Integration by substitution
Some integrals look nothing like the standard forms in a table, yet they are secretly a chain-rule derivative in disguise. Integration by substitution is the trick that strips off that disguise. Spot an inner function sitting inside an outer one, notice that its derivative is lurking elsewhere in the integrand, rename the inner function , and the whole mess collapses into a one-line standard integral in . This sits in the Integrals sub-unit of Calculus, right after the basic standard forms, and it is the gateway technique before integration by parts and partial fractions. Two patterns recur constantly on this syllabus: and . Once you can recognise these two shapes on sight, a large fraction of exam integration questions fall quickly.
Substitution runs the chain rule backwards: setting turns an integrand shaped like into the plain integral .
The core idea
Differentiation has the chain rule; integration by substitution is simply that rule read in reverse. If , then setting gives , and the whole integral turns into a function of alone.
where: is the "inner function" chosen as the new variable , is the leftover piece of the integrand that must exactly match , and is whatever standard function remains once replaces . Two specific instances of this idea are worth memorising outright, because they appear over and over in this syllabus. Substituting into turns it into , giving
where: is any differentiable function, is its derivative appearing as a factor in the integrand, is a real number other than , and is the constant of integration. The same substitution applied to turns it into , giving the log form
where: the modulus is essential because may be negative over part of the domain, and is only defined for . The general procedure behind both boxed results is always the same four moves: choose so that (up to a constant factor) matches what is left in the integrand, rewrite the entire integral purely in terms of , integrate using a standard form, then resubstitute and append . The hardest part is rarely the algebra — it is spotting the shape. An integrand qualifies for substitution whenever you can point at one visible piece and say "that looks like the derivative of this other piece sitting next to it." The two boxed results are not the only place substitution shows up, but they cover the large majority of exam integrands on this syllabus. Integrals such as (here , so , giving the power form with ) or (here , so , giving the log form directly) are both instances of the same pairing, just dressed differently. Training your eye to separate an integrand into "inner function" and "its derivative, possibly times a constant" is what makes substitution fast rather than a trial-and-error search.
Starting from the plain rule that for , show step by step that substituting into the integral reproduces the boxed formula exactly, so that the shortcut can be applied directly on sight without repeating the substitution every time.
Step 1. Begin with the target integral , where is differentiable and . The integrand visibly has two pieces: the factor , and alongside it the factor , which is exactly the derivative of the base of that power.
Step 2. Introduce the substitution . Differentiating both sides with respect to gives , so . This is the key move: the "extra" factor in the original integral is precisely , with nothing left over and no compensating constant needed.
Step 3. Rewrite entirely in terms of . Since becomes and becomes , the integral is now , a plain power-rule integral with no trace of remaining.
Step 4. Apply the standard power rule for integration, valid because : , where is the constant of integration collected at this stage.
Step 5. Resubstitute to return the answer to the original variable : , which is exactly the boxed result quoted above. The case is excluded here because it would need instead, which is the separate log-form result derived the same way.
Worked example
Evaluate .
Step 1. Choose the substitution. Let , so , i.e. . The factor sitting next to is exactly , so this substitution absorbs the entire integrand with nothing left over.
Step 2. Rewrite the integral purely in terms of . Since and ,
Step 3. Integrate using the power rule with .
Step 4. Resubstitute to return to .
Competitive stretch
The log-form pattern is worth seeing worked once too, since it is just as common in exams. Evaluate . Rewriting and letting gives , so . The integral becomes , and resubstituting gives , which is conventionally rewritten using as
A near-free check after any substitution problem: differentiate the final answer and confirm it reproduces the original integrand. That single habit catches almost every sign slip, missing constant, or incomplete resubstitution before it costs exam marks.
Common traps
- Leaving a stray in the integrand after substituting — this means was not fully converted into , so the substitution is incomplete or the wrong variable was chosen.
- Forgetting a compensating constant multiple — for instance if the integrand contains but , a factor of must be inserted to match.
- Stopping at the answer in terms of and forgetting to resubstitute back to — an integral must always be reported in the original variable.
- Applying the shortcut when the numerator is only a constant multiple of the derivative of the denominator, not the exact derivative — always verify the derivative relationship before using the shortcut, and adjust with a constant factor if needed.
- Dropping the modulus sign in , which matters whenever takes negative values anywhere on the interval being integrated over.
Ask the tutor: not sure which substitution to try on an integral like , or want your final answer checked by differentiating it back — ask the AI tutor to walk through it with you.
How do I know which part of the integrand to call t?
Look for a function whose derivative appears elsewhere in the integrand, possibly scaled by a constant. If you see sitting inside a square root and a lone factor of (or ) nearby, that is a strong signal because it is the derivative of . Similarly, a denominator paired with something resembling its derivative on top signals the log-form pattern. With practice, spotting this pairing becomes close to instant.
What happens if I choose the wrong substitution?
Nothing dangerous happens — you simply cannot finish. After substituting, if the integral still contains a leftover that will not cancel or convert using , the chosen was not the right inner function, or a compensating constant was missed. Try a different , most often the innermost function under a root, power, or in a denominator, and check whether its derivative (up to a constant) is visible elsewhere in the integrand.
Why does the log form need the modulus sign but the power form does not?
The natural logarithm is only defined for , but in can be negative over parts of its domain, so is needed to keep the antiderivative valid wherever . The power form has no such restriction for most integer or rational , since raising a real number to a power is generally still defined even when the base is negative.