Collisions in one dimension
Two billiard balls meet head-on. One stops dead, the other rolls off with the exact speed the first one had — a result so clean it looks like a magic trick, until you realise it falls straight out of two conservation laws you already know. Every collision along a straight line, whether it is a cricket ball caught by a fielder, a bumper car crash, or a proton striking a nucleus, obeys the same two rules: momentum is always conserved, and kinetic energy is conserved only if the collision is elastic. This section builds the general formula for a one-dimensional elastic collision from those two laws, reads off three physically important special cases, and works through the perfectly inelastic limit where two bodies stick together and some kinetic energy is deliberately "lost" to heat, sound, and deformation.
In any isolated one-dimensional collision momentum is always conserved, while kinetic energy is conserved only if the collision is elastic, and solving the two conservation equations together gives the general elastic final-velocity formulas that reduce to intuitive results for equal, very heavy, and very light colliding bodies.
The core idea
A collision is a brief, strong interaction between two bodies — brief enough that external forces (like friction or gravity acting during the contact) can be ignored. Two facts anchor everything that follows.
Momentum is conserved in every collision. As long as the two-body system is isolated from external forces, the total linear momentum before and after the collision is the same, regardless of what type of collision it is:
where: are the masses, are the initial velocities, and are the final velocities, all measured along the same line (with sign for direction).
Kinetic energy is conserved only in an elastic collision. An elastic collision conserves both momentum and total kinetic energy:
An inelastic collision conserves momentum but not kinetic energy — some of it converts to heat, sound, and permanent deformation. The extreme case, a perfectly inelastic collision, is where the two bodies stick together and move off with one common final velocity . The figure below shows the equal-mass elastic case: the moving ball transfers its entire velocity to the stationary one and stops, which is exactly the "billiard ball" result from the overview.
The general one-dimensional elastic collision formula (derived below) lets you find and for any masses and initial speeds:
Setting (target at rest) gives three named special cases: gives , (complete velocity exchange). gives , (the heavy body barely slows; the light body is flung forward at nearly double the incoming speed). gives , (the light body bounces straight back, like a ball off a wall; the heavy body barely moves). For a perfectly inelastic collision, momentum conservation alone (with ) gives the common final velocity:
and the kinetic energy lost is , converted to heat, sound, and deformation.
The goal is to solve the momentum-conservation equation and the kinetic-energy-conservation equation together, for two bodies of mass colliding elastically along a line with initial velocities , and extract closed-form expressions for the final velocities and purely in terms of the masses and initial velocities, without guessing the answer first.
Step 1. Write both conservation laws with the unknowns on one side. Momentum: . Kinetic energy: , after multiplying the energy equation through by and rearranging so masses group with their own before-and-after terms.
Step 2. Factor the energy equation using . The left side becomes and the right side becomes .
Step 3. Divide the Step 2 equation by the Step 1 equation term by term (both sides of Step 1 are nonzero for a genuine collision). The factors and cancel top and bottom, leaving the compact relative-velocity relation , or equivalently — the relative speed of approach before impact equals the relative speed of separation after impact, for an elastic collision specifically.
Step 4. Use this relation to eliminate one unknown. From Step 3, . Substitute into the momentum equation and solve for : , which rearranges to , giving .
Step 5. Substitute this back into and simplify to get the matching expression . As a check, setting collapses these to and — the bodies simply exchange velocities, matching the worked example below.
Worked example
A ball of mass moving at collides elastically, head-on, with an identical ball at rest. Find both final velocities, and then check what happens if the second ball's mass is tripled to instead.
Step 1. Identify the case. Here , , — the equal-mass special case, so we expect complete velocity exchange.
Step 2. Apply the general formulas. , and .
Step 3. Interpret. The first ball stops completely and the second moves off at — the incoming ball's entire velocity is transferred, exactly as the equal-mass rule predicts.
Answer: , .
Competitive stretch
Now keep , , , but make the target heavier: . Using the same formulas, and . The incoming ball rebounds backward at (negative sign, reversed direction) while the heavier target moves forward at — a preview of the trend, though here the mass ratio is only , not extreme enough for the full , approximation to kick in yet.
Common traps
- Assuming kinetic energy is conserved in every collision — only elastic collisions conserve it; momentum is conserved in all collisions (isolated system).
- Mixing up the three special cases — , , and give distinctly different outcomes and must be matched to the actual mass ratio, not applied by memory alone.
- Dropping the sign on a rebound velocity — when the light body bounces back off a heavy one, is negative, and that sign must carry through any energy or further-motion calculation.
- Thinking "perfectly inelastic" means the final kinetic energy is zero — the combined body still moves (unless total momentum is exactly zero) and only the conservation of kinetic energy fails, not motion itself.
Ask the tutor: Want to work through a few more one-dimensional collisions with different mass ratios, or see how the coefficient of restitution generalises the elastic and inelastic cases together?
Why does relative velocity of approach equal relative velocity of separation only for elastic collisions?
That relation, , comes directly from combining momentum and kinetic-energy conservation, as shown in the derivation above — it only holds when both quantities are conserved, which is the definition of an elastic collision. In an inelastic collision kinetic energy is not conserved, so the algebra that produced that neat relative-velocity relation breaks down, and the bodies separate more slowly than they approached (or, in the perfectly inelastic case, do not separate at all).
Does it matter which body I call body 1 and which I call body 2?
No, as long as you are consistent. The formulas are symmetric under swapping the labels: if you relabel body 1 as body 2 and vice versa, the formula for becomes the formula for and vice versa. What genuinely matters is getting the sign of each velocity right relative to one chosen positive direction along the line of motion — that convention, not the numbering, is where marks are usually lost.
If momentum is always conserved, why do we say kinetic energy is "lost" in an inelastic collision?
"Lost" here means lost from the kinetic energy of the two bodies' overall motion — it has not vanished, by the law of conservation of energy overall. It has converted into other forms: heat generated by internal friction during impact, sound waves radiating away, and permanent deformation (bent metal, a dented panel) that stores energy in the bodies' internal structure. Momentum only tracks motion of the centre of mass, so it is untouched by where that energy goes; kinetic energy tracks the bodies' bulk motion specifically, so it visibly drops.