6×10−4e^{-7.7} = 4.6\times10^{-4}, essentially zero. Then I=1.0×10−6 (4.6×10−4−1)≈−1.0×10−6 A=−1.0 μAI = 1.0\times10^{-6}\,(4.6\times10^{-4} - 1) \approx -1.0\times10^{-6}\ \text{A} = \boxed{-1.0\ \mu\text{A}} — the current saturates at −I0-I_0, independent of how hard we reverse bias. This is the flat reverse plateau.

Step 3. Tenfold rise. To multiply II by 1010 we need eΔV/VT=10e^{\Delta V/V_T} = 10, so ΔV=VTln⁡10=0.026×2.303=0.0599 V≈60 mV\Delta V = V_T\ln 10 = 0.026\times2.303 = 0.0599\ \text{V} \approx \boxed{60\ \text{mV}}. This famous "60 mV60\ \text{mV} per decade" is why the forward curve looks vertical: a factor of 10001000 in current costs only about 180 mV180\ \text{mV}. Timing note: about two minutes. The only real work is one exponential; keep VT=0.026 VV_T = 0.026\ \text{V} memorised so V/VTV/V_T is a single division. Recognising that reverse bias forces I→−I0I \to -I_0 by inspection (the exponential dies) saves the whole of part (b), and the "60 mV60\ \text{mV} per decade" rule is worth carrying as a standard result — it turns part (c) into one line.

Competitive level — static and dynamic resistance (NEET and JEE pattern)

From a silicon diode's forward characteristic, the current is 30 mA30\ \text{mA} at 0.75 V0.75\ \text{V}, and it rises from 20 mA20\ \text{mA} to 40 mA40\ \text{mA} as the voltage goes from 0.73 V0.73\ \text{V} to 0.77 V0.77\ \text{V}. Find (a) the static (DC) resistance at 0.75 V0.75\ \text{V} and (b) the dynamic (AC) resistance there.

Step 1. Static resistance is simply voltage over current at the point: Rdc=V/I=0.75/0.030=25 ΩR_{dc} = V/I = 0.75/0.030 = \boxed{25\ \Omega}.

Step 2. Dynamic resistance is the change in voltage over the change in current across the point: ΔV=0.77−0.73=0.04 V\Delta V = 0.77 - 0.73 = 0.04\ \text{V}, ΔI=40−20=20 mA=0.020 A\Delta I = 40 - 20 = 20\ \text{mA} = 0.020\ \text{A}. So rd=ΔV/ΔI=0.04/0.020=2 Ωr_d = \Delta V/\Delta I = 0.04/0.020 = \boxed{2\ \Omega}.

Step 3. The dynamic resistance (2 Ω2\ \Omega) is about a twelfth of the static (25 Ω25\ \Omega) — the hallmark of the steep exponential. Cross-check with the quoted rd=VT/I=0.026/0.030=0.87 Ωr_d = V_T/I = 0.026/0.030 = 0.87\ \Omega: the same order of magnitude, the difference coming from the finite step size and a real diode's series resistance. Answers: Rdc=25 ΩR_{dc} = 25\ \Omega, rd=2 Ωr_d = 2\ \Omega. Timing note: under a minute. Do not confuse the two — static uses the point (V/I)(V/I), dynamic uses the interval (ΔV/ΔI)(\Delta V/\Delta I). Read which the question wants: "resistance of the diode" usually means static; "resistance to a small signal" or "AC resistance" means dynamic.

Exam traps

Confusing static and dynamic resistance. V/IV/I (static) and ΔV/ΔI\Delta V/\Delta I (dynamic) give very different numbers because the curve is not a straight line through the origin. JEE and NEET items exploit this constantly; read whether the question wants the resistance at a point or to a small change.

Using the wrong knee value. Silicon is 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}, germanium 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V} — mixing them up shifts every current answer. State which material you are using and subtract its knee. Most modern diodes are silicon unless told otherwise.

Treating reverse current as exactly zero. It is the small saturation current I0I_0, not zero, and it doubles roughly every 10 ∘C10\ ^\circ\text{C}. On a "is it forward or reverse biased, find the current" question, reverse bias means "≈I0\approx I_0, essentially off," not "no current at all."

Forgetting the diode drop in the loop. In a series circuit the diode eats 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} (Si) before the resistor gets anything: I=(VS−Vγ)/RI = (V_S - V_\gamma)/R, not VS/RV_S/R. Dropping the 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} is the single most common numerical slip.

Calling the 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} a source. The diode drop is a fall in potential in the direction of current, absorbing energy, never a battery that can drive current on its own.

Board scope. The qualitative diode — one-way conduction, forward/reverse bias, the I–V shape, the knee, the idea of breakdown — is core on CBSE, ICSE (ISC), JEE Main, JEE Advanced, NEET, IGCSE 0625, and A-Level 9702. The quantitative tools split by board: constant-drop for JEE, NEET, and A-Level 9702, dynamic resistance for JEE and NEET, but the exponential diode equation with VTV_T for JEE only — CIE 9702 stays qualitative. IGCSE keeps it purely qualitative (recognise the symbol, know it conducts one way, sketch the characteristic — no VTV_T, no Shockley equation). AP Physics 2 does not carry semiconductor electronics at all, so it is not listed. Answer an IGCSE question in words and a sketch; save the exponential for the competitive boards.

Origins · 1 minWilliam Shockley and how this was discovered
WS
William Shockley
1910–1989 · London and Bell Labs and Stanford

William Shockley was the American physicist who turned the p–n junction from a curiosity into a theory you could calculate with. As the leader of the Bell Labs group, he was not a co-inventor of Bardeen and Brattain's December 1947 point-contact transistor — and, stung at having missed it, went on alone to work out the physics of the junction devices. His 1949 paper on p–n junctions and junction transistors gave the diode its exponential current–voltage law, equation (1) here, and laid the foundation for all bipolar electronics; the three men shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics. In 1956 he moved to California and founded Shockley Semiconductor, whose departing "traitorous eight" seeded Fairchild and, through it, Silicon Valley. His later career was marred by discredited and widely condemned views on race, which isolated him scientifically.

History
1874
— Karl Ferdinand Braun discovers that a metal point on a galena crystal conducts one way, the first solid-state rectifier.
1904
— John Ambrose Fleming patents the thermionic vacuum-tube diode, the first deliberate rectifier device.
1940
— Russell Ohl finds the silicon p–n junction at Bell Labs and its rectifying and photovoltaic action.
1947
— Bardeen and Brattain demonstrate the point-contact transistor, opening the semiconductor era.
1949
— William Shockley publishes the theory of the p–n junction diode, giving its exponential I–V equation.
1954
— Gordon Teal makes the first commercial silicon diodes and transistors, and silicon overtakes germanium.

Going further

Texts. NCERT Physics Class 12, Chapter 14 ("Semiconductor Electronics"), the junction-diode and I–V-characteristic sections · H. C. Verma, Concepts of Physics Vol. 2, "Semiconductors and Semiconductor Devices" · Boylestad & Nashelsky, Electronic Devices and Circuit Theory, for the load line and diode models · Sedra & Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, for the Shockley equation done properly.

Provenance. Constants and anchors from the lane spec: VT=kT/e=8.617×10−5×300/1≈0.026 VV_T = kT/e = 8.617\times10^{-5}\times300/1 \approx 0.026\ \text{V}; Si knee 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}, Ge knee 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V}. Recompute: constant-drop currents (5−0.7)/1000=4.3 mA(5-0.7)/1000 = 4.3\ \text{mA} and (5−0.3)/1000=4.7 mA(5-0.3)/1000 = 4.7\ \text{mA}; example currents (5−0.7)/220=19.5 mA(5-0.7)/220 = 19.5\ \text{mA}, (5−0.3)/220=21.4 mA(5-0.3)/220 = 21.4\ \text{mA}; resistor sizing (6−0.7)/0.010=530 Ω(6-0.7)/0.010 = 530\ \Omega; static 0.72/0.015=48 Ω0.72/0.015 = 48\ \Omega and 0.75/0.030=25 Ω0.75/0.030 = 25\ \Omega; dynamic 0.02/0.010=2 Ω0.02/0.010 = 2\ \Omega and 0.04/0.020=2 Ω0.04/0.020 = 2\ \Omega; quoted rd=VT/Ir_d = V_T/I giving 0.026/0.015=1.7 Ω0.026/0.015 = 1.7\ \Omega and 0.026/0.030=0.87 Ω0.026/0.030 = 0.87\ \Omega; Shockley equation at V=±0.20 VV=\pm0.20\ \text{V} with I0=1 μAI_0 = 1\ \mu\text{A}, VT=0.026 VV_T=0.026\ \text{V}: forward ≈2.2 mA\approx 2.2\ \text{mA}, reverse ≈−1.0 μA\approx -1.0\ \mu\text{A}; decade step VTln⁡10=0.060 VV_T\ln 10 = 0.060\ \text{V}. All in verify_hs2-diode-iv-characteristics.py.

Prerequisites. The p–n Junction — the depletion region, barrier potential, and diffusion-versus-drift equilibrium that this article puts a battery across. Everything here is that junction, biased. Leads to. Rectifiers: Half-Wave & Full-Wave, which chains diodes to turn AC into DC using exactly the one-way conduction established here. For the exponential law derived from carrier statistics rather than quoted, the university seam on semiconductor diode lasers and junction device physics treats the Shockley equation, Fermi–Dirac occupation, and carrier diffusion in full (a go-deeper pointer, never an exam dependency here).

Why is the knee about 0.7 V for silicon and 0.3 V for germanium?

Because the knee voltage is essentially the junction's built-in barrier potential, and that barrier is set by the material's energy gap. Silicon's larger band gap (1.1 eV1.1\ \text{eV}) produces a taller barrier (about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}) that a forward bias must cancel before carriers flood across; germanium's smaller gap (0.7 eV0.7\ \text{eV}) gives a shorter barrier (about 0.3 V0.3\ \text{V}), so it turns on sooner. The knee is therefore not an arbitrary circuit number — it is the same barrier you calculated for the bare junction, now measured as the voltage where forward current becomes visible. This is also why germanium diodes, though largely obsolete, are still prized in low-voltage detectors where every tenth of a volt matters.

Is the diode's 0.7 V like a battery or like a resistor?

Neither, exactly — and that is the whole subtlety. It is not a battery: a battery can drive current through an external circuit on its own, but a diode does nothing until an outside source pushes current through it; the 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} appears only because current is flowing. It is not an ordinary resistor either: a resistor's voltage is proportional to current (V=IRV = IR), but the diode holds roughly 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} across a huge range of currents. The best model is a switch with a fixed drop: open below the knee, and above it a closed switch that happens to cost 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V}. For small changes around an operating point it does look resistive, with the small dynamic resistance rd=VT/Ir_d = V_T/I.

What is the difference between the knee, threshold, and barrier voltages?

They are three names circling the same physics. The barrier (or built-in) potential is the internal voltage step across the depletion region of the unbiased junction — the wall diffusion has to climb. The knee, cut-in, or threshold voltage is the external forward voltage at which the diode starts to conduct appreciably on its I–V curve. They are numerically almost equal (both about 0.7 V0.7\ \text{V} for silicon) because the applied voltage has to cancel the internal barrier before current flows — but conceptually one is a property of the junction alone and the other is a feature you read off the measured characteristic. Different textbooks use "knee," "cut-in," and "threshold" interchangeably; treat them as synonyms for the turn-on voltage.

Why isn't the reverse current exactly zero?

Because heat is always creating a few electron–hole pairs, even in the depletion region. Reverse bias sweeps out the majority carriers, but the minority carriers it generates thermally — electrons on the p-side, holes on the n-side — are pulled across by the strong reverse field, giving the small reverse saturation current I0I_0. It is called "saturation" because it depends on how fast heat makes those carriers, not on the voltage, so it stays almost constant as you increase the reverse bias. In silicon I0I_0 is nanoamps, in germanium microamps, and it roughly doubles every 10 ∘C10\ ^\circ\text{C}. That temperature sensitivity — not the (tiny) size of I0I_0 itself — is why it matters in precise or hot circuits.

What actually happens at reverse breakdown, and does it wreck the diode?

At a large enough reverse voltage the thin, high-field depletion region either rips bound electrons straight out of their bonds (Zener breakdown, in heavily doped junctions) or accelerates the few free carriers hard enough to knock loose an avalanche of others (avalanche breakdown, in lightly doped ones). Either way the reverse current rises very steeply while the voltage barely changes. For an ordinary rectifier diode this is destructive — the current runs away and the heat melts the junction unless the circuit limits it. But a diode designed for it, run with a series resistor to cap the current, survives happily and clamps a constant voltage: that is the Zener regulator, a whole article of its own. Breakdown is a failure mode for one diode and the operating principle of another.

Where does the exponential in the diode equation come from?

From the statistics of carriers climbing the barrier. At temperature TT, the fraction of electrons and holes with enough thermal energy to surmount a potential barrier of height eVbeV_b follows a Boltzmann factor e−eVb/kTe^{-eV_b/kT} — the same exponential that governs any thermally activated process. Forward bias lowers the barrier by the applied eVeV, which multiplies the number of carriers able to cross by eeV/kT=eV/VTe^{eV/kT} = e^{V/V_T}, and their current with it. That is why doubling nothing much in voltage multiplies the current so violently. Turning that idea into the exact equation I=I0(eV/nVT−1)I = I_0(e^{V/nV_T}-1) needs the full Fermi–Dirac carrier statistics and the diffusion of carriers across the junction — genuinely university-level — so a school course quotes the result and uses its shape, which is all the problems require.

How does temperature change the whole characteristic?

Two ways, in opposite directions, both because heat makes more carriers. First, the reverse saturation current I0I_0 climbs steeply — roughly doubling every 10 ∘C10\ ^\circ\text{C} — so the reverse "off" leakage grows and can matter in hot circuits. Second, the forward knee falls: for silicon the cut-in voltage drops by about 2 mV2\ \text{mV} per degree Celsius, because a hotter junction needs less help to get carriers over the barrier. This is why a diode's forward drop is used as a cheap temperature sensor, and why power circuits must guard against "thermal runaway" — a hotter diode conducts more, which heats it further.

Before this

Where this leads