Complex number operations
has no real solution — no real number squares to . Mathematicians resolved this by inventing a new symbol, , and building a whole number system, the complex numbers, out of it. Every complex number is written , a real part paired with an imaginary part, and once that pairing is fixed, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division all follow ordinary algebra with one extra rule: . This article works through the four operations, the conjugate and modulus that make division possible, and the Argand plane that lets you see a complex number as a point rather than just a formula. It closes with the trick for finding the square root of a complex number — a natural next step once you can multiply and divide confidently. Every one of these operations reduces to algebra you already know, plus a single new fact to keep track of, which is exactly why complex numbers feel strange at first and then, quickly, entirely routine.
A complex number is manipulated with ordinary algebra plus the single rule , and division always works by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.
The core idea
A complex number in algebraic (Cartesian) form is
where: is the real part and is the imaginary part.
Addition and subtraction combine real parts with real parts and imaginary parts with imaginary parts:
Multiplication expands like any binomial product, then replaces with :
Conjugate and modulus are the tools that make division possible. The conjugate of is , and multiplying a complex number by its own conjugate always clears the imaginary part: , a non-negative real number. The modulus is
The multiplicative inverse for is , and the additive inverse is simply .
Equality of complex numbers. Two complex numbers and are equal only when and — the real parts match and the imaginary parts match independently, as two separate conditions rather than one. This is why "equate real and imaginary parts" is a legitimate algebraic move: it is not a shortcut, it is the definition of equality for complex numbers, and it is used whenever an unknown complex number is compared against a known target.
Powers of . Because , every higher power of cycles through just four values:
and then the pattern repeats: , , and so on. To simplify for a large exponent , divide by and keep only the remainder, since (a remainder of gives ). Memorising this four-value cycle is faster than recomputing powers of from scratch every time one appears in an expansion. The svg below shows as a point on the Argand plane, with modulus the distance from the origin and argument the angle from the positive real axis, giving the polar form .
Converting to polar form means finding and from and . Take : here , , so . Then and ; since and , lies in the second quadrant, so . Both signs must be checked together — reading off a reference angle from alone, ignoring the sign of , is the single commonest slip in this step. Putting the pieces together, , which can be checked by expanding back: and , matching and exactly.
Dividing complex numbers is not defined by cross-multiplying like ordinary fractions — it is defined by turning the denominator into a real number first, using the fact that a complex number multiplied by its own conjugate is always real and non-negative, and the goal here is to derive the general standard-form result once so it never has to be re-derived from scratch.
Step 1. State the problem. For and with , the quotient must again be written in the standard form before it can be used in further algebra, so the goal is to eliminate from the denominator entirely while keeping the value of the fraction unchanged. Simply writing and stopping there is not an acceptable final answer in this topic, because it still has sitting in the denominator.
Step 2. Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, . This is legal because , so the value of the fraction is untouched:
Step 3. Expand the denominator using , which is real by construction, and expand the numerator as an ordinary product before simplifying :
Step 4. Combine both results into the standard form:
Every division of complex numbers reduces to this one manoeuvre — multiply by the conjugate of the denominator — so it is worth remembering as a single reflex rather than re-deriving it each time.
Worked example
Let and . Find , , and .
Step 1. Sum: real parts and imaginary parts combine separately, .
Step 2. Product: expand as a binomial product and replace with ,
Step 3. Quotient: multiply by the conjugate of the denominator, ,
So , , and .
Competitive stretch
Find , the polar form of , and .
Step 1. Modulus: .
Step 2. Square root: let . Squaring both sides and equating real and imaginary parts gives and , so . Also (a shortcut that avoids solving a quartic directly).
Step 3. Add and subtract the two equations and : adding gives ; subtracting gives . Since , and must share a sign, so or , giving .
Step 4. Check by squaring: — confirmed. The modulus is , and . The square root of a complex number always comes as a pair, exactly like real square roots, because if then too.
Common traps
- Dividing by multiplying by the conjugate of the numerator instead of the denominator — it must always be the denominator's conjugate.
- Forgetting carries through every expansion, not just the first occurrence of .
- Writing for positive — convert to -form first () before multiplying negative radicands.
- Confusing modulus (a non-negative real number ) with argument (an angle ) — they answer different questions.
- Reading off the argument's quadrant from or alone — always check the signs of both the real and imaginary parts together before deciding which quadrant lies in.
These five traps account for most of the marks lost on this topic in practice — each one is a small, avoidable slip rather than a gap in understanding, so a quick self-check against this list before submitting an answer is worth the ten seconds it takes.
Ask the tutor: if any step of rationalising a quotient or expanding a product with feels shaky, ask the AI tutor to redo it with fresh numbers or check your working line by line.
Why does multiplying by the conjugate always remove i from the denominator?
Because — the cross terms and cancel exactly, leaving only real squares. That cancellation is guaranteed by the algebra of conjugate pairs, not a coincidence for particular numbers, so the trick works for every complex denominator except zero.
Is z1 divided by z2 the same as z1 times the inverse of z2?
Yes. Since , multiplying by gives , which is exactly the numerator and denominator you get from rationalising directly. Both routes land on the same standard-form answer, so use whichever is faster for the numbers in front of you — for a single division, rationalising directly is usually quicker than first computing the inverse and then multiplying.
Do I always need to convert to polar form to multiply or divide complex numbers?
No. Algebraic-form multiplication and division (expand, use , rationalise by the conjugate) work for every problem in this topic and are usually faster for two or three numbers. Polar form becomes worth the extra step mainly for repeated multiplication or powers, where angles simply add instead of expanding brackets repeatedly, which is why it appears alongside the plotting and modulus work rather than replacing algebraic-form arithmetic entirely.