Conservation of energy; conservative and non-conservative forces
Drop a ball and it speeds up as it falls, trading height for speed; slide a book across a table and it slows down, its energy seemingly vanishing into heat. Both scenes obey the same law of energy conservation — the difference is entirely in the kind of force at work. Gravity gives the energy back exactly as it took it; friction does not. This distinction — conservative versus non-conservative forces — is what lets us define a potential energy for gravity and springs, and state the powerful shortcut of conservation of mechanical energy: , whenever only conservative forces act. Master this and problems on falling bodies, curved tracks and pendulums collapse from multi-step kinematics into one or two lines of algebra — and you also learn exactly when that shortcut is not allowed, which is just as important on an exam.
A force is conservative when its work depends only on start and end points (letting us define a potential energy ), and whenever only such forces act, total mechanical energy stays constant.
The core idea
Conservative vs non-conservative. A force is conservative if the work it does moving a body between two points is independent of the path taken — equivalently, the work done around any closed loop is zero. Gravity and the spring force are conservative; friction and air resistance are non-conservative, because the work done against them depends on the actual path length (a longer, winding path loses more energy to friction, even between the same endpoints).
Potential energy from a conservative force. For every conservative force we can define an associated potential energy , such that the work it does equals the decrease in :
where: is the work done by the conservative force, and , are the potential energies at the initial and final positions. For gravity near Earth's surface, (with measured from a chosen reference level); for a spring stretched or compressed by , .
Conservation of mechanical energy. When only conservative forces do work (no friction, no external drag), total mechanical energy — kinetic plus potential — stays fixed:
where: is kinetic energy and is potential energy. This follows from the work–energy theorem : if is entirely due to conservative forces, , so , i.e. . The figure below is the standard way this is tested: plot , , and against height during a fall. is a flat horizontal line; and trade off exactly, so wherever is maximum (and ), and wherever , is maximum (and ).
When non-conservative forces like friction also act, mechanical energy is not conserved — some converts to heat — and although still holds in general, once friction is present.
The goal is to derive a general formula for the speed of a body that starts from rest at height and reaches a lower reference level under gravity alone (no friction, no air resistance), so that the familiar falls out of the single conservation statement rather than needing separate kinematics equations for every new geometry, curve, or track shape.
Step 1. Set up the energy at the start. Take the lower level (ground, or bottom of a track) as the reference where . At the top, the body of mass starts from rest, so and . Total mechanical energy is .
Step 2. Apply conservation. Since only gravity (conservative) does work, stays fixed at throughout the motion — this is the single fact that replaces tracking the whole path, whether it is a straight drop or a curved, frictionless slide.
Step 3. Evaluate at the bottom. There, , so all the energy is kinetic: .
Step 4. Solve for . The mass cancels from both sides, giving — independent of the mass and, notably, independent of the shape of the path taken (as long as it is frictionless), because only ever depended on the starting height. Result: , valid whenever only conservative forces act between the two points.
Worked example
A block of mass slides down a smooth (frictionless) curved track from a height of and then moves across a rough horizontal section, where a constant friction force of acts. Find (a) the block's speed at the bottom of the curve, (b) the distance it travels on the rough section before stopping, and (c) the coefficient of kinetic friction on that section.
Step 1. On the smooth curve, only gravity does work, so mechanical energy is conserved. Taking the bottom as the reference level, , all of it kinetic at the bottom: .
Step 2. On the rough section, friction removes kinetic energy until the block stops. By the work–energy theorem, , so .
Step 3. For the coefficient of kinetic friction, use on the level section, where the normal force equals : .
The block covers before stopping, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of about ; all of mechanical energy is accounted for as heat generated by friction — no energy is truly lost, only converted out of the K+U form.
Common traps
- Believing energy is "lost" when friction acts — mechanical energy decreases, but total energy including heat is always conserved; only mechanical energy needs purely conservative forces to stay constant.
- Assuming every force is conservative — normal reaction and tension often do zero work (perpendicular to motion), but friction genuinely removes mechanical energy whenever it acts.
- Applying on a section where friction or an applied force does work, without first checking that only conservative forces act there.
- Forgetting to fix a single, consistent reference level for before computing energies — only differences in matter, but the same reference must be used throughout one problem.
Ask the tutor: Want to try a few more conservation-of-energy problems on inclines, springs, or pendulums to build speed for the exam?
Why does the work done by a conservative force not depend on the path taken?
Because the force is derived from a potential energy function that depends only on position — moving from point A to point B always changes by the same amount, , regardless of the route. Gravity is a clean example: lifting a mass by height always costs of work against gravity, whether you go straight up or by a long zig-zag ramp, because only the net change in height matters. Friction fails this test because it always opposes motion, so a longer path always means more work done against it — hence more energy lost, which makes the total path-dependent.
If mechanical energy is not really destroyed by friction, why do we say it is "lost"?
"Lost" is shorthand for "no longer available as ordered kinetic or potential energy of the moving body" — it has been converted into heat (and sometimes sound), which is disordered molecular kinetic energy in the surfaces and surrounding air. Total energy, tracked across all forms, is always conserved; it is only the mechanical part, , that decreases when friction (or any non-conservative force) does negative work. That is why the conservation law is stated as applying only when purely conservative forces act.
Can a normal force or tension ever be treated as conservative or non-conservative?
Normal force and (ideal, inextensible) string tension usually do zero work because they act perpendicular to the direction of motion — on a curved frictionless track, for instance, the normal force is always perpendicular to the velocity, so it neither adds energy nor removes it, and does not need to be classified as conservative or non-conservative at all. They only start doing nonzero work in unusual setups (e.g. a normal force from an accelerating platform), and even then such cases are rare at this level — the standard exam pairing to remember is gravity/spring as conservative and friction/air resistance as non-conservative.