Ellipse axes and focus relationship
Draw an ellipse and you can measure three lengths on it: how far it stretches along its long axis (the semi-major axis ), how far along its short axis (the semi-minor axis ), and how far each focus sits from the centre (the focal distance ). These are not independent choices — fix any two and the third is forced, by the single relation . This section isolates that relation: where it comes from, what it says about the shape of the ellipse, and how to use it to move between , , and the coordinates of vertices and foci. It builds directly on the standard equation of the ellipse from Class 11 Coordinate Geometry, Conic Sections, and every number here can be checked with nothing more than Pythagoras.
For the ellipse , the semi-major axis , semi-minor axis , and focal distance always satisfy , a right-triangle fact hiding inside the ellipse's equation.
The core idea
Take the standard ellipse with , so the major axis lies along the -axis.
- The semi-major axis is half the longer axis. The vertices sit at and the full major axis has length .
- The semi-minor axis is half the shorter axis, perpendicular to the major one. It ends at , and the full minor axis has length .
- The focal distance is how far each focus sits from the centre, with the two foci at .
These three are locked together:
where: is the semi-major axis, is the semi-minor axis, and is the distance from the centre to a focus, all measured in the same length unit. This is not an extra fact bolted on to the ellipse — it is baked into the equation. When the ellipse's equation is first derived from the constant-sum property , the quantity is defined as purely to make come out in that clean form. Because , it follows immediately that always; if the two foci merge at the centre and the ellipse becomes a circle. Push toward and the ellipse looks rounder; push toward and it flattens into a thin sliver, since in that limit. If instead the larger denominator sits under (so ), the major axis runs along the -axis, the foci sit at , and the relation flips to — same idea, larger semi-axis renamed. It helps to think of , and as three lengths tied by one constraint rather than three free numbers: fixing any two pins down the third, and every question in this topic is really just asking you to run that one relation in whichever direction the given information demands.
Look at the point , the top of the minor axis, together with the two foci and . By the symmetry of the ellipse, , and this pair of equal focal distances together with the triangle (right-angled at the centre ) is exactly what the derivation below turns into the boxed relation.
The goal of this derivation is to obtain the exact relation linking the semi-major axis, the semi-minor axis and the focal distance of an ellipse, starting only from the defining constant-sum property that every point on the ellipse has focal distances summing to , and using the specific point where the ellipse crosses its minor axis to turn that property into a clean statement about lengths.
Step 1. Set up coordinates with the centre at the origin, foci at and , and major axis along the -axis. Every point on the ellipse satisfies , the defining property used to derive the ellipse's equation.
Step 2. Apply this at the special point , where the ellipse meets the positive -axis (the top of the minor axis). By symmetry about the -axis, is equidistant from the two foci, so . Combined with , this forces .
Step 3. Compute directly by the distance formula. . Since Step 2 showed , this gives .
Step 4. Square both sides to remove the root: , which rearranges to . This is exactly the boxed relation, now justified from first principles rather than asserted, and it matches the algebraic route where is defined as while deriving the ellipse's standard equation.
Worked example
Problem. An ellipse has semi-major axis and semi-minor axis , with its major axis along the -axis. Find the coordinates of its foci, and verify the result using the right triangle.
Step 1. Identify the given lengths: , .
Step 2. Apply the relation: .
Step 3. Take the square root: .
Step 4. Since the major axis is along the -axis, the foci lie at . Answer: foci at and .
Step 5. Check via Pythagoras: , confirming the right-triangle relation holds for these values.
Competitive stretch
An ellipse with major axis along the -axis has foci at and semi-major axis . Here the roles swap: the semi-major length is (paired with ) and , so , giving . The equation is , and the check confirms it again — the same relation, applied with and 's geometric roles (not their algebraic denominators) tracked carefully. Notice that both worked examples used the identical three-step chain — read off two of , , from the question, apply in whichever direction is needed, and verify with the Pythagoras check — which is exactly the pattern to drill until it is automatic.
Common traps
- Writing , the hyperbola relation, instead of for the ellipse — the sign is the single most common slip between the two conics.
- Forgetting that always denotes the larger of the two axis semi-lengths, regardless of whether it is paired with or in the equation.
- Assuming can equal or exceed — for a real ellipse always, since requires .
- Placing the foci on the minor axis by mistake — the foci always lie on the major axis, never the minor one.
- Skipping the Pythagoras check after computing — plugging the answer back into takes a few seconds and catches almost every arithmetic slip in an exam.
Ask the tutor: Want to see how this same right-triangle relation reappears when we compute an ellipse's eccentricity, or when we compare it to the hyperbola's focus relation?
Why is it c squared equals a squared minus b squared for an ellipse but c squared equals a squared plus b squared for a hyperbola?
It comes down to which sum or difference stays constant. For an ellipse, the sum of focal distances is fixed, , and working through the algebra makes appear naturally, so ends up bigger than both and . For a hyperbola, it is the difference of focal distances that stays fixed, and that sign flip in the defining property flips the sign in the relation too, giving with the largest of the three. Same triangle idea, opposite starting property.
How do I know which axis is major if the equation just shows two denominators?
Compare the two denominators under and : whichever is larger is , and that variable's axis is the major axis. For example in , , so sits under , meaning the major axis is along the -axis and the foci are at , not . Never assume automatically pairs with the major axis — check the numbers.
Can I use this relation if I am only given the foci and one vertex, without being told a or b directly?
Yes — the coordinates already hand you and directly. A vertex on the major axis is at distance from the centre, and a focus is at distance from the centre, so you read both off the given points, then solve for the missing semi-minor axis. This is exactly the pattern in the competitive stretch example above: foci gave , the stated semi-major axis gave , and the relation supplied .