Trigonometric functions of sum and difference
is not one of the "standard" values drilled into every student — it is not , , or . Yet it can be found exactly, without a calculator, the moment you notice and have a formula for in terms of . That formula, and its five companions for , and , are the compound-angle formulae — the single most useful toolkit in the CBSE Class 11 trigonometry chapter. Every multiple-angle identity (, , …), every sum-to-product conversion, and most identity-proving problems in the chapter are built by applying one of these six formulae cleverly, sometimes more than once. Master the six formulae and the substitution habit that goes with them, and the rest of the chapter becomes bookkeeping. This sits right after the unit-circle and quadrant-sign rules of the chapter, and everything that follows — multiple-angle formulae, sum-to-product conversions, identity proofs — leans on these six results.
The sine, cosine and tangent of a sum or difference of two angles expand into products and sums of the sine and cosine of the individual angles — most memorably and — and every multiple-angle and sum-to-product identity in the chapter is a direct consequence of these six formulae.
The core idea
Six compound-angle formulae. For all real (with tangent/cotangent versions valid wherever the denominator is non-zero):
where: are the two angles being combined (in degrees or radians), and the tangent formulae require . Notice the sign "swap" between the sine and cosine rules — has a plus sign in the middle, but has a minus — this is the single most common slip in the whole chapter.
Multiple-angle identities fall out immediately by setting :
where: the three forms of are algebraically identical (using ), and you pick whichever form matches the rest of a problem — all-, all-, or mixed. Applying and the same way gives and .
Sum-to-product identities come from a substitution trick: set , , so and , then feed these back into the compound-angle formulae:
where: are any two angles whose sine or cosine is being added or subtracted; the trick of deriving these from the six basic formulae (rather than memorising them separately) is what keeps them straight under exam pressure.
The goal is to show that the tangent addition formula is not a separate fact to memorise but a direct algebraic consequence of the sine and cosine addition formulae, divided through and rearranged so that only tangents of the individual angles appear on the right-hand side — a manipulation every student should be able to reproduce from scratch under exam conditions rather than recall by rote.
Step 1. Start from the definition and substitute the two compound-angle formulae already established: \tan(x+y) = \frac{\sin x\cos y+\cos x\sin y}{\cos x\cos y-\sin x\sin y}.
Step 2. Divide every term in the numerator and denominator by (valid whenever ), so that each fraction reduces to a tangent: \tan(x+y) = \frac{\dfrac{\sin x\cos y}{\cos x\cos y}+\dfrac{\cos x\sin y}{\cos x\cos y}}{\dfrac{\cos x\cos y}{\cos x\cos y}-\dfrac{\sin x\sin y}{\cos x\cos y}}.
Step 3. Simplify each of the four fractions: the numerator becomes , and the denominator becomes , giving \tan(x+y) = \frac{\tan x+\tan y}{1-\tan x\tan y}.
Step 4. Note the restriction this division introduces: the formula breaks down whenever , i.e. whenever , quite apart from any restriction on or individually — this is exactly the trap flagged below. Replacing by throughout (using ) gives the difference formula for free.
Worked example
Problem. Find the exact value of , then use it to find .
Step 1. Write as a sum of standard angles: .
Step 2. Apply with , : \sin75^\circ = \sin45^\circ\cos30^\circ+\cos45^\circ\sin30^\circ = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\cdot\frac{\sqrt3}{2}+\frac{1}{\sqrt2}\cdot\frac12 = \frac{\sqrt3+1}{2\sqrt2}.
Step 3. Rationalise by multiplying by : \sin75^\circ = \frac{\sqrt2(\sqrt3+1)}{4} = \frac{\sqrt6+\sqrt2}{4}.
Step 4. For , use the co-function identity , so \cos15^\circ = \frac{\sqrt6+\sqrt2}{4}.
Final answer: and .
Competitive stretch
Prove . Expand both terms with the compound-angle cosine formula: and ; the terms cancel on adding, leaving , as required. The same result drops out instantly from the sum-to-product identity with , — the two routes are the same identity used two ways.
Common traps
- Mixing up the sign in the cosine formulae. has a minus between the two products while has a plus — the reverse of what intuition suggests.
- Forgetting the domain restriction on tangent addition. is undefined whenever , independent of any restriction on or alone.
- Memorising sum-to-product formulae in isolation instead of deriving them from the compound-angle formulae via — this makes it easy to mismatch which formula goes with vs and vs .
- Picking the wrong form of . All three forms (, , ) are equally correct; choosing the one matching the rest of the expression saves algebra.
Ask the tutor: want a walkthrough of deriving the compound-angle formulae from the unit circle, or more identity-proving practice with non-standard angles?
Why does the cosine addition formula have a minus sign when sine has a plus?
It comes straight out of the geometry of rotating a point on the unit circle by an angle after already being at angle — the -coordinate (cosine) picks up a subtraction because rotating "uses up" some of the cosine to generate the extra sine contribution, while the -coordinate (sine) only adds. There is no shortcut to remembering this beyond drilling the pattern: sine keeps the same sign as the angle combination, cosine flips it. Writing out and side by side a few times fixes the swap permanently.
Do I need to memorise all six compound-angle formulae separately?
Not really — memorise the sine and cosine addition formulae solidly, and derive everything else from them on the spot. The subtraction formulae follow by replacing with (using , ); the tangent formulae follow by dividing sine by cosine, as shown in the derivation above. Rebuilding tan(x+y) from scratch in an exam takes under a minute once the pattern is internalised, and it is safer than misremembering a sign under pressure.
How do I know whether to use the compound-angle formula or the sum-to-product formula in an identity-proving question?
Use the compound-angle formulae when the expression already has angles written as a sum or difference, like , that you need to expand outward into separate sines and cosines. Use the sum-to-product formulae when you instead have two separate trigonometric terms, like , that you want to collapse inward into a single product — often because a product is easier to cancel against another factor in the identity. Since the second set is derived from the first, if you are ever unsure which to apply, expanding with the compound-angle formulae directly is always a safe fallback.