Variable separable equations
Some differential equations look tangled but are secretly simple: if every can be pushed to one side with and every to the other with , the whole equation splits into two ordinary integrals. That is the variable separable method, the first and most fundamental technique in the ISC Class 12 Differential Equations chapter, and the building block that the homogeneous and linear methods eventually reduce to. This article rebuilds the method from the general solution down to a fully worked initial-value problem, then looks at the "reducible to separable" trick — a substitution that turns an equation that is not separable at first glance into one that is — and the traps that cost the most marks: forgetting the constant, dropping lost solutions, and mishandling a substitution's back-conversion.
If , rearranging to and integrating both sides independently — with a single constant — gives the general solution, and a given initial condition then fixes to give the particular solution.
The core idea
A first-order differential equation is variable separable if the right side factors purely into a function of times a function of , with no term that mixes the two variables together:
where: depends only on and depends only on ; if the right side cannot be split this way (for example , where the two variables are added rather than multiplied), the equation is not directly separable. Once recognised, rearrange so every -term (including ) sits on one side and every -term (including ) sits on the other, then integrate each side on its own:
where: is a single arbitrary constant of integration — only one is needed, because the two separate constants produced by integrating each side individually can always be combined into one overall constant on either side of the equation. This relation between and is the general solution; substituting a given initial condition pins down and yields the particular solution. Not every first-order equation is separable as written, but some become separable after a substitution. If the right side is a function of a linear combination of and , such as , setting converts it into a separable equation in and , since lets be replaced entirely in terms of . Among the three first-order techniques in this syllabus — separable, homogeneous, linear — separable is the natural first check on any equation: the homogeneous method itself reduces to a separable equation after the substitution , so spotting separability early can save a great deal of algebra.
The goal is to show, starting only from and the ordinary rules of differentiation and integration, why treating and as separable pieces that can be integrated on opposite sides of the equation is legitimate and produces a genuine solution, not merely a notational trick — and why exactly one arbitrary constant survives even though two separate integrations are performed.
Step 1. Start from the defining form , with . Divide both sides by : . Every term on the left now depends on (through the function ) and on only through the derivative ; every term on the right depends only on .
Step 2. Integrate both sides with respect to : . On the left, this is exactly the pattern of integration by substitution with : since , the left integral becomes , purely in terms of .
Step 3. Write the result as . Two indefinite integrations were performed, each of which in principle produces its own constant, say on the left and on the right; but and can be combined into a single constant moved to one side, since both are arbitrary real numbers and only their difference matters for the relation between and . This is why only one constant is written, not two.
Step 4. Read off the meaning. The equation from Step 3 is an implicit (or, after simplification, explicit) relation that is satisfied by every solution curve of the original differential equation — the general solution, a whole family of curves indexed by . Given one point that the solution curve must pass through, substituting it into the relation solves for the single unknown , selecting exactly one curve from the family: the particular solution.
Worked example
Solve , given the initial condition .
Step 1. Check the form and separate. The right side is , a product of a function of alone and a function of alone, so the equation is separable. Cross-multiplying, .
Step 2. Integrate both sides. gives , the general solution.
Step 3. Apply the initial condition. Substituting : , so .
Step 4. Write the particular solution and check it. , equivalently . Differentiating the implicit form gives , i.e. — matching the original equation, so the solution checks out. Final answer: .
Competitive stretch
For with : rewrite , separate as , integrate to , apply to get , giving , so . The only new skill is splitting an exponential of a sum or difference before separating.
Common traps
- Trying to separate an equation that isn't in product form. cannot be separated directly — the and are added, not multiplied — so it needs the linear-equation method instead.
- Writing two constants instead of one. Integrating each side gives its own constant, but they must be combined into a single overall ; keeping two separately is sloppy and confuses the step where the initial condition is applied.
- Losing constant solutions when dividing by . If at some value , then is itself a solution that gets divided away in Step 1; ISC problems rarely probe this, but it is worth naming.
- Forgetting to convert back after a reducing substitution. After solving in terms of , the final answer must be rewritten in terms of and , not left in .
Ask the tutor: Not sure whether your differential equation is separable, which substitution to try, or how to apply an initial condition correctly? Ask the AI tutor to walk through the structure and check each algebraic step with you.
How do I tell quickly whether an equation is separable before starting the algebra?
Check whether the right side of can be written as a product , with no addition or subtraction mixing the two variables inside a single factor. If and appear added together, as in or inside , it is not directly separable — though a substitution like may reduce it to a separable equation in and . If and are multiplied, divided, or appear as separate factors, it usually is separable.
Why is only one constant of integration needed when both sides get integrated?
Each indefinite integration technically introduces its own constant, say on the -side and on the -side. But these are both arbitrary real numbers, and the equation only involves their difference, , which is itself just another arbitrary constant. So writing a single (usually placed on the -side) loses no generality — it is a bookkeeping simplification, not an approximation.
What is the point of the reducing substitution if the equation could just be solved as it is?
Equations like genuinely cannot be separated as written, because and are locked together inside . The substitution is not a shortcut but a necessity: it converts into an expression involving only , at which point the equation becomes separable in and and can be solved by the ordinary method — after which must be replaced back by to give the answer in the original variables.