Solving quadratic equations

A quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of degree 22, and the big shift at Class 11 is that its roots no longer have to be real. Earlier, in ICSE Class X, "no real roots" meant a dead end. Now the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that every degree-22 equation has exactly two roots, real or complex, and the quadratic formula is trusted to produce both cases without any special-casing. This article rebuilds the quadratic formula from completing the square, shows how the sign of the discriminant D=b2−4acD=b^2-4ac decides whether the roots are real or a complex-conjugate pair, and extends the toolkit to equations that are not literally quadratic but become quadratic after a smart substitution — a skill this sub-unit leans on repeatedly. Two worked examples anchor the ideas: one equation with a negative discriminant, giving complex roots, and one quartic that reduces to a quadratic in disguise.

The core insight

The quadratic formula x=−b±b2−4ac2ax=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} always yields exactly two roots — real when b2−4ac≥0b^2-4ac\ge0, complex-conjugate when b2−4ac<0b^2-4ac<0 — because the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees two roots for any degree-2 equation.

The core idea

Where it fits. This topic opens the Quadratic Equations sub-unit of Algebra (Section A, ISC Class 11 Mathematics), building on the factorisation and formula methods already met for real-rooted quadratics in ICSE Class X. It introduces the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and prepares the ground for later topics on the nature and relations of roots, both of which depend on being fluent with the discriminant.

The formula itself. For real coefficients a,b,ca,b,c with a≠0a\neq0, the equation

ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0

has roots given by

x=−b±b2−4ac2a,x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a},

where: a,b,ca,b,c are the real coefficients, xx is the unknown, and the quantity D=b2−4acD=b^2-4ac under the root is the discriminant.

What the discriminant decides. If D≥0D\ge0, D\sqrt D is real and the formula gives two real roots (equal roots when D=0D=0). If D<0D<0, D\sqrt D is imaginary, and the two roots form a complex-conjugate pair

x=−b2a±i ∣D∣2a.x=\frac{-b}{2a}\pm i\,\frac{\sqrt{|D|}}{2a}.

A negative discriminant never means "no solution" — the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees a degree-2 equation has exactly two roots; when D<0D<0 those roots simply are not real.

Equations reducible to quadratic form. Many equations that are not literally quadratic become quadratic after a substitution. For example, x4−13x2+36=0x^4-13x^2+36=0 is quadratic in y=x2y=x^2. Spotting the repeated block — here x2x^2 — and substituting yy for it turns an unfamiliar-looking equation into an ordinary quadratic, which is solved as usual and then translated back to the original variable. The same trick works whenever an expression and its square (or an expression and its reciprocal squared, as in x+1xx+\dfrac1x type problems) both appear: rename the repeated block, solve the resulting quadratic in the new variable, then undo the substitution for every valid value found. Two things make this step-family error-prone in practice — students solve for the substituted variable and stop, forgetting to translate back, or they take only the positive square root when recovering xx from y=x2y=x^2, silently discarding half the answers.

Why the sign of the discriminant behaves this way. Geometrically, the graph of y=ax2+bx+cy=ax^2+bx+c is a parabola, and the roots of ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 are exactly where that parabola crosses the xx-axis. When D>0D>0 the parabola crosses the axis at two distinct points, giving two real roots. When D=0D=0 the parabola is tangent to the axis at its vertex, giving one repeated real root. When D<0D<0 the entire parabola lies above or below the axis without touching it — there is no real crossing at all, which is exactly the case where the algebra hands back complex roots instead. The completing-the-square derivation below makes this precise without needing a picture: the sign of DD is literally the sign of the quantity being square-rooted, so it directly controls whether that square root is real or imaginary.

Figure
A number line showing the discriminant sign splitting real and complex root cases
The discriminant D = b squared minus 4ac decides the root type D = 0 equal real roots D greater than 0 two distinct real roots D less than 0 complex conjugate pair example: x squared minus 5x plus 6 example: 2x squared plus 3x plus 5
Derivation ADeriving the quadratic formula by completing the square

The goal is to start from the general equation ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 with a≠0a\neq0 and derive the quadratic formula purely by algebraic manipulation, showing that the same formula automatically covers both real and complex roots depending on the sign of what ends up under the square root — no case-splitting is needed until the very last step of interpreting the result.

Step 1. Divide the whole equation by aa (allowed since a≠0a\neq0), giving x2+bax+ca=0x^2+\dfrac{b}{a}x+\dfrac{c}{a}=0. This isolates the x2x^2 coefficient at 11, which is what makes completing the square possible on the left-hand side.

Step 2. Move the constant term to the right and add (b2a)2\left(\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2 to both sides to complete the square: x2+bax+(b2a)2=(b2a)2−cax^2+\dfrac{b}{a}x+\left(\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2=\left(\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2-\dfrac{c}{a}. The left side is now a perfect square, (x+b2a)2\left(x+\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2.

Step 3. Simplify the right side over a common denominator 4a24a^2: (b2a)2−ca=b24a2−4ac4a2=b2−4ac4a2\left(\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2-\dfrac{c}{a}=\dfrac{b^2}{4a^2}-\dfrac{4ac}{4a^2}=\dfrac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}. So (x+b2a)2=b2−4ac4a2\left(x+\dfrac{b}{2a}\right)^2=\dfrac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}, with the discriminant D=b2−4acD=b^2-4ac now sitting explicitly in the numerator.

Step 4. Take the square root of both sides — remembering both signs — and isolate xx: x+b2a=±b2−4ac2ax+\dfrac{b}{2a}=\pm\dfrac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}, so x=−b±b2−4ac2ax=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}. This is exactly the quadratic formula, and it holds for any real a,b,ca,b,c with a≠0a\neq0 whether or not DD is negative, because the square root of a negative number is simply an imaginary number, not an undefined operation.

Worked example

Solve 2x2+3x+5=02x^2+3x+5=0.

Step 1. Identify the coefficients: a=2a=2, b=3b=3, c=5c=5.

Step 2. Compute the discriminant: D=b2−4ac=32−4(2)(5)=9−40=−31D=b^2-4ac=3^2-4(2)(5)=9-40=-31. Since D<0D<0, the roots will be a complex-conjugate pair, not real numbers.

Step 3. Apply the quadratic formula: x=−3±−314x=\dfrac{-3\pm\sqrt{-31}}{4}. Writing −31=i31\sqrt{-31}=i\sqrt{31} gives x=−3±i314x=\dfrac{-3\pm i\sqrt{31}}{4}.

Step 4. Check using sum and product of roots: sum should equal −b/a=−3/2-b/a=-3/2, and indeed −3+i314+−3−i314=−64=−32\dfrac{-3+i\sqrt{31}}{4}+\dfrac{-3-i\sqrt{31}}{4}=\dfrac{-6}{4}=-\dfrac32. The roots are x=−3+i314x=\dfrac{-3+i\sqrt{31}}{4} and x=−3−i314x=\dfrac{-3-i\sqrt{31}}{4}.

Competitive stretch

Solve x4−13x2+36=0x^4-13x^2+36=0.

Step 1. This is quadratic in y=x2y=x^2: substituting gives y2−13y+36=0y^2-13y+36=0.

Step 2. Factorise: two numbers multiplying to 3636 and adding to −13-13 are −4-4 and −9-9, so (y−4)(y−9)=0(y-4)(y-9)=0, giving y=4y=4 or y=9y=9.

Step 3. Substitute back y=x2y=x^2: from y=4y=4, x=±2x=\pm2; from y=9y=9, x=±3x=\pm3. The four roots of the quartic are x=2,−2,3,−3x=2,-2,3,-3, consistent with the quartic factorising fully as (x−2)(x+2)(x−3)(x+3)(x-2)(x+2)(x-3)(x+3).

Common traps

  • Concluding a quadratic "has no solution" when D<0D<0 — it always has exactly two solutions over the complex numbers; only real solutions fail to exist.
  • Losing roots when reducing to quadratic form — each valid value of yy can give up to two values of xx, so both ±\pm square roots must be taken, not just the positive one.
  • Sign errors inside the formula when bb is negative — always substitute the actual signed coefficient so −b-b flips correctly.
  • Writing −31\sqrt{-31} carelessly instead of pulling out ii explicitly as i31i\sqrt{31}.
  • Confusing "reducible to quadratic form" with an actual quadratic — after finding yy, the problem is not finished until yy has been translated back into values of the original variable xx.
  • Assuming a quadratic must factorise neatly — many quadratics, like 2x2+3x+5=02x^2+3x+5=0 above, have no rational (or even real) factorisation at all, and the formula is the only reliable route.

Ask the tutor: If a discriminant comes out negative and the complex-root notation feels unfamiliar, ask the AI tutor to walk through the completing-the-square derivation once more using your own coefficients.

Why does a negative discriminant not mean the equation has no solution?

Because the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that any degree-2 polynomial equation has exactly two roots, counted with multiplicity, over the complex numbers. A negative discriminant only means those two roots are not real — the square root of a negative number is simply an imaginary number, i∣D∣i\sqrt{|D|}, and the quadratic formula still produces a valid answer using it. "No real solution" and "no solution" are different statements; Class 11 replaces the first with the correct, complete picture.

How do I know when an equation is reducible to quadratic form?

Look for a repeated block appearing exactly twice, once squared relative to the other, such as x2x^2 and x4=(x2)2x^4=(x^2)^2, or an expression like x+1xx+\frac1x appearing alongside its square. Rename that repeated block as yy, rewrite the whole equation purely in terms of yy, and check that the result is a genuine quadratic in yy. Solve for yy first, then undo the substitution to recover every value of the original variable — remembering that each yy can produce up to two xx values.

Is factorisation still useful now that we have the formula, or should I always use the formula?

Factorisation is still the fastest route whenever the quadratic has neat integer or rational roots, since spotting two numbers that multiply and add correctly is often quicker than substituting into the formula. But factorisation only works when such neat factors exist, and there is no quick way to know that in advance without effectively solving the equation. The formula, by contrast, works unconditionally for every quadratic with real coefficients, real-rooted or not, which is why it is the dependable fallback: try factorisation first if the coefficients look friendly, but reach for the formula the moment factorisation is not obvious within a few seconds.

Before this

Where this leads