Torque-speed characteristics

Switch on a three-phase induction motor and it does not simply snap to full speed — it starts with a modest twist, accelerates, and settles onto a stable running point that shifts with load. The single picture that explains all of this is the torque–speed (equivalently, torque–slip) curve, built from one compact expression drawn from the motor's equivalent circuit: T∝sR2V12/(R22+(sX2)2)T \propto sR_2V_1^2/(R_2^2+(sX_2)^2). Reading this one formula at small slip, at large slip, and at the slip in between tells you the starting torque, the maximum (pull-out) torque the motor can ever deliver, and exactly which part of the curve is safe to load. This article expands the equivalent-circuit torque relation into the full shape of the curve, derives where the peak sits, and works two linked numeric examples so the qualitative picture and the numbers reinforce each other.

The core insight

The induction-motor torque relation T∝sR2V12/(R22+(sX2)2)T \propto sR_2V_1^2/(R_2^2+(sX_2)^2) rises with slip near synchronous speed, falls with slip near standstill, and peaks at smax=R2/X2s_{max}=R_2/X_2 — the pull-out point that separates the stable operating region from the unstable one.

The core idea

Every induction-motor torque–speed curve comes from one relation, obtained (at the level required here, without derivation) from the motor's equivalent circuit: torque is proportional to power delivered to the rotor-resistance branch, expressed per phase in terms of rotor resistance R2R_2, standstill rotor reactance X2X_2, supply/stator voltage V1V_1, and slip ss, all referred consistently to one side of the circuit.

T∝sR2V12R22+(sX2)2T \propto \frac{sR_2V_1^2}{R_2^2+(sX_2)^2}

where: ss is the fractional slip between synchronous speed and rotor speed (dimensionless, 00 at synchronous speed, 11 at standstill), R2R_2 and X2X_2 are the per-phase rotor resistance and standstill reactance, and V1V_1 is the applied per-phase voltage.

Two limiting regimes shape the curve. Near synchronous speed, slip is small, so (sX2)2(sX_2)^2 is negligible next to R22R_2^2 and the expression collapses to T∝sV12/R2T \propto sV_1^2/R_2 — torque grows roughly linearly with slip. This linear stretch is the motor's normal running region: as load increases, slip increases just enough to supply more torque. Near standstill, slip is close to 11 and (sX2)2(sX_2)^2 dominates R22R_2^2, so T∝V12/(sX22)T \propto V_1^2/(sX_2^2) — torque now falls as slip increases further toward 11. Between these two regimes the torque must pass through a maximum.

The peak is the pull-out torque. Differentiating the expression with respect to ss (carried out in the derivation below) shows the maximum occurs where the two terms of the denominator are equal, sX2=R2sX_2 = R_2, giving smax=R2/X2s_{max} = R_2/X_2, and the maximum torque value itself turns out to be independent of R2R_2. This peak is called the pull-out or breakdown torque — the largest torque the motor can develop at rated voltage. At s=1s=1 (standstill) the same formula gives the starting torque, generally well below pull-out.

The curve has a stable half and an unstable half. Plotting TT against slip from s=0s=0 (synchronous speed, zero torque, since zero slip means no induced rotor current) up through s=1s=1 traces a curve that rises to the pull-out peak and then falls back toward the starting-torque value. The region from s=0s=0 to smaxs_{max} is the stable operating region: here, torque increases with slip, so if load torque rises the motor slows slightly, slip increases, and the induction motor automatically supplies more torque to match — a self-correcting equilibrium. Beyond smaxs_{max}, torque decreases as slip increases further, so any extra load slows the motor further, which only lowers available torque — the motor cannot find a new balance and stalls. Practical machines are therefore always operated to the left of the pull-out point.

Voltage sensitivity. Because T∝V12T \propto V_1^2, torque is far more sensitive to supply voltage than to almost anything else in the equation — a fact with real consequences whenever supply voltage sags.

Figure
Torque against slip rising from a modest starting torque at slip one through the stable region to a peak pull out torque at an intermediate slip and falling to zero torque at zero slip
Torque versus slip — starting, stable region, pull-out, unstable region slip s (0 at synchronous speed, 1 at standstill) torque T 0 1 s_max = 0.2 pull-out torque starting torque stable region unstable region — loading here stalls the motor
Derivation AWhere pull-out torque occurs on the torque-slip curve

The goal is to show, starting from the syllabus torque relation T∝sR2V12/(R22+(sX2)2)T \propto sR_2V_1^2/(R_2^2+(sX_2)^2) and using ordinary calculus (a step the course quotes as a result without requiring the derivation, but which is instructive to see once), that torque is maximised exactly when sX2=R2sX_2 = R_2, giving the pull-out slip smax=R2/X2s_{max} = R_2/X_2 and a peak torque value that does not depend on R2R_2 at all.

Step 1. Drop the constant V12V_1^2 (it does not affect where the maximum occurs) and write torque as a function of slip alone: f(s)=sR2R22+s2X22f(s) = \dfrac{sR_2}{R_2^2+s^2X_2^2}. Finding the maximum of TT is the same as finding the maximum of f(s)f(s).

Step 2. Differentiate using the quotient rule and set the derivative to zero. With numerator u=sR2u = sR_2 and denominator v=R22+s2X22v = R_2^2+s^2X_2^2, the derivative is f′(s)=u′v−uv′v2=R2(R22+s2X22)−sR2(2sX22)v2f'(s) = \dfrac{u'v - uv'}{v^2} = \dfrac{R_2(R_2^2+s^2X_2^2) - sR_2(2sX_2^2)}{v^2}. Setting the numerator to zero and dividing through by R2R_2 (nonzero) gives R22+s2X22−2s2X22=0R_2^2 + s^2X_2^2 - 2s^2X_2^2 = 0, which simplifies to R22−s2X22=0R_2^2 - s^2X_2^2 = 0.

Step 3. Solve for the slip. R22=s2X22R_2^2 = s^2X_2^2, so sX2=R2sX_2 = R_2 (taking the positive root, since slip is positive), giving smax=R2X2s_{max} = \dfrac{R_2}{X_2}. This is exactly the condition that the two terms of the original denominator, R22R_2^2 and (sX2)2(sX_2)^2, become equal to each other.

Step 4. Substitute back to find the peak torque value. At s=R2/X2s = R_2/X_2, the denominator becomes R22+(sX2)2=R22+R22=2R22R_2^2+(sX_2)^2 = R_2^2+R_2^2 = 2R_2^2, and the numerator becomes sR2=(R2/X2)R2=R22/X2sR_2 = (R_2/X_2)R_2 = R_2^2/X_2, so f(smax)=R22/X22R22=12X2f(s_{max}) = \dfrac{R_2^2/X_2}{2R_2^2} = \dfrac{1}{2X_2}. The result is independent of R2R_2: whatever value the rotor resistance takes, the maximum torque a given machine can produce depends only on X2X_2 and V1V_1 — only the slip at which that maximum occurs shifts with R2R_2. This is why adding external rotor resistance (wound-rotor starters) moves the peak toward standstill without lowering the peak itself.

Worked example

Problem. An induction motor has per-phase rotor resistance R2=0.3 ΩR_2 = 0.3\ \Omega and standstill rotor reactance X2=1.5 ΩX_2 = 1.5\ \Omega (referred consistently). Find (a) the slip at which pull-out torque occurs, and (b) the ratio of pull-out torque to starting torque, taking V1V_1 constant.

Step 1. Use the derived condition smax=R2/X2s_{max} = R_2/X_2 from the derivation above: smax=0.3/1.5=0.2s_{max} = 0.3/1.5 = 0.2, so pull-out occurs at 20%20\% slip.

Step 2. Write T∝sR2/(R22+(sX2)2)T \propto sR_2/(R_2^2+(sX_2)^2), dropping the common factor V12V_1^2, and evaluate at standstill, s=1s=1: Tstart∝1×0.30.32+(1×1.5)2=0.30.09+2.25=0.32.34=0.1282T_{start} \propto \dfrac{1\times0.3}{0.3^2+(1\times1.5)^2} = \dfrac{0.3}{0.09+2.25} = \dfrac{0.3}{2.34} = 0.1282.

Step 3. Evaluate the same expression at smax=0.2s_{max}=0.2: Tmax∝0.2×0.30.32+(0.2×1.5)2=0.060.09+0.09=0.060.18=0.3333T_{max} \propto \dfrac{0.2\times0.3}{0.3^2+(0.2\times1.5)^2} = \dfrac{0.06}{0.09+0.09} = \dfrac{0.06}{0.18} = 0.3333. This matches the closed-form check 1/(2X2)=1/(2×1.5)=0.33331/(2X_2) = 1/(2\times1.5) = 0.3333 from Step 4 of the derivation, confirming the algebra.

Step 4. Take the ratio: Tmax/Tstart=0.3333/0.1282≈2.6T_{max}/T_{start} = 0.3333/0.1282 \approx 2.6.

Answer: pull-out torque occurs at s=0.2s = 0.2 and is about 2.62.6 times the starting torque for this motor — a sizeable margin between what the motor produces at switch-on and its true ceiling, which is why cage motors, despite having positive starting torque, often still need starting aids to limit inrush current rather than to boost torque.

Competitive stretch

If a supply voltage sag of 10%10\% occurs while this motor is starting, the starting torque falls to (0.9)2=0.81(0.9)^2 = 0.81, i.e. about 81%81\% of its rated value — a 19%19\% torque loss from only a 10%10\% voltage drop, since T∝V12T \propto V_1^2. The slip at pull-out, smax=R2/X2=0.2s_{max}=R_2/X_2=0.2, is unaffected by voltage, because it depends only on R2R_2 and X2X_2; only the magnitude of torque at every slip scales with V12V_1^2, not the shape of the curve.

Common traps

  • Assuming maximum torque occurs at maximum slip (s=1s=1, standstill) — pull-out actually occurs at the intermediate slip smax=R2/X2s_{max}=R_2/X_2, and starting torque is generally well below pull-out torque, as the worked example shows.
  • Forgetting T∝V12T \propto V_1^2: a modest supply voltage sag reduces available torque by a much larger fraction (a 10%10\% sag costs about 19%19\% of torque), which is why induction motors are especially sensitive to voltage dips at starting.
  • Treating the high-slip side of the curve (beyond pull-out, toward s=1s=1) as usable — that region is unstable, since torque falls as slip rises further, so any extra load there stalls the motor rather than settling to a new equilibrium.
  • Confusing "starting torque" with "pull-out (breakdown) torque" — they are different points on the same curve with generally different numerical values, and only one of them (pull-out) is a true maximum.

Ask the tutor: want to see how adding external rotor resistance in a wound-rotor motor shifts the pull-out slip toward standstill while leaving the peak torque unchanged — the idea behind rotor-resistance starters covered next?

Why does maximum torque not simply occur at standstill, where slip is largest?

Because the torque expression has slip in both the numerator and the denominator. At small slip the denominator is dominated by the fixed R22R_2^2 term, so torque grows with slip. But once slip is large enough that (sX2)2(sX_2)^2 overtakes R22R_2^2, the denominator grows faster than the numerator, and torque starts falling even though slip keeps increasing. The peak sits exactly where the two denominator terms are equal, at smax=R2/X2s_{max}=R_2/X_2 — not at s=1s=1.

Does increasing rotor resistance increase the pull-out torque?

No — the derivation shows the peak torque value itself, 1/(2X2)1/(2X_2), does not depend on R2R_2 at all. What changes is where the peak sits: since smax=R2/X2s_{max}=R_2/X_2, a larger R2R_2 pushes the pull-out slip closer to standstill, meaning the motor reaches its maximum torque earlier, right near start-up. This is exactly why wound-rotor motors add external rotor resistance during starting — it raises starting torque toward the (unchanged) pull-out value without changing that maximum.

Why is the stable region only the part of the curve before pull-out?

Stability here means the motor can settle at a fixed speed for a given load. Before pull-out, torque increases with slip, so if load torque momentarily exceeds motor torque, the motor slows, slip rises, and motor torque rises to match — self-correcting. Beyond pull-out, torque decreases as slip rises, so the same disturbance makes the mismatch worse: the motor keeps slowing and torque keeps falling, until it stalls. Only the rising part of the curve, from s=0s=0 to smaxs_{max}, can host a stable equilibrium.

Before this

Where this leads