Irrational numbers

Write down 13\dfrac13 and its digits settle into a repeating block, 0.333…0.333\ldots, forever. Write down 2\sqrt2 and no such pattern ever appears — its digits run on, 1.41421356…1.41421356\ldots, without ever locking into a repeating cycle. That single difference splits every real number into two camps: rational, expressible as a fraction of integers, and irrational, which cannot be. This article stays inside the Class 9 picture — recognising irrational numbers from their decimals, combining them with rationals, and placing numbers like 2\sqrt2 and 3\sqrt3 exactly on the number line using a right-triangle construction. The formal contradiction-style proof that 2\sqrt2 is irrational is Class 10 territory; here the emphasis is the decimal test and the geometric picture, both of which the CBSE Class 9 syllabus asks you to master.

The core insight

A number is irrational exactly when its decimal expansion is non-terminating and non-recurring, and every such number still has one exact point on the number line, reachable for numbers like 2\sqrt2 and 3\sqrt3 by a right-triangle (Pythagorean) construction.

The core idea

Two kinds of decimals, two kinds of numbers. A rational number pq\dfrac{p}{q} (p,qp, q integers, q≠0q \neq 0) always produces a decimal that either terminates (like 14=0.25\dfrac14 = 0.25) or is non-terminating but recurring, repeating some block of digits forever (like 13=0.333…\dfrac13 = 0.333\ldots or 227=3.142857‾\dfrac{22}{7} = 3.\overline{142857}). An irrational number is the opposite of both: a real number whose decimal expansion is non-terminating and non-recurring — it never ends, and no block of digits ever repeats indefinitely. Familiar examples:

2=1.41421356…,3=1.7320508…,π=3.14159265…\sqrt2 = 1.41421356\ldots, \qquad \sqrt3 = 1.7320508\ldots, \qquad \pi = 3.14159265\ldots

where: each right-hand side is a decimal that continues forever with no repeating pattern, which is precisely the test for irrationality.

Rationals and irrationals share the number line. Every point on the number line stands for exactly one real number, and every real number — rational or irrational — has exactly one point. Together the two sets fill the line with no gaps, forming the set of real numbers. This matters because it tells you irrational numbers are not some abstract leftover; 2\sqrt2 sits at a definite, locatable spot between 1.41.4 and 1.51.5.

Combining rationals with irrationals. If aa is rational (and nonzero where needed) and bb is irrational, then a+ba+b, a−ba-b, abab, and ab\dfrac{a}{b} are all irrational. But combining two irrationals can land back on a rational number — for instance (2+3)+(2−3)=4(2+\sqrt3)+(2-\sqrt3) = 4, and 2×2=2\sqrt2 \times \sqrt2 = 2. So "irrational plus irrational" is not automatically irrational; only "rational (nonzero) combined with irrational" is guaranteed irrational.

Locating irrationals geometrically. Since 2\sqrt2 is the length of the diagonal of a unit square (12+12=21^2+1^2=2), a right triangle with both legs of length 11 has a hypotenuse of exactly 2\sqrt2. Swinging that hypotenuse onto the number line with a compass marks 2\sqrt2's exact position — no measuring tape, no approximation.

Why "non-terminating and non-recurring" is the right test. It helps to see why every rational number must terminate or recur in the first place. Long division of pp by qq can only ever produce remainders from the list 0,1,2,…,q−10, 1, 2, \ldots, q-1 — finitely many possibilities. If a remainder 00 ever turns up, the division stops and the decimal terminates. If it never turns up, some remainder must eventually repeat (there are only q−1q-1 nonzero remainders to choose from), and once a remainder repeats, the digits that follow it repeat too, forever. An irrational number's decimal never falls into either trap: no remainder cycle exists because there is no fraction pq\dfrac{p}{q} generating it at all. This is the deeper reason the decimal test works, not just a rule to memorise.

Figure
A right triangle with legs one and one and hypotenuse root two swung by compass onto the number line
Locating root two on the number line O (0) A (1) 2 1 B root 2 P (root 2) Arc of radius OB, centred at O, meets the line at P — the exact point root two
Derivation ALocating root two with a right-triangle construction

The goal is to show, using nothing beyond the Pythagorean relation a Class 9 student already knows, that the length 2\sqrt2 has one exact, constructible point on the number line — not an approximation but a geometrically guaranteed position, obtained by building a right triangle with unit legs and transferring its hypotenuse onto the line with a compass.

Step 1. Draw a number line and mark OO at 00 and AA at 11, so OA=1OA = 1 unit.

Step 2. At AA, draw a segment ABAB of length 11 unit perpendicular to the number line, so AB⊥OAAB \perp OA and AB=1AB = 1.

Step 3. Join OO to BB. Triangle OABOAB is right-angled at AA, so by the Pythagorean relation:

OB2=OA2+AB2=12+12=2  ⟹  OB=2OB^2 = OA^2 + AB^2 = 1^2 + 1^2 = 2 \implies OB = \sqrt2

where: OAOA and ABAB are the two legs (each 11 unit) and OBOB is the hypotenuse, whose length works out to exactly 2\sqrt2.

Step 4. With centre OO and radius OBOB, draw an arc that cuts the number line on the positive side. Call the point where the arc meets the line PP. Since the arc has radius OB=2OB = \sqrt2 and is centred at OO (which sits at 00), the point PP is at distance 2\sqrt2 from OO — so PP represents the number 2\sqrt2 exactly. This "spiral of Theodorus" idea extends further: erecting another unit perpendicular at PP and joining back to OO gives a segment of length 3\sqrt3 (since OP2+12=2+1=3OP^2 + 1^2 = 2+1 = 3), letting the construction locate 2,3,4,…\sqrt2, \sqrt3, \sqrt4, \ldots one after another.

Worked example

Classify each number as rational or irrational, with a reason: (a) 0.10110111011110…0.10110111011110\ldots, (b) 9\sqrt9, (c) 2+52+\sqrt5, (d) 227\dfrac{22}{7}.

Step 1. Check (a). The decimal 0.10110111011110…0.10110111011110\ldots is built with a growing pattern (one more 11 each block), but the digits themselves never settle into a fixed repeating block — it is non-terminating and non-recurring. So it is irrational.

Step 2. Check (b). 9=3=31\sqrt9 = 3 = \dfrac31, a ratio of integers, so it is rational. This confirms that the square root of a perfect square is always rational, not automatically irrational.

Step 3. Check (c). Here 22 is rational and 5\sqrt5 is irrational; since a nonzero rational combined with an irrational (by addition here) is always irrational, 2+52+\sqrt5 is irrational — its decimal, approximately 4.2360679…4.2360679\ldots, never terminates or repeats.

Step 4. Check (d). 227=3.142857142857…\dfrac{22}{7} = 3.142857142857\ldots is non-terminating, but the block "142857142857" recurs forever, so it is a repeating decimal and hence rational. Note this is only an approximation to π\pi; π\pi itself is irrational.

Answer: (a) irrational, (b) rational, (c) irrational, (d) rational.

Competitive stretch

Locate 3\sqrt3 on the number line, starting from the point PP representing 2\sqrt2 found in the derivation above.

Step 1. At PP (which is at distance 2\sqrt2 from OO), draw a segment PQPQ of length 11 unit, perpendicular to the number line.

Step 2. Join OO to QQ. Since OP=2OP = \sqrt2 and PQ=1PQ = 1 with a right angle at PP, the Pythagorean relation gives OQ2=OP2+PQ2=(2)2+12=2+1=3OQ^2 = OP^2 + PQ^2 = (\sqrt2)^2 + 1^2 = 2+1 = 3, so OQ=3OQ = \sqrt3.

Step 3. With centre OO and radius OQ=3OQ = \sqrt3, draw an arc cutting the number line at a point RR. Then RR represents 3\sqrt3 exactly. Answer: repeating the same right-triangle idea one level up, starting from the already-located 2\sqrt2, pins down 3\sqrt3 on the number line.

Common traps

  • Thinking 227\dfrac{22}{7} is π\pi — it is a rational approximation; the true value of π\pi is irrational and never equals 227\dfrac{22}{7} exactly.
  • Judging irrationality by how "complicated" a decimal looks. The only real test is whether the digits eventually repeat (rational) or never settle into a repeating block (irrational), regardless of how many digits are shown.
  • Assuming every square root is irrational. Only non-perfect squares like 2,3,5\sqrt2, \sqrt3, \sqrt5 are irrational; 4,9,16\sqrt4, \sqrt9, \sqrt{16} equal 2,3,42, 3, 4 and are rational.
  • Concluding two irrationals must combine to an irrational. Counterexamples: 2×2=2\sqrt2 \times \sqrt2 = 2 and (3+2)+(3−2)=6(3+\sqrt2)+(3-\sqrt2)=6, both rational.

Ask the tutor: Want to see why the compass-and-arc trick works for 5\sqrt5 or 7\sqrt7 too, or practise classifying more decimals as rational or irrational?

Why is 0.101101110111 something irrational when it clearly has a pattern?

Having a pattern in how it is built is not the same as being recurring. A recurring decimal repeats one fixed, finite block of digits forever, like 13=0.3‾\dfrac13 = 0.\overline{3}. In 0.10110111011110…0.10110111011110\ldots, the block of 11s between the zeros keeps growing (one 11, then two, then three...), so there is no fixed block that repeats. Since it never settles into a repeating cycle and never terminates, it satisfies the definition of irrational, pattern or not.

Is every square root irrational?

No. A square root is irrational only when the number under the root is not a perfect square. 4,9,16,25\sqrt4, \sqrt9, \sqrt{16}, \sqrt{25} equal 2,3,4,52, 3, 4, 5 exactly, so they are rational. But 2,3,5,7\sqrt2, \sqrt3, \sqrt5, \sqrt7 (and any non-perfect square) have decimal expansions that never terminate or repeat, so they are irrational. Always simplify the square root first before deciding.

Can I prove sqrt 2 is irrational in Class 9?

The Class 9 syllabus does not require the formal proof by contradiction — that is Class 10 content. In Class 9, you are expected to accept and use the fact that 2\sqrt2 is irrational (its decimal never terminates or repeats), and to be able to construct its exact position on the number line using the right-triangle method. The rigorous "assume 2=p/q\sqrt2 = p/q in lowest terms" argument comes later.

Before this

Where this leads