Binding energy per nucleon
Weigh a nucleus on a precision balance and it always comes up lighter than the sum of its separate protons and neutrons. That missing mass has not vanished — Einstein's says it has been converted into the energy holding the nucleus together, its binding energy. Divide that binding energy by the number of nucleons and you get a single number, the binding energy per nucleon, that tells you how tightly bound, on average, each proton and neutron is. Plot this number against mass number for every known nucleus and one curve explains an entire chapter of nuclear physics: why iron and its neighbours are the most stable nuclei in the universe, why splitting a heavy nucleus like uranium releases energy, and why fusing light nuclei like hydrogen releases even more. This article builds the formula, reads the curve, and works through the same iron and uranium numbers you will meet in exam questions.
Binding energy per nucleon, , rises steeply for light nuclei, peaks near at iron, then falls slowly for heavy nuclei — so both fission of heavy nuclei and fusion of light nuclei move nucleons toward this peak and release energy.
The core idea
From mass defect to binding energy. A nucleus of mass number and atomic number is built from protons and neutrons. Measure the mass of the free nucleons and compare it to the measured mass of the nucleus, and the nucleus is always lighter. This shortfall is the mass defect , and by mass-energy equivalence it corresponds to the total binding energy:
where: is the mass defect (kg or, more conveniently, in atomic mass units u, where ) and is the speed of light. is the energy that would have to be supplied to break the nucleus apart into free, separated nucleons — equivalently, the energy released when those free nucleons come together to form the nucleus.
From binding energy to binding energy per nucleon. Total binding energy by itself is not a fair way to compare nuclei of different sizes, since a bigger nucleus naturally has more total binding energy just because it has more nucleons. Dividing by fixes this and gives the quantity that actually measures how tightly each nucleon is held:
where: is the binding energy per nucleon (typically quoted in MeV), is total binding energy, and is the mass number. A larger means the nucleus is, on average, more stable and harder to pull apart.
Shape of the curve. Plotting against for every stable nucleus produces one of the most information-dense graphs in physics. It rises sharply for the lightest nuclei — from about for deuterium () up through helium, carbon and oxygen — reaches a broad, flat maximum of roughly – per nucleon in the region – around iron and nickel, and then decreases slowly for heavier nuclei, falling to about per nucleon by uranium ().
Why the curve explains fission and fusion. Nuclei near sit at the peak — the most tightly bound, most stable nuclei that exist. Any nuclear process that moves nucleons toward that peak releases energy, because the products end up more tightly bound than the reactants. In fission, a heavy nucleus (low , right side of the curve) splits into two medium-mass fragments that sit higher on the curve. In fusion, two very light nuclei (low , left side of the curve) combine into a heavier product that again sits higher on the curve. Iron itself is essentially "nuclear ash": sitting at the peak, no ordinary fission or fusion reaction starting from iron can release energy, since there is nowhere higher on the curve to move to.
The goal is to show precisely how the two definitions above combine into the single working formula , and why dividing by rather than comparing raw binding energies is the step that makes the quantity meaningful for comparing nuclei of very different sizes across the periodic table.
Step 1. Start from the mass defect. A nucleus contains protons of mass and neutrons of mass . If these were free and separate, their total mass would be . The measured nuclear mass is always smaller. The mass defect is , a positive quantity for every stable nucleus.
Step 2. Convert the missing mass into binding energy. By , the vanished mass reappears as the energy that was released when the nucleons bound together (and that would have to be put back in to tear the nucleus apart): . Using lets mass defects measured in atomic mass units be converted straight to MeV without separately handling .
Step 3. Normalise by dividing by the number of nucleons. alone grows roughly in proportion to for any family of stable nuclei, so a bigger nucleus always has a bigger total even if its nucleons are, individually, no more tightly held. Dividing out removes this size effect: is a per-nucleon average, and only this normalised quantity can be compared meaningfully between, say, helium and uranium.
Step 4. Read stability off , not off . Because peaks near and falls on both sides, the most stable nuclei are not the biggest ones (which have the largest total ) but the ones nearest the peak of the per-nucleon curve — iron and its close neighbours.
Worked example
Given: the binding energy of is . Calculate the binding energy per nucleon and compare it with deuterium (). Then estimate the energy released when a uranium-235 nucleus () undergoes fission into two fragments of mass number about 117–118 with each.
Step 1. Iron-56 has mass number , so
Step 2. Compare with deuterium: versus shows iron nucleons are far more tightly bound — roughly eight times more energy per nucleon would be needed to break iron apart than to break deuterium apart, consistent with iron sitting near the peak of the curve.
Step 3. For the uranium fission estimate, find the total binding energy before splitting, using throughout since the total number of nucleons is conserved: .
Step 4. Find the total binding energy after splitting, using the fragments' higher average over the same 235 nucleons: .
Step 5. The energy released equals the increase in total binding energy, since the nucleons end up more tightly bound and the surplus binding energy appears as kinetic energy and radiation: .
Answer: , about times that of deuterium, and the estimated fission energy release is — matching the commonly quoted figure of roughly per uranium-235 fission event.
Common traps
- Confusing total binding energy (which generally increases with , since more nucleons means more total binding) with binding energy per nucleon (which peaks near and is the quantity that actually measures stability).
- Assuming the curve keeps rising for all heavy elements — it falls slowly past the iron peak, which is exactly why heavy nuclei like uranium are less stable and can undergo fission.
- Thinking iron itself can release energy by fission or fusion — it sits at the maximum of the curve, so neither splitting nor combining it releases energy.
- Forgetting that the energy released in fission or fusion equals the difference in total binding energy between products and reactants, not simply the binding energy of the products alone.
Ask the tutor: Want to work through another fission or fusion energy-release calculation, or see how the binding-energy curve connects to nuclear reactors and stars?
Why do we divide by A instead of just comparing total binding energies to judge stability
Total binding energy grows with the number of nucleons almost automatically — a bigger nucleus has more nucleons pulling on each other, so of course its total binding energy is larger, even if each individual nucleon is no more tightly held than in a smaller nucleus. Dividing by removes this size effect and leaves a genuine per-nucleon average, which is why , not alone, is the quantity that peaks at iron and correctly identifies it as the most stable nucleus.
Does a higher binding energy per nucleon mean more energy is released if that nucleus is destroyed
It means the opposite in a useful sense: a higher means more energy would be needed to pull that nucleus apart, because its nucleons are more tightly held. Energy is released in fission or fusion only when the products end up with higher than the reactants — the reaction is moving nucleons toward tighter binding, and the energy released is the increase in total binding energy, not the binding energy of any one nucleus in isolation.
Since fission and fusion both release energy, why does one need very heavy nuclei and the other very light ones
Both processes work by moving nucleons closer to the peak near , but they start from opposite ends of the curve. Heavy nuclei like uranium sit on the falling right-hand side, so splitting them into medium-mass fragments moves those nucleons up toward the peak. Light nuclei like hydrogen sit on the steeply rising left-hand side, so combining them into a heavier nucleus also moves the resulting nucleons up toward the peak. There is no process that starts at the peak and moves higher, which is why iron cannot power either reaction.