Ellipse standard equation
Take a piece of string, pin its two ends to a board at two fixed points, and trace a pencil around while keeping the string taut. The curve you draw is an ellipse — the set of every point whose distances from those two pins always add up to the same total, the length of the string. Those pins are the ellipse's foci, and that single constant-sum property is enough to generate the whole shape, from planetary orbits to the elliptical arches used in architecture. Turning that string-and-pins picture into algebra is the goal of this section. Starting from the definition , we place the foci symmetrically on the -axis, write the sum-of-distances condition in coordinates, and simplify by squaring twice until the messy square roots collapse into the clean standard form . Along the way we meet the relation linking the semi-major axis , the semi-minor axis , and the focal distance , and we learn to read off an ellipse's foci, vertices, and axis lengths directly from its equation — skills tested repeatedly in CBSE Class 11 coordinate geometry.
An ellipse is the locus of points whose distances from two fixed foci sum to a constant , and squaring the coordinate form of that condition twice yields the standard equation with tying the foci to the axes.
The core idea
The defining property. An ellipse is the locus of a point such that the sum of its distances from two fixed points and , the foci, stays constant. Call that constant sum , where must be greater than the distance between the foci for the locus to be a real, closed curve rather than empty.
Placing coordinates conveniently. Put the centre of the ellipse at the origin and the foci on the -axis at and , symmetric about the origin. This symmetry is a choice, not a law of nature — it is what turns the algebra into something manageable. For any point on the locus:
where: are the coordinates of a general point on the ellipse, is the distance from the centre to each focus, and is the constant sum of distances fixed by the string length.
From two square roots to one clean equation. Isolating one radical and squaring twice, as carried out in full in the derivation below, eliminates both square roots and leaves an equation in and alone. Writing (valid since for a real ellipse) turns that equation into the standard form
where: is the semi-major axis length, is the semi-minor axis length, and the constraint is a labelling convention — whichever axis is longer is always called , regardless of whether it lies along or .
Reading off the parts. For with : the major axis lies along the -axis with length and vertices ; the minor axis lies along the -axis with length and endpoints ; and the foci sit at with . If instead , every role of and swaps: the major axis runs along the -axis, vertices are , and foci are with .
Starting from the coordinate statement of the sum-of-distances property, , carry out the algebra of isolating and squaring each square root in turn so that the two radicals cancel out and only a polynomial relation between , , , and remains, then substitute to reach the boxed standard form used throughout this section.
Step 1. Isolate one radical: .
Step 2. Square both sides. The left side becomes , and the right side becomes . The terms appear on both sides and cancel, along with the terms combining, leaving , which simplifies to .
Step 3. Square once more: . Expanding both sides gives . The terms cancel from each side, leaving , i.e. .
Step 4. Divide both sides by to get . Since for a genuine ellipse, is a positive quantity; define so that .
Step 5. Substituting gives the standard equation , and rearranging the definition of gives the key relation used throughout this topic, , i.e. .
Worked example
Problem. Find the equation of the ellipse with foci and vertices , then verify the sum-of-distances property at a vertex.
Step 1. The vertices are at , so and .
Step 2. The foci are at , so .
Step 3. Using .
Step 4. Substitute and into the standard form to get the equation of the ellipse: .
Step 5 (verification). At the vertex , the distance to focus is and the distance to focus is , and their sum is , confirming as required by the defining property.
Competitive stretch
Reverse the labelling: for , compare denominators — , so the major axis is along the -axis, giving , , , , and . The foci are at and the vertices at , with major axis length and minor axis length — a reminder that always names the semi-major axis, whichever coordinate it multiplies.
Common traps
- Assuming the larger denominator always sits under — it does not; compare the two denominators and call the larger one , whichever axis it belongs to.
- Confusing the ellipse relation with the hyperbola's — the minus sign here reflects that for a real ellipse.
- Treating as meaning "'s denominator is bigger" rather than a naming convention for whichever axis is longer.
- Forgetting to take the positive square root when solving , or mixing up which of , , was given in a problem.
Ask the tutor: want to see how this same squaring method changes when the foci are placed on the y-axis instead, or how eccentricity connects back to , , ?
Why do we place the foci on the x-axis instead of somewhere general
Placing the foci symmetrically on the -axis at is purely a convenience of coordinate choice, not a restriction on ellipses in general. Any ellipse can be moved and rotated so its centre sits at the origin and its axes align with the coordinate axes; doing so turns the algebra of the derivation into a manageable sequence of squarings. An ellipse centred elsewhere or tilted would have the same shape but a messier equation, which is why the standard, axis-aligned form is the one CBSE Class 11 focuses on.
How do I quickly tell whether the major axis is along x or y just by looking at the equation
Compare the two denominators in . Whichever denominator is larger names , and the major axis runs along that variable's axis. If , the major axis is along and foci are at ; if , the major axis is along and foci are at . Either way, .
Is the relation c squared equals a squared minus b squared always true for any ellipse
Yes, for every ellipse in standard position this relation holds, because it comes directly from the substitution made during the derivation, and is always defined as the semi-major axis while is the semi-minor axis. It is worth memorising alongside the standard equation itself, since most problems give you two of , , and expect you to find the third using this exact relation.